Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6

<p>Partitioning uncertainty in projections of future climate change into contributions from internal variability, model response uncertainty and emissions scenarios has historically relied on making assumptions about forced changes in the mean and variability. With the advent of multiple singl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Lehner, C. Deser, N. Maher, J. Marotzke, E. M. Fischer, L. Brunner, R. Knutti, E. Hawkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-05-01
Series:Earth System Dynamics
Online Access:https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/11/491/2020/esd-11-491-2020.pdf
id doaj-fc7b77fd30d64bccaa62197a49c82a46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc7b77fd30d64bccaa62197a49c82a462020-11-25T03:51:00ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth System Dynamics2190-49792190-49872020-05-011149150810.5194/esd-11-491-2020Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6F. Lehner0F. Lehner1C. Deser2N. Maher3J. Marotzke4E. M. Fischer5L. Brunner6R. Knutti7E. Hawkins8Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, SwitzerlandClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, USAClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, USAMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, GermanyInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, SwitzerlandNational Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK<p>Partitioning uncertainty in projections of future climate change into contributions from internal variability, model response uncertainty and emissions scenarios has historically relied on making assumptions about forced changes in the mean and variability. With the advent of multiple single-model initial-condition large ensembles (SMILEs), these assumptions can be scrutinized, as they allow a more robust separation between sources of uncertainty. Here, the framework from Hawkins and Sutton (2009) for uncertainty partitioning is revisited for temperature and precipitation projections using seven SMILEs and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project CMIP5 and CMIP6 archives. The original approach is shown to work well at global scales (potential method bias&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">&lt;</span>&thinsp;20&thinsp;%), while at local to regional scales such as British Isles temperature or Sahel precipitation, there is a notable potential method bias (up to 50&thinsp;%), and more accurate partitioning of uncertainty is achieved through the use of SMILEs. Whenever internal variability and forced changes therein are important, the need to evaluate and improve the representation of variability in models is evident. The available SMILEs are shown to be a good representation of the CMIP5 model diversity in many situations, making them a useful tool for interpreting CMIP5. CMIP6 often shows larger absolute and relative model uncertainty than CMIP5, although part of this difference can be reconciled with the higher average transient climate response in CMIP6. This study demonstrates the added value of a collection of SMILEs for quantifying and diagnosing uncertainty in climate projections.</p>https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/11/491/2020/esd-11-491-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Lehner
F. Lehner
C. Deser
N. Maher
J. Marotzke
E. M. Fischer
L. Brunner
R. Knutti
E. Hawkins
spellingShingle F. Lehner
F. Lehner
C. Deser
N. Maher
J. Marotzke
E. M. Fischer
L. Brunner
R. Knutti
E. Hawkins
Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6
Earth System Dynamics
author_facet F. Lehner
F. Lehner
C. Deser
N. Maher
J. Marotzke
E. M. Fischer
L. Brunner
R. Knutti
E. Hawkins
author_sort F. Lehner
title Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6
title_short Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6
title_full Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6
title_fullStr Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6
title_full_unstemmed Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6
title_sort partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and cmip5/6
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Earth System Dynamics
issn 2190-4979
2190-4987
publishDate 2020-05-01
description <p>Partitioning uncertainty in projections of future climate change into contributions from internal variability, model response uncertainty and emissions scenarios has historically relied on making assumptions about forced changes in the mean and variability. With the advent of multiple single-model initial-condition large ensembles (SMILEs), these assumptions can be scrutinized, as they allow a more robust separation between sources of uncertainty. Here, the framework from Hawkins and Sutton (2009) for uncertainty partitioning is revisited for temperature and precipitation projections using seven SMILEs and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project CMIP5 and CMIP6 archives. The original approach is shown to work well at global scales (potential method bias&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">&lt;</span>&thinsp;20&thinsp;%), while at local to regional scales such as British Isles temperature or Sahel precipitation, there is a notable potential method bias (up to 50&thinsp;%), and more accurate partitioning of uncertainty is achieved through the use of SMILEs. Whenever internal variability and forced changes therein are important, the need to evaluate and improve the representation of variability in models is evident. The available SMILEs are shown to be a good representation of the CMIP5 model diversity in many situations, making them a useful tool for interpreting CMIP5. CMIP6 often shows larger absolute and relative model uncertainty than CMIP5, although part of this difference can be reconciled with the higher average transient climate response in CMIP6. This study demonstrates the added value of a collection of SMILEs for quantifying and diagnosing uncertainty in climate projections.</p>
url https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/11/491/2020/esd-11-491-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT flehner partitioningclimateprojectionuncertaintywithmultiplelargeensemblesandcmip56
AT flehner partitioningclimateprojectionuncertaintywithmultiplelargeensemblesandcmip56
AT cdeser partitioningclimateprojectionuncertaintywithmultiplelargeensemblesandcmip56
AT nmaher partitioningclimateprojectionuncertaintywithmultiplelargeensemblesandcmip56
AT jmarotzke partitioningclimateprojectionuncertaintywithmultiplelargeensemblesandcmip56
AT emfischer partitioningclimateprojectionuncertaintywithmultiplelargeensemblesandcmip56
AT lbrunner partitioningclimateprojectionuncertaintywithmultiplelargeensemblesandcmip56
AT rknutti partitioningclimateprojectionuncertaintywithmultiplelargeensemblesandcmip56
AT ehawkins partitioningclimateprojectionuncertaintywithmultiplelargeensemblesandcmip56
_version_ 1724489348378787840