Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change

Manipulative experiments and observations along environmental gradients, the two most common approaches to evaluate the impacts of climate change on nutrient cycling, are generally assumed to produce similar results, but this assumption has rarely been tested. We did so by conducting a meta-analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZY Yuan, F Jiao, XR Shi, Jordi Sardans, Fernando T Maestre, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, Peter B Reich, Josep Peñuelas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2017-06-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/23255
id doaj-fc7945b68bef4542a2edde2f30c43781
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc7945b68bef4542a2edde2f30c437812021-05-05T13:31:05ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2017-06-01610.7554/eLife.23255Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate changeZY Yuan0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-3226F Jiao1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-4856XR Shi2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3963-9269Jordi Sardans3Fernando T Maestre4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-4856Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo5Peter B Reich6Josep Peñuelas7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-0150State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Science and Ministry of Water Resource, Yangling, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Science and Ministry of Water Resource, Yangling, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Science and Ministry of Water Resource, Yangling, ChinaGlobal Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Bellaterra, Spain; CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, SpainDepartamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, SpainDepartamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, ColoradoHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, Australia; Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, United StatesGlobal Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Bellaterra, Spain; CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, SpainManipulative experiments and observations along environmental gradients, the two most common approaches to evaluate the impacts of climate change on nutrient cycling, are generally assumed to produce similar results, but this assumption has rarely been tested. We did so by conducting a meta-analysis and found that soil nutrients responded differentially to drivers of climate change depending on the approach considered. Soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentrations generally decreased with water addition in manipulative experiments but increased with annual precipitation along environmental gradients. Different patterns were also observed between warming experiments and temperature gradients. Our findings provide evidence of inconsistent results and suggest that manipulative experiments may be better predictors of the causal impacts of short-term (months to years) climate change on soil nutrients but environmental gradients may provide better information for long-term correlations (centuries to millennia) between these nutrients and climatic features. Ecosystem models should consequently incorporate both experimental and observational data to properly assess the impacts of climate change on nutrient cycling.https://elifesciences.org/articles/23255biogeochemistrycarbonclimate changesoil nutrientnitrogenprecipitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author ZY Yuan
F Jiao
XR Shi
Jordi Sardans
Fernando T Maestre
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Peter B Reich
Josep Peñuelas
spellingShingle ZY Yuan
F Jiao
XR Shi
Jordi Sardans
Fernando T Maestre
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Peter B Reich
Josep Peñuelas
Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change
eLife
biogeochemistry
carbon
climate change
soil nutrient
nitrogen
precipitation
author_facet ZY Yuan
F Jiao
XR Shi
Jordi Sardans
Fernando T Maestre
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo
Peter B Reich
Josep Peñuelas
author_sort ZY Yuan
title Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change
title_short Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change
title_full Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change
title_fullStr Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change
title_full_unstemmed Experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change
title_sort experimental and observational studies find contrasting responses of soil nutrients to climate change
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
series eLife
issn 2050-084X
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Manipulative experiments and observations along environmental gradients, the two most common approaches to evaluate the impacts of climate change on nutrient cycling, are generally assumed to produce similar results, but this assumption has rarely been tested. We did so by conducting a meta-analysis and found that soil nutrients responded differentially to drivers of climate change depending on the approach considered. Soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentrations generally decreased with water addition in manipulative experiments but increased with annual precipitation along environmental gradients. Different patterns were also observed between warming experiments and temperature gradients. Our findings provide evidence of inconsistent results and suggest that manipulative experiments may be better predictors of the causal impacts of short-term (months to years) climate change on soil nutrients but environmental gradients may provide better information for long-term correlations (centuries to millennia) between these nutrients and climatic features. Ecosystem models should consequently incorporate both experimental and observational data to properly assess the impacts of climate change on nutrient cycling.
topic biogeochemistry
carbon
climate change
soil nutrient
nitrogen
precipitation
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/23255
work_keys_str_mv AT zyyuan experimentalandobservationalstudiesfindcontrastingresponsesofsoilnutrientstoclimatechange
AT fjiao experimentalandobservationalstudiesfindcontrastingresponsesofsoilnutrientstoclimatechange
AT xrshi experimentalandobservationalstudiesfindcontrastingresponsesofsoilnutrientstoclimatechange
AT jordisardans experimentalandobservationalstudiesfindcontrastingresponsesofsoilnutrientstoclimatechange
AT fernandotmaestre experimentalandobservationalstudiesfindcontrastingresponsesofsoilnutrientstoclimatechange
AT manueldelgadobaquerizo experimentalandobservationalstudiesfindcontrastingresponsesofsoilnutrientstoclimatechange
AT peterbreich experimentalandobservationalstudiesfindcontrastingresponsesofsoilnutrientstoclimatechange
AT joseppenuelas experimentalandobservationalstudiesfindcontrastingresponsesofsoilnutrientstoclimatechange
_version_ 1721461951711674368