The influence of temperature calibration on the OC–EC results from a dual-optics thermal carbon analyzer
Thermal–optical analysis (TOA) is a widely used technique that fractionates carbonaceous aerosol particles into organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC), or carbonate. Thermal sub-fractions of evolved OC and EC are also used for source identification and apportionment; thus, oven temperature accurac...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2014-09-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
Online Access: | http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/7/2829/2014/amt-7-2829-2014.pdf |
id |
doaj-fc6d32c6d9004123b91af751b7ecba25 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fc6d32c6d9004123b91af751b7ecba252020-11-24T20:43:35ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482014-09-01792829283810.5194/amt-7-2829-2014The influence of temperature calibration on the OC–EC results from a dual-optics thermal carbon analyzerJ. Pavlovic0J. S. Kinsey1M. D. Hays2Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USAUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USAUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USAThermal–optical analysis (TOA) is a widely used technique that fractionates carbonaceous aerosol particles into organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC), or carbonate. Thermal sub-fractions of evolved OC and EC are also used for source identification and apportionment; thus, oven temperature accuracy during TOA analysis is essential. Evidence now indicates that the "actual" sample (filter) temperature and the temperature measured by the built-in oven thermocouple (or set-point temperature) can differ by as much as 50 °C. This difference can affect the OC–EC split point selection and consequently the OC and EC fraction and sub-fraction concentrations being reported, depending on the sample composition and in-use TOA method and instrument. The present study systematically investigates the influence of an oven temperature calibration procedure for TOA. A dual-optical carbon analyzer that simultaneously measures transmission and reflectance (TOT and TOR) is used, functioning under the conditions of both the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Method 5040 (NIOSH) and Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment (IMPROVE) protocols. The application of the oven calibration procedure to our dual-optics instrument significantly changed NIOSH 5040 carbon fractions (OC and EC) and the IMPROVE OC fraction. In addition, the well-known OC–EC split difference between NIOSH and IMPROVE methods is even further perturbed following the instrument calibration. Further study is needed to determine if the widespread application of this oven temperature calibration procedure will indeed improve accuracy and our ability to compare among carbonaceous aerosol studies that use TOA.http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/7/2829/2014/amt-7-2829-2014.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J. Pavlovic J. S. Kinsey M. D. Hays |
spellingShingle |
J. Pavlovic J. S. Kinsey M. D. Hays The influence of temperature calibration on the OC–EC results from a dual-optics thermal carbon analyzer Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
author_facet |
J. Pavlovic J. S. Kinsey M. D. Hays |
author_sort |
J. Pavlovic |
title |
The influence of temperature calibration on the OC–EC results from a dual-optics thermal carbon analyzer |
title_short |
The influence of temperature calibration on the OC–EC results from a dual-optics thermal carbon analyzer |
title_full |
The influence of temperature calibration on the OC–EC results from a dual-optics thermal carbon analyzer |
title_fullStr |
The influence of temperature calibration on the OC–EC results from a dual-optics thermal carbon analyzer |
title_full_unstemmed |
The influence of temperature calibration on the OC–EC results from a dual-optics thermal carbon analyzer |
title_sort |
influence of temperature calibration on the oc–ec results from a dual-optics thermal carbon analyzer |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
issn |
1867-1381 1867-8548 |
publishDate |
2014-09-01 |
description |
Thermal–optical analysis (TOA) is a widely used technique that fractionates
carbonaceous aerosol particles into organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC),
or carbonate. Thermal sub-fractions of evolved OC and EC are also used for
source identification and apportionment; thus, oven temperature accuracy
during TOA analysis is essential. Evidence now indicates that the "actual"
sample (filter) temperature and the temperature measured by the built-in oven
thermocouple (or set-point temperature) can differ by as much as
50 °C. This difference can affect the OC–EC split point selection and
consequently the OC and EC fraction and sub-fraction concentrations being
reported, depending on the sample composition and in-use TOA method and
instrument. The present study systematically investigates the influence of an
oven temperature calibration procedure for TOA. A dual-optical carbon
analyzer that simultaneously measures transmission and reflectance (TOT and
TOR) is used, functioning under the conditions of both the National Institute of Occupational Safety and
Health Method 5040 (NIOSH) and
Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment (IMPROVE) protocols. The application of the oven calibration procedure to our dual-optics instrument significantly changed NIOSH 5040 carbon fractions (OC and
EC) and the IMPROVE OC fraction. In addition, the well-known OC–EC split
difference between NIOSH and IMPROVE methods is even further perturbed
following the instrument calibration. Further study is needed to determine if
the widespread application of this oven temperature calibration procedure
will indeed improve accuracy and our ability to compare among carbonaceous
aerosol studies that use TOA. |
url |
http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/7/2829/2014/amt-7-2829-2014.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jpavlovic theinfluenceoftemperaturecalibrationontheocecresultsfromadualopticsthermalcarbonanalyzer AT jskinsey theinfluenceoftemperaturecalibrationontheocecresultsfromadualopticsthermalcarbonanalyzer AT mdhays theinfluenceoftemperaturecalibrationontheocecresultsfromadualopticsthermalcarbonanalyzer AT jpavlovic influenceoftemperaturecalibrationontheocecresultsfromadualopticsthermalcarbonanalyzer AT jskinsey influenceoftemperaturecalibrationontheocecresultsfromadualopticsthermalcarbonanalyzer AT mdhays influenceoftemperaturecalibrationontheocecresultsfromadualopticsthermalcarbonanalyzer |
_version_ |
1716819503205056512 |