L’aca-fan : aspects méthodologiques, éthiques et pratiques

Since Henry Jenkins’s seminal works, the study of fan communities has been developing in the English-speaking world, and more recently in France. However, it confronts scholars with a basic problem, reminiscent of dilemmas encountered by ethnologists: how can one reconcile critical distance with bei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cécile Cristofari, Matthieu J. Guitton
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Société Française de Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication 2015-09-01
Series:Revue Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/1651
id doaj-fc69443d589e4cdbaa42ec12b6ea2891
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc69443d589e4cdbaa42ec12b6ea28912020-11-24T23:56:10ZfraSociété Française de Sciences de l’Information et de la CommunicationRevue Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication2263-08562015-09-01710.4000/rfsic.1651L’aca-fan : aspects méthodologiques, éthiques et pratiquesCécile CristofariMatthieu J. GuittonSince Henry Jenkins’s seminal works, the study of fan communities has been developing in the English-speaking world, and more recently in France. However, it confronts scholars with a basic problem, reminiscent of dilemmas encountered by ethnologists: how can one reconcile critical distance with being sufficiently immersed within a given community to gather reliable information? This problem has led to the emergence of a particular category of scholars, referred to as “aca-fans”, a scholarly positioning which raises a number of theoretical, ethical and practical questions. It is not enough for an academic to identify as a member of a fan community to penetrate it; conversely, even the most erudite fans do not implicitly have an academic legitimacy regarding the analysis of their community. Consequently, reconciling both points of view is complex but necessary work. Although fans and academics are often part of the same broader culture, their discourses are not equivalent, given that academics need to retain an anthropological neutrality on the community they study, whether they are part of it or not. Furthermore, the study of fan communities cannot be synonymous with outright appropriation, regardless of the expectations of the fans themselves, who might legitimately wish to have their say on the way their practices are described and used. Finally, aca-fans need to consider the practical modalities of their research, the fields studied and the existing representations of the community they study. This paper aims to synthesise those questions, and to propose a theoretical and methodological conception of the aca-fan’s role.http://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/1651aca-fanfan communitiesmethodologyparticipant observationresearch ethics
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cécile Cristofari
Matthieu J. Guitton
spellingShingle Cécile Cristofari
Matthieu J. Guitton
L’aca-fan : aspects méthodologiques, éthiques et pratiques
Revue Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication
aca-fan
fan communities
methodology
participant observation
research ethics
author_facet Cécile Cristofari
Matthieu J. Guitton
author_sort Cécile Cristofari
title L’aca-fan : aspects méthodologiques, éthiques et pratiques
title_short L’aca-fan : aspects méthodologiques, éthiques et pratiques
title_full L’aca-fan : aspects méthodologiques, éthiques et pratiques
title_fullStr L’aca-fan : aspects méthodologiques, éthiques et pratiques
title_full_unstemmed L’aca-fan : aspects méthodologiques, éthiques et pratiques
title_sort l’aca-fan : aspects méthodologiques, éthiques et pratiques
publisher Société Française de Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication
series Revue Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication
issn 2263-0856
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Since Henry Jenkins’s seminal works, the study of fan communities has been developing in the English-speaking world, and more recently in France. However, it confronts scholars with a basic problem, reminiscent of dilemmas encountered by ethnologists: how can one reconcile critical distance with being sufficiently immersed within a given community to gather reliable information? This problem has led to the emergence of a particular category of scholars, referred to as “aca-fans”, a scholarly positioning which raises a number of theoretical, ethical and practical questions. It is not enough for an academic to identify as a member of a fan community to penetrate it; conversely, even the most erudite fans do not implicitly have an academic legitimacy regarding the analysis of their community. Consequently, reconciling both points of view is complex but necessary work. Although fans and academics are often part of the same broader culture, their discourses are not equivalent, given that academics need to retain an anthropological neutrality on the community they study, whether they are part of it or not. Furthermore, the study of fan communities cannot be synonymous with outright appropriation, regardless of the expectations of the fans themselves, who might legitimately wish to have their say on the way their practices are described and used. Finally, aca-fans need to consider the practical modalities of their research, the fields studied and the existing representations of the community they study. This paper aims to synthesise those questions, and to propose a theoretical and methodological conception of the aca-fan’s role.
topic aca-fan
fan communities
methodology
participant observation
research ethics
url http://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/1651
work_keys_str_mv AT cecilecristofari lacafanaspectsmethodologiquesethiquesetpratiques
AT matthieujguitton lacafanaspectsmethodologiquesethiquesetpratiques
_version_ 1725459233333313536