Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS® (6‐phytase) as a feed additive for finfish
Abstract The additive OPTIPHOS® is a preparation of 6‐phytase that is authorised for use in avian species, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows. The applicant seeks for an extension of use of the product to finfish, at a dose range between 250 and 1,000 OTU/kg feed. The FEEDAP Panel concluded...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2017-04-01
|
Series: | EFSA Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4763 |
id |
doaj-fc617c762728414aaa0e335d1924d3d0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fc617c762728414aaa0e335d1924d3d02021-04-22T11:40:31ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322017-04-01154n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4763Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS® (6‐phytase) as a feed additive for finfishEFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)Guido RychenGabriele AquilinaGiovanna AzimontiVasileios BampidisMaria de Lourdes BastosGeorges BoriesAndrew ChessonPier Sandro CocconcelliGerhard FlachowskyJürgen GroppBoris KolarMaryline KoubaMarta López AlonsoSecundino López PuenteAlberto MantovaniBaltasar MayoFernando RamosMaria SaarelaRoberto Edoardo VillaRobert John WallacePieter WesterPaul BrantomNoël Albert DierickMontserrat AnguitaAbstract The additive OPTIPHOS® is a preparation of 6‐phytase that is authorised for use in avian species, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows. The applicant seeks for an extension of use of the product to finfish, at a dose range between 250 and 1,000 OTU/kg feed. The FEEDAP Panel concluded in a previous opinion that there are no concerns for consumer safety and no risks for the environment are expected from the use of the product as feed additive. Moreover, it was concluded that the additive is not a skin/eye irritant or a skin sensitiser, but has the potential to be a respiratory sensitiser. The Panel considered that the new use of the additive would not change the previous conclusions regarding the safety for the consumer, user and environment. The results of a tolerance study performed in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) showed no negative effects of the additive on the fish when offered up to 100 times the maximum recommended dose. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the additive is safe for the rainbow trout and extrapolated this conclusion to all finfish. The Panel evaluated three efficacy trials, two performed in rainbow trout and one in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). In these studies, the performance of the fish was monitored as well as phosphorus digestibility and phosphorus retention parameters. In the three trials, the performance and the phosphorus retention were improved by the additive at the lowest tested dose (in rainbow trouts at 250 OTU/kg feed and in Atlantic salmon at 500 OTU/kg feed). The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive has a potential to be efficacious in rainbow trout and salmon at 500 OTU/kg. The Panel extrapolated the conclusion to all finfish species.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4763safetyefficacyzootechnical additivesdigestibility enhancers6‐phytasefish |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) Guido Rychen Gabriele Aquilina Giovanna Azimonti Vasileios Bampidis Maria de Lourdes Bastos Georges Bories Andrew Chesson Pier Sandro Cocconcelli Gerhard Flachowsky Jürgen Gropp Boris Kolar Maryline Kouba Marta López Alonso Secundino López Puente Alberto Mantovani Baltasar Mayo Fernando Ramos Maria Saarela Roberto Edoardo Villa Robert John Wallace Pieter Wester Paul Brantom Noël Albert Dierick Montserrat Anguita |
spellingShingle |
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) Guido Rychen Gabriele Aquilina Giovanna Azimonti Vasileios Bampidis Maria de Lourdes Bastos Georges Bories Andrew Chesson Pier Sandro Cocconcelli Gerhard Flachowsky Jürgen Gropp Boris Kolar Maryline Kouba Marta López Alonso Secundino López Puente Alberto Mantovani Baltasar Mayo Fernando Ramos Maria Saarela Roberto Edoardo Villa Robert John Wallace Pieter Wester Paul Brantom Noël Albert Dierick Montserrat Anguita Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS® (6‐phytase) as a feed additive for finfish EFSA Journal safety efficacy zootechnical additives digestibility enhancers 6‐phytase fish |
author_facet |
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) Guido Rychen Gabriele Aquilina Giovanna Azimonti Vasileios Bampidis Maria de Lourdes Bastos Georges Bories Andrew Chesson Pier Sandro Cocconcelli Gerhard Flachowsky Jürgen Gropp Boris Kolar Maryline Kouba Marta López Alonso Secundino López Puente Alberto Mantovani Baltasar Mayo Fernando Ramos Maria Saarela Roberto Edoardo Villa Robert John Wallace Pieter Wester Paul Brantom Noël Albert Dierick Montserrat Anguita |
author_sort |
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) |
title |
Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS® (6‐phytase) as a feed additive for finfish |
title_short |
Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS® (6‐phytase) as a feed additive for finfish |
title_full |
Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS® (6‐phytase) as a feed additive for finfish |
title_fullStr |
Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS® (6‐phytase) as a feed additive for finfish |
title_full_unstemmed |
Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS® (6‐phytase) as a feed additive for finfish |
title_sort |
safety and efficacy of optiphos® (6‐phytase) as a feed additive for finfish |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
EFSA Journal |
issn |
1831-4732 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
Abstract The additive OPTIPHOS® is a preparation of 6‐phytase that is authorised for use in avian species, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows. The applicant seeks for an extension of use of the product to finfish, at a dose range between 250 and 1,000 OTU/kg feed. The FEEDAP Panel concluded in a previous opinion that there are no concerns for consumer safety and no risks for the environment are expected from the use of the product as feed additive. Moreover, it was concluded that the additive is not a skin/eye irritant or a skin sensitiser, but has the potential to be a respiratory sensitiser. The Panel considered that the new use of the additive would not change the previous conclusions regarding the safety for the consumer, user and environment. The results of a tolerance study performed in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) showed no negative effects of the additive on the fish when offered up to 100 times the maximum recommended dose. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the additive is safe for the rainbow trout and extrapolated this conclusion to all finfish. The Panel evaluated three efficacy trials, two performed in rainbow trout and one in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). In these studies, the performance of the fish was monitored as well as phosphorus digestibility and phosphorus retention parameters. In the three trials, the performance and the phosphorus retention were improved by the additive at the lowest tested dose (in rainbow trouts at 250 OTU/kg feed and in Atlantic salmon at 500 OTU/kg feed). The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive has a potential to be efficacious in rainbow trout and salmon at 500 OTU/kg. The Panel extrapolated the conclusion to all finfish species. |
topic |
safety efficacy zootechnical additives digestibility enhancers 6‐phytase fish |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4763 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT efsapanelonadditivesandproductsorsubstancesusedinanimalfeedfeedap safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT guidorychen safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT gabrieleaquilina safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT giovannaazimonti safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT vasileiosbampidis safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT mariadelourdesbastos safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT georgesbories safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT andrewchesson safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT piersandrococconcelli safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT gerhardflachowsky safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT jurgengropp safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT boriskolar safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT marylinekouba safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT martalopezalonso safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT secundinolopezpuente safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT albertomantovani safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT baltasarmayo safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT fernandoramos safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT mariasaarela safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT robertoedoardovilla safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT robertjohnwallace safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT pieterwester safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT paulbrantom safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT noelalbertdierick safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish AT montserratanguita safetyandefficacyofoptiphos6phytaseasafeedadditiveforfinfish |
_version_ |
1721514627208052736 |