The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review

Abstract Background The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, banned characterizing flavors in cigarettes; however, mentholated tobacco products were exempt. Since 2009, over 20 US jurisdictions and numerous countries...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher J. Cadham, Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero, Nancy L. Fleischer, Ritesh Mistry, Jana L. Hirschtick, Rafael Meza, David T. Levy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09055-z
id doaj-fc4c6f361f7e441bad55408d035737fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc4c6f361f7e441bad55408d035737fb2020-11-25T03:48:25ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582020-07-0120111710.1186/s12889-020-09055-zThe actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping reviewChristopher J. Cadham0Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero1Nancy L. Fleischer2Ritesh Mistry3Jana L. Hirschtick4Rafael Meza5David T. Levy6Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control ProgramGeorgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control ProgramDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public HealthDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public HealthDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public HealthDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public HealthGeorgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control ProgramAbstract Background The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, banned characterizing flavors in cigarettes; however, mentholated tobacco products were exempt. Since 2009, over 20 US jurisdictions and numerous countries around the world have extended this restriction to menthol. Currently, the FDA is reconsidering its position on a nation-wide menthol cigarette ban. However, the effects of such a ban remain unclear. We conducted a scoping review to explore the impact of a menthol cigarette ban on individual behaviors (initiation, cessation, and product switching), sales, and compliance. Methods We conducted a search of the international literature using PubMed, EBSCO, and Web of Science (to November 25, 2019). We retrieved articles relevant to the impacts of an implemented or hypothetical menthol ban. We also included studies of flavored tobacco product bans due to their potential relevance in gauging compliance and product substitutability. Results The search identified 493 articles, of which 24 were included. Studies examined the effects of implemented menthol bans (n = 6), hypothetical menthol bans (n = 12) and implemented flavor bans that exclude menthol (n = 6). Menthol bans were found to reduce sales and increase smoking cessation with only partial substitution for non-menthol cigarettes. US smokers’ reactions to a hypothetical ban indicate that about 25–64% would attempt to quit smoking and 11–46% would consider switching to other tobacco products, including 15–30% to e-cigarettes. Flavor ban studies indicate reductions in initiation of 6%. Ban compliance was high, but studies indicate that the tobacco industry and retailers have attempted to circumvent their impact via packaging changes and online sales. Conclusion Our review finds that extending the US cigarette flavor ban to menthol products would promote smoking cessation and reduce initiation. This evidence supports further action by the FDA towards mentholated tobacco products. However, few studies have been conducted in the vaping era.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09055-zMenthol cigarettesTobacco regulationScoping review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher J. Cadham
Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero
Nancy L. Fleischer
Ritesh Mistry
Jana L. Hirschtick
Rafael Meza
David T. Levy
spellingShingle Christopher J. Cadham
Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero
Nancy L. Fleischer
Ritesh Mistry
Jana L. Hirschtick
Rafael Meza
David T. Levy
The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review
BMC Public Health
Menthol cigarettes
Tobacco regulation
Scoping review
author_facet Christopher J. Cadham
Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero
Nancy L. Fleischer
Ritesh Mistry
Jana L. Hirschtick
Rafael Meza
David T. Levy
author_sort Christopher J. Cadham
title The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review
title_short The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review
title_full The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review
title_fullStr The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review
title_sort actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Background The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, banned characterizing flavors in cigarettes; however, mentholated tobacco products were exempt. Since 2009, over 20 US jurisdictions and numerous countries around the world have extended this restriction to menthol. Currently, the FDA is reconsidering its position on a nation-wide menthol cigarette ban. However, the effects of such a ban remain unclear. We conducted a scoping review to explore the impact of a menthol cigarette ban on individual behaviors (initiation, cessation, and product switching), sales, and compliance. Methods We conducted a search of the international literature using PubMed, EBSCO, and Web of Science (to November 25, 2019). We retrieved articles relevant to the impacts of an implemented or hypothetical menthol ban. We also included studies of flavored tobacco product bans due to their potential relevance in gauging compliance and product substitutability. Results The search identified 493 articles, of which 24 were included. Studies examined the effects of implemented menthol bans (n = 6), hypothetical menthol bans (n = 12) and implemented flavor bans that exclude menthol (n = 6). Menthol bans were found to reduce sales and increase smoking cessation with only partial substitution for non-menthol cigarettes. US smokers’ reactions to a hypothetical ban indicate that about 25–64% would attempt to quit smoking and 11–46% would consider switching to other tobacco products, including 15–30% to e-cigarettes. Flavor ban studies indicate reductions in initiation of 6%. Ban compliance was high, but studies indicate that the tobacco industry and retailers have attempted to circumvent their impact via packaging changes and online sales. Conclusion Our review finds that extending the US cigarette flavor ban to menthol products would promote smoking cessation and reduce initiation. This evidence supports further action by the FDA towards mentholated tobacco products. However, few studies have been conducted in the vaping era.
topic Menthol cigarettes
Tobacco regulation
Scoping review
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09055-z
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherjcadham theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT luzmariasanchezromero theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT nancylfleischer theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT riteshmistry theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT janalhirschtick theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT rafaelmeza theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT davidtlevy theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT christopherjcadham actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT luzmariasanchezromero actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT nancylfleischer actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT riteshmistry actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT janalhirschtick actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT rafaelmeza actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
AT davidtlevy actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview
_version_ 1724499259222392832