The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review
Abstract Background The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, banned characterizing flavors in cigarettes; however, mentholated tobacco products were exempt. Since 2009, over 20 US jurisdictions and numerous countries...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09055-z |
id |
doaj-fc4c6f361f7e441bad55408d035737fb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fc4c6f361f7e441bad55408d035737fb2020-11-25T03:48:25ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582020-07-0120111710.1186/s12889-020-09055-zThe actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping reviewChristopher J. Cadham0Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero1Nancy L. Fleischer2Ritesh Mistry3Jana L. Hirschtick4Rafael Meza5David T. Levy6Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control ProgramGeorgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control ProgramDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public HealthDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public HealthDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public HealthDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public HealthGeorgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control ProgramAbstract Background The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, banned characterizing flavors in cigarettes; however, mentholated tobacco products were exempt. Since 2009, over 20 US jurisdictions and numerous countries around the world have extended this restriction to menthol. Currently, the FDA is reconsidering its position on a nation-wide menthol cigarette ban. However, the effects of such a ban remain unclear. We conducted a scoping review to explore the impact of a menthol cigarette ban on individual behaviors (initiation, cessation, and product switching), sales, and compliance. Methods We conducted a search of the international literature using PubMed, EBSCO, and Web of Science (to November 25, 2019). We retrieved articles relevant to the impacts of an implemented or hypothetical menthol ban. We also included studies of flavored tobacco product bans due to their potential relevance in gauging compliance and product substitutability. Results The search identified 493 articles, of which 24 were included. Studies examined the effects of implemented menthol bans (n = 6), hypothetical menthol bans (n = 12) and implemented flavor bans that exclude menthol (n = 6). Menthol bans were found to reduce sales and increase smoking cessation with only partial substitution for non-menthol cigarettes. US smokers’ reactions to a hypothetical ban indicate that about 25–64% would attempt to quit smoking and 11–46% would consider switching to other tobacco products, including 15–30% to e-cigarettes. Flavor ban studies indicate reductions in initiation of 6%. Ban compliance was high, but studies indicate that the tobacco industry and retailers have attempted to circumvent their impact via packaging changes and online sales. Conclusion Our review finds that extending the US cigarette flavor ban to menthol products would promote smoking cessation and reduce initiation. This evidence supports further action by the FDA towards mentholated tobacco products. However, few studies have been conducted in the vaping era.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09055-zMenthol cigarettesTobacco regulationScoping review |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christopher J. Cadham Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero Nancy L. Fleischer Ritesh Mistry Jana L. Hirschtick Rafael Meza David T. Levy |
spellingShingle |
Christopher J. Cadham Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero Nancy L. Fleischer Ritesh Mistry Jana L. Hirschtick Rafael Meza David T. Levy The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review BMC Public Health Menthol cigarettes Tobacco regulation Scoping review |
author_facet |
Christopher J. Cadham Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero Nancy L. Fleischer Ritesh Mistry Jana L. Hirschtick Rafael Meza David T. Levy |
author_sort |
Christopher J. Cadham |
title |
The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review |
title_short |
The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review |
title_full |
The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review |
title_fullStr |
The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review |
title_sort |
actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, banned characterizing flavors in cigarettes; however, mentholated tobacco products were exempt. Since 2009, over 20 US jurisdictions and numerous countries around the world have extended this restriction to menthol. Currently, the FDA is reconsidering its position on a nation-wide menthol cigarette ban. However, the effects of such a ban remain unclear. We conducted a scoping review to explore the impact of a menthol cigarette ban on individual behaviors (initiation, cessation, and product switching), sales, and compliance. Methods We conducted a search of the international literature using PubMed, EBSCO, and Web of Science (to November 25, 2019). We retrieved articles relevant to the impacts of an implemented or hypothetical menthol ban. We also included studies of flavored tobacco product bans due to their potential relevance in gauging compliance and product substitutability. Results The search identified 493 articles, of which 24 were included. Studies examined the effects of implemented menthol bans (n = 6), hypothetical menthol bans (n = 12) and implemented flavor bans that exclude menthol (n = 6). Menthol bans were found to reduce sales and increase smoking cessation with only partial substitution for non-menthol cigarettes. US smokers’ reactions to a hypothetical ban indicate that about 25–64% would attempt to quit smoking and 11–46% would consider switching to other tobacco products, including 15–30% to e-cigarettes. Flavor ban studies indicate reductions in initiation of 6%. Ban compliance was high, but studies indicate that the tobacco industry and retailers have attempted to circumvent their impact via packaging changes and online sales. Conclusion Our review finds that extending the US cigarette flavor ban to menthol products would promote smoking cessation and reduce initiation. This evidence supports further action by the FDA towards mentholated tobacco products. However, few studies have been conducted in the vaping era. |
topic |
Menthol cigarettes Tobacco regulation Scoping review |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-020-09055-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christopherjcadham theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT luzmariasanchezromero theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT nancylfleischer theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT riteshmistry theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT janalhirschtick theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT rafaelmeza theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT davidtlevy theactualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT christopherjcadham actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT luzmariasanchezromero actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT nancylfleischer actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT riteshmistry actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT janalhirschtick actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT rafaelmeza actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview AT davidtlevy actualandanticipatedeffectsofamentholcigarettebanascopingreview |
_version_ |
1724499259222392832 |