The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Comment

This article discusses Nate Breznau’s critique of Brooks and Manza’s "Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies." Brooks and Manza found that public opinion influenced welfare state spending, but Breznau argued that this conclusion was an artifact of their model, which included...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David L. Weakliem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Sociological Science 2016-02-01
Series:Sociological Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v3-6-109/
id doaj-fc295581b8294c04be6e64d2a2a763a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc295581b8294c04be6e64d2a2a763a52020-11-24T22:23:58ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962330-66962016-02-013610911510.15195/v3.a63192The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A CommentDavid L. Weakliem0 University of Connecticut This article discusses Nate Breznau’s critique of Brooks and Manza’s "Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies." Brooks and Manza found that public opinion influenced welfare state spending, but Breznau argued that this conclusion was an artifact of their model, which included an interaction between opinion and welfare state type but omitted the main effect of welfare state type. Breznau is correct in saying that interactions should not be used without including the main effect, except in rare circumstances which do not apply in this case. However, the classification of welfare state type is made partly on the basis of the dependent variable, welfare spending, so it should not be used as an independent variable. There is, however, a case for including a variable for the type of legal system (common law or civil law), which is correlated with welfare state type. The estimates from a regression including both main and interaction effects support Brooks’s and Manza’s original conclusions about the effect of public opinion. The paper concludes by discussing the strength of the evidence provided by the data.https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v3-6-109/Interaction EffectsPolicy ResponsivenessReplicationWelfare State
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David L. Weakliem
spellingShingle David L. Weakliem
The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Comment
Sociological Science
Interaction Effects
Policy Responsiveness
Replication
Welfare State
author_facet David L. Weakliem
author_sort David L. Weakliem
title The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Comment
title_short The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Comment
title_full The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Comment
title_fullStr The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Comment
title_full_unstemmed The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Comment
title_sort missing main effect of welfare state regimes: a comment
publisher Society for Sociological Science
series Sociological Science
issn 2330-6696
2330-6696
publishDate 2016-02-01
description This article discusses Nate Breznau’s critique of Brooks and Manza’s "Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies." Brooks and Manza found that public opinion influenced welfare state spending, but Breznau argued that this conclusion was an artifact of their model, which included an interaction between opinion and welfare state type but omitted the main effect of welfare state type. Breznau is correct in saying that interactions should not be used without including the main effect, except in rare circumstances which do not apply in this case. However, the classification of welfare state type is made partly on the basis of the dependent variable, welfare spending, so it should not be used as an independent variable. There is, however, a case for including a variable for the type of legal system (common law or civil law), which is correlated with welfare state type. The estimates from a regression including both main and interaction effects support Brooks’s and Manza’s original conclusions about the effect of public opinion. The paper concludes by discussing the strength of the evidence provided by the data.
topic Interaction Effects
Policy Responsiveness
Replication
Welfare State
url https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v3-6-109/
work_keys_str_mv AT davidlweakliem themissingmaineffectofwelfarestateregimesacomment
AT davidlweakliem missingmaineffectofwelfarestateregimesacomment
_version_ 1725763043390914560