EXPLORING THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK BIOMEDICAL CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK

The interaction diversity within the communities of living matter, from bacterial colonies to human societies, makes them inherently more complex than ensembles of particles in inanimate nature. Co-authorship networks are a particular case of intra- and inter-group social interactions. In this paper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. I. Titov, A. A. Blinov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2015-01-01
Series:Vavilovskij Žurnal Genetiki i Selekcii
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/324
id doaj-fc1bb84977624346ac19176c346881f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc1bb84977624346ac19176c346881f22021-09-11T08:41:15ZengInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesVavilovskij Žurnal Genetiki i Selekcii2500-04622500-32592015-01-01184/2939944307EXPLORING THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK BIOMEDICAL CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORKI. I. Titov0A. A. Blinov1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk National Research State University, Novosibirsk, RussiaNovosibirsk National Research State University, Novosibirsk, RussiaThe interaction diversity within the communities of living matter, from bacterial colonies to human societies, makes them inherently more complex than ensembles of particles in inanimate nature. Co-authorship networks are a particular case of intra- and inter-group social interactions. In this paper, we analyze the Novosibirsk biomedical scientific community as an example of such a network. Using the PubMed database, we have built a community network and calculated its statistics. The distribution of organizations by scientific activity has a fat tail and obeys the Pareto principle: 83% of publications and 75% of authors belong to the 20% of the most active organizations. A comparison of their networks shows that networks of the universities have a more pronounced core rather than those of research institutions. We have plotted the “demographic” structure of currently active authors and found out two facts: (1) an abundance of authors with short “publication experience” and (2) a deficit of authors whose first publication is dated back to 1991-1997. In general, the network dynamics is non-steady, and the activity tends to increase.https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/324co-authorship networknetwork structurenetwork evolutionstatistical analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I. I. Titov
A. A. Blinov
spellingShingle I. I. Titov
A. A. Blinov
EXPLORING THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK BIOMEDICAL CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK
Vavilovskij Žurnal Genetiki i Selekcii
co-authorship network
network structure
network evolution
statistical analysis
author_facet I. I. Titov
A. A. Blinov
author_sort I. I. Titov
title EXPLORING THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK BIOMEDICAL CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK
title_short EXPLORING THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK BIOMEDICAL CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK
title_full EXPLORING THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK BIOMEDICAL CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK
title_fullStr EXPLORING THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK BIOMEDICAL CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK
title_full_unstemmed EXPLORING THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK BIOMEDICAL CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK
title_sort exploring the structure and evolution of the novosibirsk biomedical co-authorship network
publisher Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Vavilovskij Žurnal Genetiki i Selekcii
issn 2500-0462
2500-3259
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The interaction diversity within the communities of living matter, from bacterial colonies to human societies, makes them inherently more complex than ensembles of particles in inanimate nature. Co-authorship networks are a particular case of intra- and inter-group social interactions. In this paper, we analyze the Novosibirsk biomedical scientific community as an example of such a network. Using the PubMed database, we have built a community network and calculated its statistics. The distribution of organizations by scientific activity has a fat tail and obeys the Pareto principle: 83% of publications and 75% of authors belong to the 20% of the most active organizations. A comparison of their networks shows that networks of the universities have a more pronounced core rather than those of research institutions. We have plotted the “demographic” structure of currently active authors and found out two facts: (1) an abundance of authors with short “publication experience” and (2) a deficit of authors whose first publication is dated back to 1991-1997. In general, the network dynamics is non-steady, and the activity tends to increase.
topic co-authorship network
network structure
network evolution
statistical analysis
url https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/324
work_keys_str_mv AT iititov exploringthestructureandevolutionofthenovosibirskbiomedicalcoauthorshipnetwork
AT aablinov exploringthestructureandevolutionofthenovosibirskbiomedicalcoauthorshipnetwork
_version_ 1717756784707371008