Is the NPT Still Relevant? – How to Progress the NPT’s Disarmament Provisions

The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is the cornerstone of the global non-proliferation regime. However, the question is the NPT still relevant? may suggest that the importance of NPT has been forgotten. Indeed, lack of progress in nuclear disarmament has led some critics to question the value of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Carlson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1611187
id doaj-fc02df2403034c8796e41930271b0e5a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fc02df2403034c8796e41930271b0e5a2020-11-25T01:56:41ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament2575-16542019-01-01219711310.1080/25751654.2019.16111871611187Is the NPT Still Relevant? – How to Progress the NPT’s Disarmament ProvisionsJohn Carlson0Asia-Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and DisarmamentThe Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is the cornerstone of the global non-proliferation regime. However, the question is the NPT still relevant? may suggest that the importance of NPT has been forgotten. Indeed, lack of progress in nuclear disarmament has led some critics to question the value of the NPT. While frustration at the failure of the nuclear-weapon states to meet their NPT disarmament obligations is understandable, political attacks on the NPT itself are extremely short-sighted. Non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament are inextricably linked, there will be no disarmament if there is no confidence in non-proliferation, and weakening the non-proliferation regime is in no-one’s interest. The absence of disarmament efforts has prompted the negotiation of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This treaty has reinvigorated discussion on nuclear disarmament, but its impact is uncertain. Disarmament requires a collaborative approach between the nuclear-armed states and the non-nuclear-weapon states. A major diplomatic effort is needed on these issues: all states need to be more aware of the security benefits they derive from the NPT; and the nuclear-armed states must make a serious commitment to reducing the risks of nuclear weapons and pursuing disarmament, not only to meet NPT commitments but because disarmament is in their own interest.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1611187Nuclear weaponsnon-proliferationdisarmamentarms controlsafeguards
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Carlson
spellingShingle John Carlson
Is the NPT Still Relevant? – How to Progress the NPT’s Disarmament Provisions
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Nuclear weapons
non-proliferation
disarmament
arms control
safeguards
author_facet John Carlson
author_sort John Carlson
title Is the NPT Still Relevant? – How to Progress the NPT’s Disarmament Provisions
title_short Is the NPT Still Relevant? – How to Progress the NPT’s Disarmament Provisions
title_full Is the NPT Still Relevant? – How to Progress the NPT’s Disarmament Provisions
title_fullStr Is the NPT Still Relevant? – How to Progress the NPT’s Disarmament Provisions
title_full_unstemmed Is the NPT Still Relevant? – How to Progress the NPT’s Disarmament Provisions
title_sort is the npt still relevant? – how to progress the npt’s disarmament provisions
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
issn 2575-1654
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is the cornerstone of the global non-proliferation regime. However, the question is the NPT still relevant? may suggest that the importance of NPT has been forgotten. Indeed, lack of progress in nuclear disarmament has led some critics to question the value of the NPT. While frustration at the failure of the nuclear-weapon states to meet their NPT disarmament obligations is understandable, political attacks on the NPT itself are extremely short-sighted. Non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament are inextricably linked, there will be no disarmament if there is no confidence in non-proliferation, and weakening the non-proliferation regime is in no-one’s interest. The absence of disarmament efforts has prompted the negotiation of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This treaty has reinvigorated discussion on nuclear disarmament, but its impact is uncertain. Disarmament requires a collaborative approach between the nuclear-armed states and the non-nuclear-weapon states. A major diplomatic effort is needed on these issues: all states need to be more aware of the security benefits they derive from the NPT; and the nuclear-armed states must make a serious commitment to reducing the risks of nuclear weapons and pursuing disarmament, not only to meet NPT commitments but because disarmament is in their own interest.
topic Nuclear weapons
non-proliferation
disarmament
arms control
safeguards
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1611187
work_keys_str_mv AT johncarlson isthenptstillrelevanthowtoprogressthenptsdisarmamentprovisions
_version_ 1724978624298221568