Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.
Our knowledge about affective processes, especially concerning effects on cognitive demands like word processing, is increasing steadily. Several studies consistently document valence and arousal effects, and although there is some debate on possible interactions and different notions of valence, br...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3161062?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-fbf68a767ddf40649aaf094376450886 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fbf68a767ddf40649aaf0943764508862020-11-25T02:05:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0168e2374310.1371/journal.pone.0023743Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.Benny B BriesemeisterLars KuchinkeArthur M JacobsOur knowledge about affective processes, especially concerning effects on cognitive demands like word processing, is increasing steadily. Several studies consistently document valence and arousal effects, and although there is some debate on possible interactions and different notions of valence, broad agreement on a two dimensional model of affective space has been achieved. Alternative models like the discrete emotion theory have received little interest in word recognition research so far. Using backward elimination and multiple regression analyses, we show that five discrete emotions (i.e., happiness, disgust, fear, anger and sadness) explain as much variance as two published dimensional models assuming continuous or categorical valence, with the variables happiness, disgust and fear significantly contributing to this account. Moreover, these effects even persist in an experiment with discrete emotion conditions when the stimuli are controlled for emotional valence and arousal levels. We interpret this result as evidence for discrete emotion effects in visual word recognition that cannot be explained by the two dimensional affective space account.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3161062?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Benny B Briesemeister Lars Kuchinke Arthur M Jacobs |
spellingShingle |
Benny B Briesemeister Lars Kuchinke Arthur M Jacobs Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Benny B Briesemeister Lars Kuchinke Arthur M Jacobs |
author_sort |
Benny B Briesemeister |
title |
Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. |
title_short |
Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. |
title_full |
Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. |
title_fullStr |
Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. |
title_sort |
discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
Our knowledge about affective processes, especially concerning effects on cognitive demands like word processing, is increasing steadily. Several studies consistently document valence and arousal effects, and although there is some debate on possible interactions and different notions of valence, broad agreement on a two dimensional model of affective space has been achieved. Alternative models like the discrete emotion theory have received little interest in word recognition research so far. Using backward elimination and multiple regression analyses, we show that five discrete emotions (i.e., happiness, disgust, fear, anger and sadness) explain as much variance as two published dimensional models assuming continuous or categorical valence, with the variables happiness, disgust and fear significantly contributing to this account. Moreover, these effects even persist in an experiment with discrete emotion conditions when the stimuli are controlled for emotional valence and arousal levels. We interpret this result as evidence for discrete emotion effects in visual word recognition that cannot be explained by the two dimensional affective space account. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3161062?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bennybbriesemeister discreteemotioneffectsonlexicaldecisionresponsetimes AT larskuchinke discreteemotioneffectsonlexicaldecisionresponsetimes AT arthurmjacobs discreteemotioneffectsonlexicaldecisionresponsetimes |
_version_ |
1724938943742345216 |