Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.

Our knowledge about affective processes, especially concerning effects on cognitive demands like word processing, is increasing steadily. Several studies consistently document valence and arousal effects, and although there is some debate on possible interactions and different notions of valence, br...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benny B Briesemeister, Lars Kuchinke, Arthur M Jacobs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3161062?pdf=render
id doaj-fbf68a767ddf40649aaf094376450886
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fbf68a767ddf40649aaf0943764508862020-11-25T02:05:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0168e2374310.1371/journal.pone.0023743Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.Benny B BriesemeisterLars KuchinkeArthur M JacobsOur knowledge about affective processes, especially concerning effects on cognitive demands like word processing, is increasing steadily. Several studies consistently document valence and arousal effects, and although there is some debate on possible interactions and different notions of valence, broad agreement on a two dimensional model of affective space has been achieved. Alternative models like the discrete emotion theory have received little interest in word recognition research so far. Using backward elimination and multiple regression analyses, we show that five discrete emotions (i.e., happiness, disgust, fear, anger and sadness) explain as much variance as two published dimensional models assuming continuous or categorical valence, with the variables happiness, disgust and fear significantly contributing to this account. Moreover, these effects even persist in an experiment with discrete emotion conditions when the stimuli are controlled for emotional valence and arousal levels. We interpret this result as evidence for discrete emotion effects in visual word recognition that cannot be explained by the two dimensional affective space account.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3161062?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benny B Briesemeister
Lars Kuchinke
Arthur M Jacobs
spellingShingle Benny B Briesemeister
Lars Kuchinke
Arthur M Jacobs
Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Benny B Briesemeister
Lars Kuchinke
Arthur M Jacobs
author_sort Benny B Briesemeister
title Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.
title_short Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.
title_full Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.
title_fullStr Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.
title_full_unstemmed Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.
title_sort discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Our knowledge about affective processes, especially concerning effects on cognitive demands like word processing, is increasing steadily. Several studies consistently document valence and arousal effects, and although there is some debate on possible interactions and different notions of valence, broad agreement on a two dimensional model of affective space has been achieved. Alternative models like the discrete emotion theory have received little interest in word recognition research so far. Using backward elimination and multiple regression analyses, we show that five discrete emotions (i.e., happiness, disgust, fear, anger and sadness) explain as much variance as two published dimensional models assuming continuous or categorical valence, with the variables happiness, disgust and fear significantly contributing to this account. Moreover, these effects even persist in an experiment with discrete emotion conditions when the stimuli are controlled for emotional valence and arousal levels. We interpret this result as evidence for discrete emotion effects in visual word recognition that cannot be explained by the two dimensional affective space account.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3161062?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT bennybbriesemeister discreteemotioneffectsonlexicaldecisionresponsetimes
AT larskuchinke discreteemotioneffectsonlexicaldecisionresponsetimes
AT arthurmjacobs discreteemotioneffectsonlexicaldecisionresponsetimes
_version_ 1724938943742345216