Changes in Spruce Growth and Biomass Allocation Following Thinning and Guying Treatments

When forest stands are thinned, the retained trees are exposed to increased light and greater mechanical strain from the wind. The consequent greater availability of photosynthate and localised mechanical strain in stems and roots are both known to increase cambial growth in conifers, but their rela...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruce C. Nicoll, Thomas Connolly, Barry A. Gardiner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/3/253
id doaj-fbf3ef97e5884fa49821492c70178c75
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fbf3ef97e5884fa49821492c70178c752020-11-25T00:13:21ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072019-03-0110325310.3390/f10030253f10030253Changes in Spruce Growth and Biomass Allocation Following Thinning and Guying TreatmentsBruce C. Nicoll0Thomas Connolly1Barry A. Gardiner2Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland EH25 9SY, UKForest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland EH25 9SY, UKForest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland EH25 9SY, UKWhen forest stands are thinned, the retained trees are exposed to increased light and greater mechanical strain from the wind. The consequent greater availability of photosynthate and localised mechanical strain in stems and roots are both known to increase cambial growth in conifers, but their relative importance has not previously been quantified. Light availability and wind movement were manipulated in a 10-year-old stand of Sitka spruce trees on an exposed upland site. Treatments were “Control”—no change in spacing or wind loading; “Thinned”—light availability and wind loading increased by removing neighbouring trees; “Thinned and guyed”—light increased and wind loading reduced by removing neighbouring trees and guying stems with wires. Twelve trees per treatment were maintained and monitored for four years before harvesting and removal of cross-sectional stem samples from four heights for measurement of radial growth response. Root systems were excavated from each treatment for observations of associated root growth responses. The “Thinned” treatment and “Thinned and guyed” treatment showed no significant stem growth response in the first year after treatment, but very large increases in the second and subsequent years. There were much larger growth responses in the “Thinned” treatment than in the “Thinned and guyed” treatment, especially in the lower stem. Similar growth responses were observed in the structural roots, close to the stem base. These increases in stem and root growth in response to wind movement corresponded with a reduction of branch growth. Such changes in allocation have implications for the hydraulic and biomechanical requirements of trees, and should be incorporated into tree growth and stability models.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/3/253light availabilitywindmechanical strainallocationbiomechanical acclimation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bruce C. Nicoll
Thomas Connolly
Barry A. Gardiner
spellingShingle Bruce C. Nicoll
Thomas Connolly
Barry A. Gardiner
Changes in Spruce Growth and Biomass Allocation Following Thinning and Guying Treatments
Forests
light availability
wind
mechanical strain
allocation
biomechanical acclimation
author_facet Bruce C. Nicoll
Thomas Connolly
Barry A. Gardiner
author_sort Bruce C. Nicoll
title Changes in Spruce Growth and Biomass Allocation Following Thinning and Guying Treatments
title_short Changes in Spruce Growth and Biomass Allocation Following Thinning and Guying Treatments
title_full Changes in Spruce Growth and Biomass Allocation Following Thinning and Guying Treatments
title_fullStr Changes in Spruce Growth and Biomass Allocation Following Thinning and Guying Treatments
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Spruce Growth and Biomass Allocation Following Thinning and Guying Treatments
title_sort changes in spruce growth and biomass allocation following thinning and guying treatments
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2019-03-01
description When forest stands are thinned, the retained trees are exposed to increased light and greater mechanical strain from the wind. The consequent greater availability of photosynthate and localised mechanical strain in stems and roots are both known to increase cambial growth in conifers, but their relative importance has not previously been quantified. Light availability and wind movement were manipulated in a 10-year-old stand of Sitka spruce trees on an exposed upland site. Treatments were “Control”—no change in spacing or wind loading; “Thinned”—light availability and wind loading increased by removing neighbouring trees; “Thinned and guyed”—light increased and wind loading reduced by removing neighbouring trees and guying stems with wires. Twelve trees per treatment were maintained and monitored for four years before harvesting and removal of cross-sectional stem samples from four heights for measurement of radial growth response. Root systems were excavated from each treatment for observations of associated root growth responses. The “Thinned” treatment and “Thinned and guyed” treatment showed no significant stem growth response in the first year after treatment, but very large increases in the second and subsequent years. There were much larger growth responses in the “Thinned” treatment than in the “Thinned and guyed” treatment, especially in the lower stem. Similar growth responses were observed in the structural roots, close to the stem base. These increases in stem and root growth in response to wind movement corresponded with a reduction of branch growth. Such changes in allocation have implications for the hydraulic and biomechanical requirements of trees, and should be incorporated into tree growth and stability models.
topic light availability
wind
mechanical strain
allocation
biomechanical acclimation
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/10/3/253
work_keys_str_mv AT brucecnicoll changesinsprucegrowthandbiomassallocationfollowingthinningandguyingtreatments
AT thomasconnolly changesinsprucegrowthandbiomassallocationfollowingthinningandguyingtreatments
AT barryagardiner changesinsprucegrowthandbiomassallocationfollowingthinningandguyingtreatments
_version_ 1725394775215964160