Cost-effectiveness of post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary prevention of tuberculosis in a high-incidence setting: a model-based analysis

Summary: Background: In settings of high tuberculosis incidence, previously treated individuals remain at high risk of recurrent tuberculosis and contribute substantially to overall disease burden. Whether tuberculosis case finding and preventive interventions among previously treated people are co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florian M Marx, MD, Ted Cohen, MD, Nicolas A Menzies, PhD, Joshua A Salomon, PhD, Grant Theron, PhD, Reza Yaesoubi, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-09-01
Series:The Lancet Global Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X20302278
id doaj-fbd22ba70e194bedb9edbe2aafa22382
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Florian M Marx, MD
Ted Cohen, MD
Nicolas A Menzies, PhD
Joshua A Salomon, PhD
Grant Theron, PhD
Reza Yaesoubi, PhD
spellingShingle Florian M Marx, MD
Ted Cohen, MD
Nicolas A Menzies, PhD
Joshua A Salomon, PhD
Grant Theron, PhD
Reza Yaesoubi, PhD
Cost-effectiveness of post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary prevention of tuberculosis in a high-incidence setting: a model-based analysis
The Lancet Global Health
author_facet Florian M Marx, MD
Ted Cohen, MD
Nicolas A Menzies, PhD
Joshua A Salomon, PhD
Grant Theron, PhD
Reza Yaesoubi, PhD
author_sort Florian M Marx, MD
title Cost-effectiveness of post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary prevention of tuberculosis in a high-incidence setting: a model-based analysis
title_short Cost-effectiveness of post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary prevention of tuberculosis in a high-incidence setting: a model-based analysis
title_full Cost-effectiveness of post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary prevention of tuberculosis in a high-incidence setting: a model-based analysis
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary prevention of tuberculosis in a high-incidence setting: a model-based analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary prevention of tuberculosis in a high-incidence setting: a model-based analysis
title_sort cost-effectiveness of post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary prevention of tuberculosis in a high-incidence setting: a model-based analysis
publisher Elsevier
series The Lancet Global Health
issn 2214-109X
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Summary: Background: In settings of high tuberculosis incidence, previously treated individuals remain at high risk of recurrent tuberculosis and contribute substantially to overall disease burden. Whether tuberculosis case finding and preventive interventions among previously treated people are cost-effective has not been established. We aimed to estimate costs and health benefits of annual post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary preventive therapy for tuberculosis in a tuberculosis-endemic setting. Methods: We developed a transmission-dynamic mathematical model and calibrated it to data from two high-incidence communities of approximately 40 000 people in suburban Cape Town, South Africa. We used the model to estimate overall cost and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) associated with annual follow-up examinations and secondary isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT), alone and in combination, among individuals completing tuberculosis treatment. We investigated scenarios under which these interventions were restricted to the first year after treatment completion, or extended indefinitely. For each intervention scenario, we projected health system costs and DALYs averted with respect to the current status quo of tuberculosis control. All estimates represent mean values derived from 1000 epidemic trajectories simulated over a 10-year period (2019–28), with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) calculated as the 2·5th and 97·5th percentile values. Findings: We estimated that a single follow-up examination at the end of the first year after treatment completion combined with 12 months of secondary IPT would avert 2472 DALYs (95% UI −888 to 7801) over a 10-year period and is expected to be cost-saving compared with current control efforts. Sustained annual follow-up and continuous secondary IPT beyond the first year after treatment would avert an additional 1179 DALYs (−1769 to 4377) over 10 years at an expected additional cost of US$18·2 per DALY averted. Strategies of follow-up without secondary IPT were dominated (ie, expected to result in lower health impact at higher costs) by strategies that included secondary IPT. Interpretation: In this high-incidence setting, post-treatment follow-up and secondary preventive therapy can accelerate declines in tuberculosis incidence and potentially save resources for tuberculosis control. Empirical trials to assess the feasibility of these interventions in settings most severely affected by tuberculosis are needed. Funding: National Institutes of Health, Günther Labes Foundation, Oskar Helene Heim Foundation.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X20302278
work_keys_str_mv AT florianmmarxmd costeffectivenessofposttreatmentfollowupexaminationsandsecondarypreventionoftuberculosisinahighincidencesettingamodelbasedanalysis
AT tedcohenmd costeffectivenessofposttreatmentfollowupexaminationsandsecondarypreventionoftuberculosisinahighincidencesettingamodelbasedanalysis
AT nicolasamenziesphd costeffectivenessofposttreatmentfollowupexaminationsandsecondarypreventionoftuberculosisinahighincidencesettingamodelbasedanalysis
AT joshuaasalomonphd costeffectivenessofposttreatmentfollowupexaminationsandsecondarypreventionoftuberculosisinahighincidencesettingamodelbasedanalysis
AT granttheronphd costeffectivenessofposttreatmentfollowupexaminationsandsecondarypreventionoftuberculosisinahighincidencesettingamodelbasedanalysis
AT rezayaesoubiphd costeffectivenessofposttreatmentfollowupexaminationsandsecondarypreventionoftuberculosisinahighincidencesettingamodelbasedanalysis
_version_ 1724466334831476736
spelling doaj-fbd22ba70e194bedb9edbe2aafa223822020-11-25T03:56:13ZengElsevierThe Lancet Global Health2214-109X2020-09-0189e1223e1233Cost-effectiveness of post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary prevention of tuberculosis in a high-incidence setting: a model-based analysisFlorian M Marx, MD0Ted Cohen, MD1Nicolas A Menzies, PhD2Joshua A Salomon, PhD3Grant Theron, PhD4Reza Yaesoubi, PhD5DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; Correspondence to: Dr Florian M Marx, DSI-NRF South African Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South AfricaDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USADepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USADepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USADSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South AfricaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USASummary: Background: In settings of high tuberculosis incidence, previously treated individuals remain at high risk of recurrent tuberculosis and contribute substantially to overall disease burden. Whether tuberculosis case finding and preventive interventions among previously treated people are cost-effective has not been established. We aimed to estimate costs and health benefits of annual post-treatment follow-up examinations and secondary preventive therapy for tuberculosis in a tuberculosis-endemic setting. Methods: We developed a transmission-dynamic mathematical model and calibrated it to data from two high-incidence communities of approximately 40 000 people in suburban Cape Town, South Africa. We used the model to estimate overall cost and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) associated with annual follow-up examinations and secondary isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT), alone and in combination, among individuals completing tuberculosis treatment. We investigated scenarios under which these interventions were restricted to the first year after treatment completion, or extended indefinitely. For each intervention scenario, we projected health system costs and DALYs averted with respect to the current status quo of tuberculosis control. All estimates represent mean values derived from 1000 epidemic trajectories simulated over a 10-year period (2019–28), with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) calculated as the 2·5th and 97·5th percentile values. Findings: We estimated that a single follow-up examination at the end of the first year after treatment completion combined with 12 months of secondary IPT would avert 2472 DALYs (95% UI −888 to 7801) over a 10-year period and is expected to be cost-saving compared with current control efforts. Sustained annual follow-up and continuous secondary IPT beyond the first year after treatment would avert an additional 1179 DALYs (−1769 to 4377) over 10 years at an expected additional cost of US$18·2 per DALY averted. Strategies of follow-up without secondary IPT were dominated (ie, expected to result in lower health impact at higher costs) by strategies that included secondary IPT. Interpretation: In this high-incidence setting, post-treatment follow-up and secondary preventive therapy can accelerate declines in tuberculosis incidence and potentially save resources for tuberculosis control. Empirical trials to assess the feasibility of these interventions in settings most severely affected by tuberculosis are needed. Funding: National Institutes of Health, Günther Labes Foundation, Oskar Helene Heim Foundation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X20302278