Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures
ICNIRP and IEEE publish standards/guidelines for exposures to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and their associated in situ electric fields. Two methods are prescribed for spatially averaging the in situ electric field to evaluate compliance: averaging (1) over a 2 mm × 2 mm �...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2019-01-01
|
Series: | IEEE Access |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8936363/ |
id |
doaj-fbc244699dff4d749e6384ddc43c59cc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fbc244699dff4d749e6384ddc43c59cc2021-03-30T00:29:19ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362019-01-01718432018433110.1109/ACCESS.2019.29603948936363Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field ExposuresYinliang Diao0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-4515Jose Gomez-Tames1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-8979Essam A. Rashed2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6571-9807Robert Kavet3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5091-5776Akimasa Hirata4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-1140Department of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, JapanKavet Consulting LLC, Oakland, CA, USADepartment of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, JapanICNIRP and IEEE publish standards/guidelines for exposures to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and their associated in situ electric fields. Two methods are prescribed for spatially averaging the in situ electric field to evaluate compliance: averaging (1) over a 2 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm volume (ICNIRP) and (2) along a 5 mm linear segment of neural tissue (IEEE). However, detailed calculation procedures for these two schemes are not provided, particularly when the averaging volume/line straddles a tissue/air or tissue/tissue interface. This study proposes detailed schemes for implementing the volume- and line-averaging in such cases, applying them to both a spherical model of layered tissues and a human anatomical model. To extend the applicability of the proposed averaging schemes to the voxels at the tissue boundaries, a parameter, p<sub>max</sub>, is introduced and defined as the maximum permissible percentage of air/other tissues in the averaging volume/line. For most inner-tissue voxels results show good agreement between the two averaging schemes, in general. Excluding skin, the relative differences between the two averaging schemes were less than 9% for the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile in situ electric field, and these differences decrease as p<sub>max</sub> increases. Results indicate that around 20-30% inclusion of air or other tissues for volume averaging of internal tissues provides stable percentile values; less stability is observed across p<sub>max</sub> for linear averaging. Invoking the suggestion of ICNIRP (2010) that the averaging cube for skin “may extend to subcutaneous tissue,” ≥10% inclusion of air results in stable averaged induced electric fields.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8936363/Human safetydosimetrystandardizationlow frequencyspatial averaging |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yinliang Diao Jose Gomez-Tames Essam A. Rashed Robert Kavet Akimasa Hirata |
spellingShingle |
Yinliang Diao Jose Gomez-Tames Essam A. Rashed Robert Kavet Akimasa Hirata Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures IEEE Access Human safety dosimetry standardization low frequency spatial averaging |
author_facet |
Yinliang Diao Jose Gomez-Tames Essam A. Rashed Robert Kavet Akimasa Hirata |
author_sort |
Yinliang Diao |
title |
Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures |
title_short |
Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures |
title_full |
Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures |
title_fullStr |
Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures |
title_sort |
spatial averaging schemes of <italic>in situ</italic> electric field for low-frequency magnetic field exposures |
publisher |
IEEE |
series |
IEEE Access |
issn |
2169-3536 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
ICNIRP and IEEE publish standards/guidelines for exposures to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and their associated in situ electric fields. Two methods are prescribed for spatially averaging the in situ electric field to evaluate compliance: averaging (1) over a 2 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm volume (ICNIRP) and (2) along a 5 mm linear segment of neural tissue (IEEE). However, detailed calculation procedures for these two schemes are not provided, particularly when the averaging volume/line straddles a tissue/air or tissue/tissue interface. This study proposes detailed schemes for implementing the volume- and line-averaging in such cases, applying them to both a spherical model of layered tissues and a human anatomical model. To extend the applicability of the proposed averaging schemes to the voxels at the tissue boundaries, a parameter, p<sub>max</sub>, is introduced and defined as the maximum permissible percentage of air/other tissues in the averaging volume/line. For most inner-tissue voxels results show good agreement between the two averaging schemes, in general. Excluding skin, the relative differences between the two averaging schemes were less than 9% for the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile in situ electric field, and these differences decrease as p<sub>max</sub> increases. Results indicate that around 20-30% inclusion of air or other tissues for volume averaging of internal tissues provides stable percentile values; less stability is observed across p<sub>max</sub> for linear averaging. Invoking the suggestion of ICNIRP (2010) that the averaging cube for skin “may extend to subcutaneous tissue,” ≥10% inclusion of air results in stable averaged induced electric fields. |
topic |
Human safety dosimetry standardization low frequency spatial averaging |
url |
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8936363/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yinliangdiao spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures AT josegomeztames spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures AT essamarashed spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures AT robertkavet spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures AT akimasahirata spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures |
_version_ |
1724188259575136256 |