Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures

ICNIRP and IEEE publish standards/guidelines for exposures to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and their associated in situ electric fields. Two methods are prescribed for spatially averaging the in situ electric field to evaluate compliance: averaging (1) over a 2 mm &#x00D7; 2 mm &#x00...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yinliang Diao, Jose Gomez-Tames, Essam A. Rashed, Robert Kavet, Akimasa Hirata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2019-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8936363/
id doaj-fbc244699dff4d749e6384ddc43c59cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fbc244699dff4d749e6384ddc43c59cc2021-03-30T00:29:19ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362019-01-01718432018433110.1109/ACCESS.2019.29603948936363Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field ExposuresYinliang Diao0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-4515Jose Gomez-Tames1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-8979Essam A. Rashed2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6571-9807Robert Kavet3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5091-5776Akimasa Hirata4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-1140Department of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, JapanKavet Consulting LLC, Oakland, CA, USADepartment of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, JapanICNIRP and IEEE publish standards/guidelines for exposures to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and their associated in situ electric fields. Two methods are prescribed for spatially averaging the in situ electric field to evaluate compliance: averaging (1) over a 2 mm &#x00D7; 2 mm &#x00D7; 2 mm volume (ICNIRP) and (2) along a 5 mm linear segment of neural tissue (IEEE). However, detailed calculation procedures for these two schemes are not provided, particularly when the averaging volume/line straddles a tissue/air or tissue/tissue interface. This study proposes detailed schemes for implementing the volume- and line-averaging in such cases, applying them to both a spherical model of layered tissues and a human anatomical model. To extend the applicability of the proposed averaging schemes to the voxels at the tissue boundaries, a parameter, p<sub>max</sub>, is introduced and defined as the maximum permissible percentage of air/other tissues in the averaging volume/line. For most inner-tissue voxels results show good agreement between the two averaging schemes, in general. Excluding skin, the relative differences between the two averaging schemes were less than 9% for the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile in situ electric field, and these differences decrease as p<sub>max</sub> increases. Results indicate that around 20-30% inclusion of air or other tissues for volume averaging of internal tissues provides stable percentile values; less stability is observed across p<sub>max</sub> for linear averaging. Invoking the suggestion of ICNIRP (2010) that the averaging cube for skin &#x201C;may extend to subcutaneous tissue,&#x201D; &#x2265;10% inclusion of air results in stable averaged induced electric fields.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8936363/Human safetydosimetrystandardizationlow frequencyspatial averaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yinliang Diao
Jose Gomez-Tames
Essam A. Rashed
Robert Kavet
Akimasa Hirata
spellingShingle Yinliang Diao
Jose Gomez-Tames
Essam A. Rashed
Robert Kavet
Akimasa Hirata
Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures
IEEE Access
Human safety
dosimetry
standardization
low frequency
spatial averaging
author_facet Yinliang Diao
Jose Gomez-Tames
Essam A. Rashed
Robert Kavet
Akimasa Hirata
author_sort Yinliang Diao
title Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures
title_short Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures
title_full Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures
title_fullStr Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Averaging Schemes of <italic>In Situ</italic> Electric Field for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposures
title_sort spatial averaging schemes of <italic>in situ</italic> electric field for low-frequency magnetic field exposures
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2019-01-01
description ICNIRP and IEEE publish standards/guidelines for exposures to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and their associated in situ electric fields. Two methods are prescribed for spatially averaging the in situ electric field to evaluate compliance: averaging (1) over a 2 mm &#x00D7; 2 mm &#x00D7; 2 mm volume (ICNIRP) and (2) along a 5 mm linear segment of neural tissue (IEEE). However, detailed calculation procedures for these two schemes are not provided, particularly when the averaging volume/line straddles a tissue/air or tissue/tissue interface. This study proposes detailed schemes for implementing the volume- and line-averaging in such cases, applying them to both a spherical model of layered tissues and a human anatomical model. To extend the applicability of the proposed averaging schemes to the voxels at the tissue boundaries, a parameter, p<sub>max</sub>, is introduced and defined as the maximum permissible percentage of air/other tissues in the averaging volume/line. For most inner-tissue voxels results show good agreement between the two averaging schemes, in general. Excluding skin, the relative differences between the two averaging schemes were less than 9% for the 99<sup>th</sup> percentile in situ electric field, and these differences decrease as p<sub>max</sub> increases. Results indicate that around 20-30% inclusion of air or other tissues for volume averaging of internal tissues provides stable percentile values; less stability is observed across p<sub>max</sub> for linear averaging. Invoking the suggestion of ICNIRP (2010) that the averaging cube for skin &#x201C;may extend to subcutaneous tissue,&#x201D; &#x2265;10% inclusion of air results in stable averaged induced electric fields.
topic Human safety
dosimetry
standardization
low frequency
spatial averaging
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8936363/
work_keys_str_mv AT yinliangdiao spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures
AT josegomeztames spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures
AT essamarashed spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures
AT robertkavet spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures
AT akimasahirata spatialaveragingschemesofitalicinsituitalicelectricfieldforlowfrequencymagneticfieldexposures
_version_ 1724188259575136256