'Legality' of the legal order in postwar Serbia from 1944 to 1946: Organization and work of the judiciary

The judiciary in Serbia is heir to a long tradition of political influence, which was particularly visible during the Communist regime after World War II. Violations of the presumption of innocence, retroactive sentencing and a denial of basic human rights are just some of the features of the work o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dabetić Valerija
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia 2020-01-01
Series:Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2020/0003-25652004158D.pdf
id doaj-fbc1a0cc000048dab9d8ef159563145f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fbc1a0cc000048dab9d8ef159563145f2021-03-22T11:00:17ZengUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, SerbiaAnali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu0003-25652406-26932020-01-0168415818310.51204/Anali_PFUB_20408A0003-25652004158D'Legality' of the legal order in postwar Serbia from 1944 to 1946: Organization and work of the judiciaryDabetić Valerija0University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, SerbiaThe judiciary in Serbia is heir to a long tradition of political influence, which was particularly visible during the Communist regime after World War II. Violations of the presumption of innocence, retroactive sentencing and a denial of basic human rights are just some of the features of the work of the postwar "judiciary" in Serbia, between 1944 and 1946. This paper analyzes the implications of revolutionary legislative activity, the structure and organization of the Military Court and the Court of Honor, and examines to what extent the dominant political culture, implemented through the state coercive apparatus, influenced judicial adjudication. The paper elaborates on Radbruch's idea of "statutory lawlessness", Fuller's notion of "procedural natural law" and "internal morality of law" and argues that the postwar law of Communist Serbia did not exercise formal and procedural justice, and cannot be called a legal system in the full sense of the word.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2020/0003-25652004158D.pdfcommunist serbiaformal and procedural justice"internal morality of law"military courtscourt of honor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dabetić Valerija
spellingShingle Dabetić Valerija
'Legality' of the legal order in postwar Serbia from 1944 to 1946: Organization and work of the judiciary
Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu
communist serbia
formal and procedural justice
"internal morality of law"
military courts
court of honor
author_facet Dabetić Valerija
author_sort Dabetić Valerija
title 'Legality' of the legal order in postwar Serbia from 1944 to 1946: Organization and work of the judiciary
title_short 'Legality' of the legal order in postwar Serbia from 1944 to 1946: Organization and work of the judiciary
title_full 'Legality' of the legal order in postwar Serbia from 1944 to 1946: Organization and work of the judiciary
title_fullStr 'Legality' of the legal order in postwar Serbia from 1944 to 1946: Organization and work of the judiciary
title_full_unstemmed 'Legality' of the legal order in postwar Serbia from 1944 to 1946: Organization and work of the judiciary
title_sort 'legality' of the legal order in postwar serbia from 1944 to 1946: organization and work of the judiciary
publisher University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia
series Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu
issn 0003-2565
2406-2693
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The judiciary in Serbia is heir to a long tradition of political influence, which was particularly visible during the Communist regime after World War II. Violations of the presumption of innocence, retroactive sentencing and a denial of basic human rights are just some of the features of the work of the postwar "judiciary" in Serbia, between 1944 and 1946. This paper analyzes the implications of revolutionary legislative activity, the structure and organization of the Military Court and the Court of Honor, and examines to what extent the dominant political culture, implemented through the state coercive apparatus, influenced judicial adjudication. The paper elaborates on Radbruch's idea of "statutory lawlessness", Fuller's notion of "procedural natural law" and "internal morality of law" and argues that the postwar law of Communist Serbia did not exercise formal and procedural justice, and cannot be called a legal system in the full sense of the word.
topic communist serbia
formal and procedural justice
"internal morality of law"
military courts
court of honor
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2020/0003-25652004158D.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dabeticvalerija legalityofthelegalorderinpostwarserbiafrom1944to1946organizationandworkofthejudiciary
_version_ 1724208870953320448