Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up

Background and purpose — Elderly patients may benefit from a dislocation low-risk dual-mobility (DM) articulation in total hip arthroplasty, but the best cup fixation method is unknown. We compared cup migration for cemented and cementless DM cups using radiostereometry. Patients and methods — In a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steffan Tabori-Jensen, Sebastian Breddam Mosegaard, Torben B Hansen, Maiken Stilling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-05-01
Series:Acta Orthopaedica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1720978
id doaj-fbbccd9332174b10ad3e8803d2fe324b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fbbccd9332174b10ad3e8803d2fe324b2021-04-02T11:40:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Orthopaedica1745-36741745-36822020-05-0191324625310.1080/17453674.2020.17209781720978Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-upSteffan Tabori-Jensen0Sebastian Breddam Mosegaard1Torben B Hansen2Maiken Stilling3University Clinic for HandUniversity Clinic for HandUniversity Clinic for HandUniversity Clinic for HandBackground and purpose — Elderly patients may benefit from a dislocation low-risk dual-mobility (DM) articulation in total hip arthroplasty, but the best cup fixation method is unknown. We compared cup migration for cemented and cementless DM cups using radiostereometry. Patients and methods — In a patient-blinded randomized trial, 60 patients (33 female) with osteoarthritis were allocated to cemented (n = 30) or cementless (n = 30) Avantage DM cup fixation. Criteria were age above 70 years, and T-score above –4. We investigated cup migration, periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) until 24 months postoperative follow-up. Results — At 24 months mean proximal cup migration was 0.11 mm (95% CI 0.00–0.23) for cemented cups and 0.09 mm (CI –0.09 to 0.28) for cementless cups. However, cementless cups generally migrated more than cemented cups at 12 and 24 months. Cemented cups had no measurable migration from 3 months’ follow-up, while cementless cups had not yet stabilized at 24 months in all rotations. Cementless cups showed statistically significantly more maximum total point motion (MTPM) at 12- and 24-month follow-up compared with cemented cups in patients with low systemic BMD (p = 0.01). Periprosthetic BMD changes did not statisticially significantly correlate to proximal migration in either cup fixation group (p > 0.05). PROMs improved similarly in both groups. Interpretation — Cemented cups were well fixed at 3 months. The cementless cups migrated more in patients with low BMD, showed an inconsistent pattern of migration, and migrated in different directions during the first and second year without tendency to stabilization. Cemented fixation of the Avantage DM cup seems safer in elderly patientshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1720978
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steffan Tabori-Jensen
Sebastian Breddam Mosegaard
Torben B Hansen
Maiken Stilling
spellingShingle Steffan Tabori-Jensen
Sebastian Breddam Mosegaard
Torben B Hansen
Maiken Stilling
Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up
Acta Orthopaedica
author_facet Steffan Tabori-Jensen
Sebastian Breddam Mosegaard
Torben B Hansen
Maiken Stilling
author_sort Steffan Tabori-Jensen
title Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up
title_short Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up
title_full Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up
title_fullStr Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up
title_sort inferior stabilization of cementless compared with cemented dual-mobility cups in elderly osteoarthrosis patients: a randomized controlled radiostereometry study on 60 patients with 2 years’ follow-up
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Acta Orthopaedica
issn 1745-3674
1745-3682
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Background and purpose — Elderly patients may benefit from a dislocation low-risk dual-mobility (DM) articulation in total hip arthroplasty, but the best cup fixation method is unknown. We compared cup migration for cemented and cementless DM cups using radiostereometry. Patients and methods — In a patient-blinded randomized trial, 60 patients (33 female) with osteoarthritis were allocated to cemented (n = 30) or cementless (n = 30) Avantage DM cup fixation. Criteria were age above 70 years, and T-score above –4. We investigated cup migration, periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) until 24 months postoperative follow-up. Results — At 24 months mean proximal cup migration was 0.11 mm (95% CI 0.00–0.23) for cemented cups and 0.09 mm (CI –0.09 to 0.28) for cementless cups. However, cementless cups generally migrated more than cemented cups at 12 and 24 months. Cemented cups had no measurable migration from 3 months’ follow-up, while cementless cups had not yet stabilized at 24 months in all rotations. Cementless cups showed statistically significantly more maximum total point motion (MTPM) at 12- and 24-month follow-up compared with cemented cups in patients with low systemic BMD (p = 0.01). Periprosthetic BMD changes did not statisticially significantly correlate to proximal migration in either cup fixation group (p > 0.05). PROMs improved similarly in both groups. Interpretation — Cemented cups were well fixed at 3 months. The cementless cups migrated more in patients with low BMD, showed an inconsistent pattern of migration, and migrated in different directions during the first and second year without tendency to stabilization. Cemented fixation of the Avantage DM cup seems safer in elderly patients
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1720978
work_keys_str_mv AT steffantaborijensen inferiorstabilizationofcementlesscomparedwithcementeddualmobilitycupsinelderlyosteoarthrosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledradiostereometrystudyon60patientswith2yearsfollowup
AT sebastianbreddammosegaard inferiorstabilizationofcementlesscomparedwithcementeddualmobilitycupsinelderlyosteoarthrosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledradiostereometrystudyon60patientswith2yearsfollowup
AT torbenbhansen inferiorstabilizationofcementlesscomparedwithcementeddualmobilitycupsinelderlyosteoarthrosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledradiostereometrystudyon60patientswith2yearsfollowup
AT maikenstilling inferiorstabilizationofcementlesscomparedwithcementeddualmobilitycupsinelderlyosteoarthrosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledradiostereometrystudyon60patientswith2yearsfollowup
_version_ 1721571770833567744