Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support
The article is devoted to measuring solvable demand of population for energy supply services and the level of budgetary guardianship in Khabarovsk Krai. The authors show the differentiation in availability of energy supply services for consumers, explained by the geographical contrasts and existing...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2019-01-01
|
Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197701007 |
id |
doaj-fbb64f0d28f04d45bf6ba3b5bb892a7e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fbb64f0d28f04d45bf6ba3b5bb892a7e2021-02-02T00:59:10ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422019-01-01770100710.1051/e3sconf/20197701007e3sconf_repar18_01007Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary supportDyomina OlgaNaiden SvetlanaThe article is devoted to measuring solvable demand of population for energy supply services and the level of budgetary guardianship in Khabarovsk Krai. The authors show the differentiation in availability of energy supply services for consumers, explained by the geographical contrasts and existing system of settlement. There are two sources of energy supply in Krai: “Far Eastern Generating Company” (AO “DGK”) and objects of public energetics. The population pays for only a part of actual producers’ costs for energy supply services; the remaining part is compensated by the state through budgetary means. There are two ways to compensate high tariffs on energy supply for population: subsidies and privileges for consumers and subsidies for producers. The population that gets its energy from AO “DGK” pays for energy supply services almost entirely, while population that uses the services of public energetics pays only partially, with the state taking the burden upon itself to compensate the producers’ costs. In case of transitioning to full compensation, the scale of social budgetary support will increase significantly, which contradicts the logic of institutional transformation, aimed at lowering the financial burden of the state.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197701007 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dyomina Olga Naiden Svetlana |
spellingShingle |
Dyomina Olga Naiden Svetlana Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support E3S Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Dyomina Olga Naiden Svetlana |
author_sort |
Dyomina Olga |
title |
Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support |
title_short |
Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support |
title_full |
Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support |
title_fullStr |
Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support |
title_full_unstemmed |
Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support |
title_sort |
energy supply in the khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
E3S Web of Conferences |
issn |
2267-1242 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
The article is devoted to measuring solvable demand of population for energy supply services and the level of budgetary guardianship in Khabarovsk Krai. The authors show the differentiation in availability of energy supply services for consumers, explained by the geographical contrasts and existing system of settlement. There are two sources of energy supply in Krai: “Far Eastern Generating Company” (AO “DGK”) and objects of public energetics. The population pays for only a part of actual producers’ costs for energy supply services; the remaining part is compensated by the state through budgetary means. There are two ways to compensate high tariffs on energy supply for population: subsidies and privileges for consumers and subsidies for producers. The population that gets its energy from AO “DGK” pays for energy supply services almost entirely, while population that uses the services of public energetics pays only partially, with the state taking the burden upon itself to compensate the producers’ costs. In case of transitioning to full compensation, the scale of social budgetary support will increase significantly, which contradicts the logic of institutional transformation, aimed at lowering the financial burden of the state. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197701007 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dyominaolga energysupplyinthekhabarovskterritoryintraregionaldifferentiationandproblemsofbudgetarysupport AT naidensvetlana energysupplyinthekhabarovskterritoryintraregionaldifferentiationandproblemsofbudgetarysupport |
_version_ |
1724312665158844416 |