Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support

The article is devoted to measuring solvable demand of population for energy supply services and the level of budgetary guardianship in Khabarovsk Krai. The authors show the differentiation in availability of energy supply services for consumers, explained by the geographical contrasts and existing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dyomina Olga, Naiden Svetlana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197701007
id doaj-fbb64f0d28f04d45bf6ba3b5bb892a7e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fbb64f0d28f04d45bf6ba3b5bb892a7e2021-02-02T00:59:10ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422019-01-01770100710.1051/e3sconf/20197701007e3sconf_repar18_01007Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary supportDyomina OlgaNaiden SvetlanaThe article is devoted to measuring solvable demand of population for energy supply services and the level of budgetary guardianship in Khabarovsk Krai. The authors show the differentiation in availability of energy supply services for consumers, explained by the geographical contrasts and existing system of settlement. There are two sources of energy supply in Krai: “Far Eastern Generating Company” (AO “DGK”) and objects of public energetics. The population pays for only a part of actual producers’ costs for energy supply services; the remaining part is compensated by the state through budgetary means. There are two ways to compensate high tariffs on energy supply for population: subsidies and privileges for consumers and subsidies for producers. The population that gets its energy from AO “DGK” pays for energy supply services almost entirely, while population that uses the services of public energetics pays only partially, with the state taking the burden upon itself to compensate the producers’ costs. In case of transitioning to full compensation, the scale of social budgetary support will increase significantly, which contradicts the logic of institutional transformation, aimed at lowering the financial burden of the state.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197701007
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dyomina Olga
Naiden Svetlana
spellingShingle Dyomina Olga
Naiden Svetlana
Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Dyomina Olga
Naiden Svetlana
author_sort Dyomina Olga
title Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support
title_short Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support
title_full Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support
title_fullStr Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support
title_full_unstemmed Energy supply in the Khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support
title_sort energy supply in the khabarovsk territory: intra-regional differentiation and problems of budgetary support
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The article is devoted to measuring solvable demand of population for energy supply services and the level of budgetary guardianship in Khabarovsk Krai. The authors show the differentiation in availability of energy supply services for consumers, explained by the geographical contrasts and existing system of settlement. There are two sources of energy supply in Krai: “Far Eastern Generating Company” (AO “DGK”) and objects of public energetics. The population pays for only a part of actual producers’ costs for energy supply services; the remaining part is compensated by the state through budgetary means. There are two ways to compensate high tariffs on energy supply for population: subsidies and privileges for consumers and subsidies for producers. The population that gets its energy from AO “DGK” pays for energy supply services almost entirely, while population that uses the services of public energetics pays only partially, with the state taking the burden upon itself to compensate the producers’ costs. In case of transitioning to full compensation, the scale of social budgetary support will increase significantly, which contradicts the logic of institutional transformation, aimed at lowering the financial burden of the state.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197701007
work_keys_str_mv AT dyominaolga energysupplyinthekhabarovskterritoryintraregionaldifferentiationandproblemsofbudgetarysupport
AT naidensvetlana energysupplyinthekhabarovskterritoryintraregionaldifferentiationandproblemsofbudgetarysupport
_version_ 1724312665158844416