Six Key Topics for Automated Assessment Utilisation and Acceptance
Automated assessment technologies have been used in education for decades (e.g., computerised multiple choice tests). In contrast, Automated Essay Grading (AEG) technologies: have existed for decades; are `good in theory' (e.g., as accurate as humans, temporally and financially efficient, and c...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius University
2011-04-01
|
Series: | Informatics in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mii.lt/informatics_in_education/pdf/INFE181.pdf |
id |
doaj-fba4747af5e841659243455fff6ec99a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fba4747af5e841659243455fff6ec99a2021-01-02T13:33:16ZengVilnius UniversityInformatics in Education1648-58312011-04-011014764Six Key Topics for Automated Assessment Utilisation and AcceptanceTorsten REINERS0Carl DREHER1Heinz DREHER2Institute of Information Systems, University of Hamburg Hamburg, Germany Curtin Business School, Curtin University Perth, Western AustraliaInstitute of Information Systems, University of Hamburg Hamburg, Germany Curtin Business School, Curtin University Perth, Western AustraliaInstitute of Information Systems, University of Hamburg Hamburg, Germany Curtin Business School, Curtin University Perth, Western AustraliaAutomated assessment technologies have been used in education for decades (e.g., computerised multiple choice tests). In contrast, Automated Essay Grading (AEG) technologies: have existed for decades; are `good in theory' (e.g., as accurate as humans, temporally and financially efficient, and can enhance formative feedback), and yet; are ostensibly used comparatively infrequently in Australian universities. To empirically examine these experiential observations we conducted a national survey to explore the use of automated assessment in Australian universities and examine why adoption of AEG is limited. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected in an online survey from a sample of 265 staff and students from 5 Australian universities. The type of assessment used by the greatest proportion of respondents was essays/reports (82.6%), however very few respondents had used AEG (3.8%). Recommendations are made regarding methods to promote technology utilisation, including the use of innovative dissemination channels such as 3D Virtual Worlds.http://www.mii.lt/informatics_in_education/pdf/INFE181.pdfautomated assessmentautomated essay gradingtechnology acceptancebenefits realisationmixed methods research |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Torsten REINERS Carl DREHER Heinz DREHER |
spellingShingle |
Torsten REINERS Carl DREHER Heinz DREHER Six Key Topics for Automated Assessment Utilisation and Acceptance Informatics in Education automated assessment automated essay grading technology acceptance benefits realisation mixed methods research |
author_facet |
Torsten REINERS Carl DREHER Heinz DREHER |
author_sort |
Torsten REINERS |
title |
Six Key Topics for Automated Assessment Utilisation and Acceptance |
title_short |
Six Key Topics for Automated Assessment Utilisation and Acceptance |
title_full |
Six Key Topics for Automated Assessment Utilisation and Acceptance |
title_fullStr |
Six Key Topics for Automated Assessment Utilisation and Acceptance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Six Key Topics for Automated Assessment Utilisation and Acceptance |
title_sort |
six key topics for automated assessment utilisation and acceptance |
publisher |
Vilnius University |
series |
Informatics in Education |
issn |
1648-5831 |
publishDate |
2011-04-01 |
description |
Automated assessment technologies have been used in education for decades (e.g., computerised multiple choice tests). In contrast, Automated Essay Grading (AEG) technologies: have existed for decades; are `good in theory' (e.g., as accurate as humans, temporally and financially efficient, and can enhance formative feedback), and yet; are ostensibly used comparatively infrequently in Australian universities. To empirically examine these experiential observations we conducted a national survey to explore the use of automated assessment in Australian universities and examine why adoption of AEG is limited. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected in an online survey from a sample of 265 staff and students from 5 Australian universities. The type of assessment used by the greatest proportion of respondents was essays/reports (82.6%), however very few respondents had used AEG (3.8%). Recommendations are made regarding methods to promote technology utilisation, including the use of innovative dissemination channels such as 3D Virtual Worlds. |
topic |
automated assessment automated essay grading technology acceptance benefits realisation mixed methods research |
url |
http://www.mii.lt/informatics_in_education/pdf/INFE181.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT torstenreiners sixkeytopicsforautomatedassessmentutilisationandacceptance AT carldreher sixkeytopicsforautomatedassessmentutilisationandacceptance AT heinzdreher sixkeytopicsforautomatedassessmentutilisationandacceptance |
_version_ |
1724353912480202752 |