Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis

The adaptation tipping point and adaptation pathway approach developed to make decisions under deep uncertainty do not shed light on which among the multiple available pathways should be chosen as the preferred pathway. This creates the need to extend these approaches by means of suitable tools that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nishtha Manocha, Vladan Babovic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-02-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/2/229
id doaj-fb98e1a80ac54ddfadf25da716b1e5aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb98e1a80ac54ddfadf25da716b1e5aa2020-11-25T00:12:34ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412018-02-0110222910.3390/w10020229w10020229Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options AnalysisNishtha Manocha0Vladan Babovic1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, SingaporeDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, SingaporeThe adaptation tipping point and adaptation pathway approach developed to make decisions under deep uncertainty do not shed light on which among the multiple available pathways should be chosen as the preferred pathway. This creates the need to extend these approaches by means of suitable tools that can help sequence actions and subsequently enable the outlining of relevant policies. This paper presents two sequencing approaches, namely, the “Build to Target” and “Build Up” approach, to aid in sub-selecting a set of preferred pathways. Both approaches differ in the levels of flexibility they offer. They are exemplified by means of two case studies wherein the Net Present Valuation and the Real Options Analysis are employed as selection criterions. The results demonstrate the benefit of these two approaches when used in conjunction with the adaptation pathways and show how the pathways selected by means of a Build to Target approach generally have a value greater than, or at least the same as, the pathways selected by the Build Up approach. Further, this paper also demonstrates the capacity of Real Options to quantify and capture the economic value of flexibility, which cannot be done by traditional valuation approaches such as Net Present Valuation.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/2/229deep uncertaintyReal Options Analysissequencing approaches
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nishtha Manocha
Vladan Babovic
spellingShingle Nishtha Manocha
Vladan Babovic
Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis
Water
deep uncertainty
Real Options Analysis
sequencing approaches
author_facet Nishtha Manocha
Vladan Babovic
author_sort Nishtha Manocha
title Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis
title_short Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis
title_full Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis
title_fullStr Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis
title_sort sequencing infrastructure investments under deep uncertainty using real options analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2018-02-01
description The adaptation tipping point and adaptation pathway approach developed to make decisions under deep uncertainty do not shed light on which among the multiple available pathways should be chosen as the preferred pathway. This creates the need to extend these approaches by means of suitable tools that can help sequence actions and subsequently enable the outlining of relevant policies. This paper presents two sequencing approaches, namely, the “Build to Target” and “Build Up” approach, to aid in sub-selecting a set of preferred pathways. Both approaches differ in the levels of flexibility they offer. They are exemplified by means of two case studies wherein the Net Present Valuation and the Real Options Analysis are employed as selection criterions. The results demonstrate the benefit of these two approaches when used in conjunction with the adaptation pathways and show how the pathways selected by means of a Build to Target approach generally have a value greater than, or at least the same as, the pathways selected by the Build Up approach. Further, this paper also demonstrates the capacity of Real Options to quantify and capture the economic value of flexibility, which cannot be done by traditional valuation approaches such as Net Present Valuation.
topic deep uncertainty
Real Options Analysis
sequencing approaches
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/2/229
work_keys_str_mv AT nishthamanocha sequencinginfrastructureinvestmentsunderdeepuncertaintyusingrealoptionsanalysis
AT vladanbabovic sequencinginfrastructureinvestmentsunderdeepuncertaintyusingrealoptionsanalysis
_version_ 1725398908165685248