Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis
The adaptation tipping point and adaptation pathway approach developed to make decisions under deep uncertainty do not shed light on which among the multiple available pathways should be chosen as the preferred pathway. This creates the need to extend these approaches by means of suitable tools that...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Water |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/2/229 |
id |
doaj-fb98e1a80ac54ddfadf25da716b1e5aa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fb98e1a80ac54ddfadf25da716b1e5aa2020-11-25T00:12:34ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412018-02-0110222910.3390/w10020229w10020229Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options AnalysisNishtha Manocha0Vladan Babovic1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, SingaporeDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, SingaporeThe adaptation tipping point and adaptation pathway approach developed to make decisions under deep uncertainty do not shed light on which among the multiple available pathways should be chosen as the preferred pathway. This creates the need to extend these approaches by means of suitable tools that can help sequence actions and subsequently enable the outlining of relevant policies. This paper presents two sequencing approaches, namely, the “Build to Target” and “Build Up” approach, to aid in sub-selecting a set of preferred pathways. Both approaches differ in the levels of flexibility they offer. They are exemplified by means of two case studies wherein the Net Present Valuation and the Real Options Analysis are employed as selection criterions. The results demonstrate the benefit of these two approaches when used in conjunction with the adaptation pathways and show how the pathways selected by means of a Build to Target approach generally have a value greater than, or at least the same as, the pathways selected by the Build Up approach. Further, this paper also demonstrates the capacity of Real Options to quantify and capture the economic value of flexibility, which cannot be done by traditional valuation approaches such as Net Present Valuation.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/2/229deep uncertaintyReal Options Analysissequencing approaches |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nishtha Manocha Vladan Babovic |
spellingShingle |
Nishtha Manocha Vladan Babovic Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis Water deep uncertainty Real Options Analysis sequencing approaches |
author_facet |
Nishtha Manocha Vladan Babovic |
author_sort |
Nishtha Manocha |
title |
Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis |
title_short |
Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis |
title_full |
Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sequencing Infrastructure Investments under Deep Uncertainty Using Real Options Analysis |
title_sort |
sequencing infrastructure investments under deep uncertainty using real options analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Water |
issn |
2073-4441 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
The adaptation tipping point and adaptation pathway approach developed to make decisions under deep uncertainty do not shed light on which among the multiple available pathways should be chosen as the preferred pathway. This creates the need to extend these approaches by means of suitable tools that can help sequence actions and subsequently enable the outlining of relevant policies. This paper presents two sequencing approaches, namely, the “Build to Target” and “Build Up” approach, to aid in sub-selecting a set of preferred pathways. Both approaches differ in the levels of flexibility they offer. They are exemplified by means of two case studies wherein the Net Present Valuation and the Real Options Analysis are employed as selection criterions. The results demonstrate the benefit of these two approaches when used in conjunction with the adaptation pathways and show how the pathways selected by means of a Build to Target approach generally have a value greater than, or at least the same as, the pathways selected by the Build Up approach. Further, this paper also demonstrates the capacity of Real Options to quantify and capture the economic value of flexibility, which cannot be done by traditional valuation approaches such as Net Present Valuation. |
topic |
deep uncertainty Real Options Analysis sequencing approaches |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/2/229 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nishthamanocha sequencinginfrastructureinvestmentsunderdeepuncertaintyusingrealoptionsanalysis AT vladanbabovic sequencinginfrastructureinvestmentsunderdeepuncertaintyusingrealoptionsanalysis |
_version_ |
1725398908165685248 |