The impact of the global crisis on transition economies
All forecasts for transition countries - the 29 EBRD countries of operation - since mid-2008 have been repeatedly downgraded. The latest forecasts (May 2009) envisage an average income decline of 5 per cent in 2009 and only a small recovery of 1.4 per cent in 2010; performance is very diverse. In ge...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Economics, Belgrade
2009-01-01
|
Series: | Ekonomski Anali |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2009/0013-32640981007N.pdf |
id |
doaj-fb71f0747e874dd48af0dbf418ddd1e0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fb71f0747e874dd48af0dbf418ddd1e02020-11-24T22:24:06ZengFaculty of Economics, BelgradeEkonomski Anali0013-32642009-01-015418172010.2298/EKA0981007NThe impact of the global crisis on transition economiesNuti Mario D.All forecasts for transition countries - the 29 EBRD countries of operation - since mid-2008 have been repeatedly downgraded. The latest forecasts (May 2009) envisage an average income decline of 5 per cent in 2009 and only a small recovery of 1.4 per cent in 2010; performance is very diverse. In general, transition countries faced two shocks: a sudden stop and reversal of capital inflows, and an exports collapse due to the global slump. More specific factors include: 1) Home made sub-primes (domestic loans to households, enterprises and governments originally denominated in foreign currency); 2) External imbalances; 3) Worsening terms of trade for primary products exporters; 4) Fall or reversal of FDI and portfolio investment inflows; 5) Funds withdrawal by foreign banks; 6) External demand reduction; 7) Differences in initial positions and policy response. Earlier membership of the Euro by the new member states through a relaxation of Maastricht rules might have been beneficial, but the current crisis is no time for changing or bending rules. By comparison with the transition recession of the 1990s, the current recession is much smaller and shorter, it benefits from more generous assistance from the international community, and from the more enlightened fiscal and monetary policies now uncharacteristically recommended by International Financial Organizations. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2009/0013-32640981007N.pdfglobal crisistransition economiesinternational financial organizations |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nuti Mario D. |
spellingShingle |
Nuti Mario D. The impact of the global crisis on transition economies Ekonomski Anali global crisis transition economies international financial organizations |
author_facet |
Nuti Mario D. |
author_sort |
Nuti Mario D. |
title |
The impact of the global crisis on transition economies |
title_short |
The impact of the global crisis on transition economies |
title_full |
The impact of the global crisis on transition economies |
title_fullStr |
The impact of the global crisis on transition economies |
title_full_unstemmed |
The impact of the global crisis on transition economies |
title_sort |
impact of the global crisis on transition economies |
publisher |
Faculty of Economics, Belgrade |
series |
Ekonomski Anali |
issn |
0013-3264 |
publishDate |
2009-01-01 |
description |
All forecasts for transition countries - the 29 EBRD countries of operation - since mid-2008 have been repeatedly downgraded. The latest forecasts (May 2009) envisage an average income decline of 5 per cent in 2009 and only a small recovery of 1.4 per cent in 2010; performance is very diverse. In general, transition countries faced two shocks: a sudden stop and reversal of capital inflows, and an exports collapse due to the global slump. More specific factors include: 1) Home made sub-primes (domestic loans to households, enterprises and governments originally denominated in foreign currency); 2) External imbalances; 3) Worsening terms of trade for primary products exporters; 4) Fall or reversal of FDI and portfolio investment inflows; 5) Funds withdrawal by foreign banks; 6) External demand reduction; 7) Differences in initial positions and policy response. Earlier membership of the Euro by the new member states through a relaxation of Maastricht rules might have been beneficial, but the current crisis is no time for changing or bending rules. By comparison with the transition recession of the 1990s, the current recession is much smaller and shorter, it benefits from more generous assistance from the international community, and from the more enlightened fiscal and monetary policies now uncharacteristically recommended by International Financial Organizations. |
topic |
global crisis transition economies international financial organizations |
url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2009/0013-32640981007N.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nutimariod theimpactoftheglobalcrisisontransitioneconomies AT nutimariod impactoftheglobalcrisisontransitioneconomies |
_version_ |
1725762275782950912 |