The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy
There has been increased interest in trade policy following the UK’s EU membership referendum. However, relatively little scholarly analysis has been produced on how Brexit will affect EU trade policy. Instead, the received wisdom has been that Brexit will shift the EU’s trade policy position in a l...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Politics and Governance |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2102 |
id |
doaj-fb6bfb9cdd124adaa5e50577b686316e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fb6bfb9cdd124adaa5e50577b686316e2020-11-25T00:07:24ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632019-09-017371810.17645/pag.v7i3.21021139The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade PolicyFerdi De Ville0Gabriel Siles-Brügge1Centre for EU Studies, Ghent University, BelgiumDepartment of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, UKThere has been increased interest in trade policy following the UK’s EU membership referendum. However, relatively little scholarly analysis has been produced on how Brexit will affect EU trade policy. Instead, the received wisdom has been that Brexit will shift the EU’s trade policy position in a less liberal direction. This is based on a ‘static’ analysis where the UK variable is simply removed from the figurative ‘function’ determining EU trade policy. We argue that this neglects the potential role of more ‘dynamic’ effects. First, the negotiations to determine the nature of the EU–UK future economic partnership are likely to involve a lengthy process with a still uncertain, and possibly evolving, destination. The outcome and process of arriving there will influence how economic operators and policymakers adapt their preferences and behaviour, including through possible relocation and the formation of new alliances. This will shape EU trade policy in potentially counterintuitive ways. Second, the absence of clear material structures from which actors can ‘read’ their interests highlights the importance of considering the role of ideas and political framing. How the vote for and consequences of Brexit are interpreted will likely shape what is considered an appropriate policy response. Examining EU trade policy since the Brexit vote, the article finds that rather than push the EU in a more illiberal direction, the referendum result has been used to reinforce the European Commission’s external liberalisation agenda. The Commission’s discursive response to Brexit and Donald Trump has been to portray the EU as a champion of free trade in an era of global populism.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2102Brexitdiscoursedynamic effectsEuropean Uniontrade policyUnited Kingdomuncertainty |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ferdi De Ville Gabriel Siles-Brügge |
spellingShingle |
Ferdi De Ville Gabriel Siles-Brügge The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy Politics and Governance Brexit discourse dynamic effects European Union trade policy United Kingdom uncertainty |
author_facet |
Ferdi De Ville Gabriel Siles-Brügge |
author_sort |
Ferdi De Ville |
title |
The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy |
title_short |
The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy |
title_full |
The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy |
title_fullStr |
The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy |
title_sort |
impact of brexit on eu trade policy |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
series |
Politics and Governance |
issn |
2183-2463 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
There has been increased interest in trade policy following the UK’s EU membership referendum. However, relatively little scholarly analysis has been produced on how Brexit will affect EU trade policy. Instead, the received wisdom has been that Brexit will shift the EU’s trade policy position in a less liberal direction. This is based on a ‘static’ analysis where the UK variable is simply removed from the figurative ‘function’ determining EU trade policy. We argue that this neglects the potential role of more ‘dynamic’ effects. First, the negotiations to determine the nature of the EU–UK future economic partnership are likely to involve a lengthy process with a still uncertain, and possibly evolving, destination. The outcome and process of arriving there will influence how economic operators and policymakers adapt their preferences and behaviour, including through possible relocation and the formation of new alliances. This will shape EU trade policy in potentially counterintuitive ways. Second, the absence of clear material structures from which actors can ‘read’ their interests highlights the importance of considering the role of ideas and political framing. How the vote for and consequences of Brexit are interpreted will likely shape what is considered an appropriate policy response. Examining EU trade policy since the Brexit vote, the article finds that rather than push the EU in a more illiberal direction, the referendum result has been used to reinforce the European Commission’s external liberalisation agenda. The Commission’s discursive response to Brexit and Donald Trump has been to portray the EU as a champion of free trade in an era of global populism. |
topic |
Brexit discourse dynamic effects European Union trade policy United Kingdom uncertainty |
url |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2102 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ferdideville theimpactofbrexitoneutradepolicy AT gabrielsilesbrugge theimpactofbrexitoneutradepolicy AT ferdideville impactofbrexitoneutradepolicy AT gabrielsilesbrugge impactofbrexitoneutradepolicy |
_version_ |
1725418520795152384 |