The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy

There has been increased interest in trade policy following the UK’s EU membership referendum. However, relatively little scholarly analysis has been produced on how Brexit will affect EU trade policy. Instead, the received wisdom has been that Brexit will shift the EU’s trade policy position in a l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferdi De Ville, Gabriel Siles-Brügge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2019-09-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2102
id doaj-fb6bfb9cdd124adaa5e50577b686316e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb6bfb9cdd124adaa5e50577b686316e2020-11-25T00:07:24ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632019-09-017371810.17645/pag.v7i3.21021139The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade PolicyFerdi De Ville0Gabriel Siles-Brügge1Centre for EU Studies, Ghent University, BelgiumDepartment of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, UKThere has been increased interest in trade policy following the UK’s EU membership referendum. However, relatively little scholarly analysis has been produced on how Brexit will affect EU trade policy. Instead, the received wisdom has been that Brexit will shift the EU’s trade policy position in a less liberal direction. This is based on a ‘static’ analysis where the UK variable is simply removed from the figurative ‘function’ determining EU trade policy. We argue that this neglects the potential role of more ‘dynamic’ effects. First, the negotiations to determine the nature of the EU–UK future economic partnership are likely to involve a lengthy process with a still uncertain, and possibly evolving, destination. The outcome and process of arriving there will influence how economic operators and policymakers adapt their preferences and behaviour, including through possible relocation and the formation of new alliances. This will shape EU trade policy in potentially counterintuitive ways. Second, the absence of clear material structures from which actors can ‘read’ their interests highlights the importance of considering the role of ideas and political framing. How the vote for and consequences of Brexit are interpreted will likely shape what is considered an appropriate policy response. Examining EU trade policy since the Brexit vote, the article finds that rather than push the EU in a more illiberal direction, the referendum result has been used to reinforce the European Commission’s external liberalisation agenda. The Commission’s discursive response to Brexit and Donald Trump has been to portray the EU as a champion of free trade in an era of global populism.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2102Brexitdiscoursedynamic effectsEuropean Uniontrade policyUnited Kingdomuncertainty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ferdi De Ville
Gabriel Siles-Brügge
spellingShingle Ferdi De Ville
Gabriel Siles-Brügge
The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy
Politics and Governance
Brexit
discourse
dynamic effects
European Union
trade policy
United Kingdom
uncertainty
author_facet Ferdi De Ville
Gabriel Siles-Brügge
author_sort Ferdi De Ville
title The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy
title_short The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy
title_full The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy
title_fullStr The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy
title_sort impact of brexit on eu trade policy
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2019-09-01
description There has been increased interest in trade policy following the UK’s EU membership referendum. However, relatively little scholarly analysis has been produced on how Brexit will affect EU trade policy. Instead, the received wisdom has been that Brexit will shift the EU’s trade policy position in a less liberal direction. This is based on a ‘static’ analysis where the UK variable is simply removed from the figurative ‘function’ determining EU trade policy. We argue that this neglects the potential role of more ‘dynamic’ effects. First, the negotiations to determine the nature of the EU–UK future economic partnership are likely to involve a lengthy process with a still uncertain, and possibly evolving, destination. The outcome and process of arriving there will influence how economic operators and policymakers adapt their preferences and behaviour, including through possible relocation and the formation of new alliances. This will shape EU trade policy in potentially counterintuitive ways. Second, the absence of clear material structures from which actors can ‘read’ their interests highlights the importance of considering the role of ideas and political framing. How the vote for and consequences of Brexit are interpreted will likely shape what is considered an appropriate policy response. Examining EU trade policy since the Brexit vote, the article finds that rather than push the EU in a more illiberal direction, the referendum result has been used to reinforce the European Commission’s external liberalisation agenda. The Commission’s discursive response to Brexit and Donald Trump has been to portray the EU as a champion of free trade in an era of global populism.
topic Brexit
discourse
dynamic effects
European Union
trade policy
United Kingdom
uncertainty
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2102
work_keys_str_mv AT ferdideville theimpactofbrexitoneutradepolicy
AT gabrielsilesbrugge theimpactofbrexitoneutradepolicy
AT ferdideville impactofbrexitoneutradepolicy
AT gabrielsilesbrugge impactofbrexitoneutradepolicy
_version_ 1725418520795152384