The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is seen as a prerequisite for gaining and maintaining competitiveness. Simultaneously, the relationship between FDI and financial development (FD) has important implications for the researched economy and its competitiveness. This domain has not been sufficiently inv...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tomas Bata University in Zlín
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Competitiveness |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cjournal.cz/files/397.pdf |
id |
doaj-fb66e55a5f0a4c75967ecad9519016a0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fb66e55a5f0a4c75967ecad9519016a02021-04-10T15:16:23ZengTomas Bata University in ZlínJournal of Competitiveness1804-171X1804-17282021-03-011319511210.7441/joc.2021.01.06The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality AnalysisAbdul Majeed0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5231-8756Ping Jiang1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-2213Mahmood Ahmad2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9974-0150Muhammad Asif Khan3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3563-2951Judit Olah4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2247-1711University of International Business and EconomicsUniversity of International Business and EconomicsUniversity of International Business and EconomicsUniversity of KotliWSB University Foreign direct investment (FDI) is seen as a prerequisite for gaining and maintaining competitiveness. Simultaneously, the relationship between FDI and financial development (FD) has important implications for the researched economy and its competitiveness. This domain has not been sufficiently investigated, with diverse and contradictory findings evident in the literature. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of FDI on FD for the selected 102 Belt and Road Initiative countries on four continents: Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America. Based on data from 1990 to 2017, a set of quantitative techniques, including feasible generalized least squares, and augmented mean group techniques, were used in this study. Our findings indicate that FDI, trade openness, government consumption, and inflation have a statistically significant relationship with FD. FDI, trade openness, and government consumption increased FD in Asia, Europe, and Latin America but decreased in Africa. Inflation shows a negative influence on FD in all continents. Furthermore, the Dumitrescu–Harlin panel causality test confirms a two-way causality relationship among FDI, trade openness, and FD in Asia and Europe. In contrast, a unidirectional relationship exists between FDI and FD in Latin America. The income-wise results reveal that low- and middle-income countries attract more FDI than high-income countries due to high factor costs. These empirical results provide new insights for policymakers, presenting several policy implications for FD competitiveness in the reference regions.https://www.cjournal.cz/files/397.pdfforeign direct investmentfinancial developmentpanel databelt and road initiative |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Abdul Majeed Ping Jiang Mahmood Ahmad Muhammad Asif Khan Judit Olah |
spellingShingle |
Abdul Majeed Ping Jiang Mahmood Ahmad Muhammad Asif Khan Judit Olah The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis Journal of Competitiveness foreign direct investment financial development panel data belt and road initiative |
author_facet |
Abdul Majeed Ping Jiang Mahmood Ahmad Muhammad Asif Khan Judit Olah |
author_sort |
Abdul Majeed |
title |
The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis |
title_short |
The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis |
title_full |
The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis |
title_fullStr |
The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis |
title_sort |
impact of foreign direct investment on financial development: new evidence from panel cointegration and causality analysis |
publisher |
Tomas Bata University in Zlín |
series |
Journal of Competitiveness |
issn |
1804-171X 1804-1728 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is seen as a prerequisite for gaining and maintaining competitiveness. Simultaneously, the relationship between FDI and financial development (FD) has important implications for the researched economy and its competitiveness. This domain has not been sufficiently investigated, with diverse and contradictory findings evident in the literature. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of FDI on FD for the selected 102 Belt and Road Initiative countries on four continents: Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America. Based on data from 1990 to 2017, a set of quantitative techniques, including feasible generalized least squares, and augmented mean group techniques, were used in this study. Our findings indicate that FDI, trade openness, government consumption, and inflation have a statistically significant relationship with FD. FDI, trade openness, and government consumption increased FD in Asia, Europe, and Latin America but decreased in Africa. Inflation shows a negative influence on FD in all continents. Furthermore, the Dumitrescu–Harlin panel causality test confirms a two-way causality relationship among FDI, trade openness, and FD in Asia and Europe. In contrast, a unidirectional relationship exists between FDI and FD in Latin America. The income-wise results reveal that low- and middle-income countries attract more FDI than high-income countries due to high factor costs. These empirical results provide new insights for policymakers, presenting several policy implications for FD competitiveness in the reference regions. |
topic |
foreign direct investment financial development panel data belt and road initiative |
url |
https://www.cjournal.cz/files/397.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT abdulmajeed theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis AT pingjiang theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis AT mahmoodahmad theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis AT muhammadasifkhan theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis AT juditolah theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis AT abdulmajeed impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis AT pingjiang impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis AT mahmoodahmad impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis AT muhammadasifkhan impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis AT juditolah impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis |
_version_ |
1721531892578123776 |