The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is seen as a prerequisite for gaining and maintaining competitiveness. Simultaneously, the relationship between FDI and financial development (FD) has important implications for the researched economy and its competitiveness. This domain has not been sufficiently inv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Majeed, Ping Jiang, Mahmood Ahmad, Muhammad Asif Khan, Judit Olah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tomas Bata University in Zlín 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Competitiveness
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cjournal.cz/files/397.pdf
id doaj-fb66e55a5f0a4c75967ecad9519016a0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb66e55a5f0a4c75967ecad9519016a02021-04-10T15:16:23ZengTomas Bata University in ZlínJournal of Competitiveness1804-171X1804-17282021-03-011319511210.7441/joc.2021.01.06The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality AnalysisAbdul Majeed0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5231-8756Ping Jiang1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-2213Mahmood Ahmad2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9974-0150Muhammad Asif Khan3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3563-2951Judit Olah4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2247-1711University of International Business and EconomicsUniversity of International Business and EconomicsUniversity of International Business and EconomicsUniversity of KotliWSB University Foreign direct investment (FDI) is seen as a prerequisite for gaining and maintaining competitiveness. Simultaneously, the relationship between FDI and financial development (FD) has important implications for the researched economy and its competitiveness. This domain has not been sufficiently investigated, with diverse and contradictory findings evident in the literature. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of FDI on FD for the selected 102 Belt and Road Initiative countries on four continents: Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America. Based on data from 1990 to 2017, a set of quantitative techniques, including feasible generalized least squares, and augmented mean group techniques, were used in this study. Our findings indicate that FDI, trade openness, government consumption, and inflation have a statistically significant relationship with FD. FDI, trade openness, and government consumption increased FD in Asia, Europe, and Latin America but decreased in Africa. Inflation shows a negative influence on FD in all continents. Furthermore, the Dumitrescu–Harlin panel causality test confirms a two-way causality relationship among FDI, trade openness, and FD in Asia and Europe. In contrast, a unidirectional relationship exists between FDI and FD in Latin America. The income-wise results reveal that low- and middle-income countries attract more FDI than high-income countries due to high factor costs. These empirical results provide new insights for policymakers, presenting several policy implications for FD competitiveness in the reference regions.https://www.cjournal.cz/files/397.pdfforeign direct investmentfinancial developmentpanel databelt and road initiative
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdul Majeed
Ping Jiang
Mahmood Ahmad
Muhammad Asif Khan
Judit Olah
spellingShingle Abdul Majeed
Ping Jiang
Mahmood Ahmad
Muhammad Asif Khan
Judit Olah
The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis
Journal of Competitiveness
foreign direct investment
financial development
panel data
belt and road initiative
author_facet Abdul Majeed
Ping Jiang
Mahmood Ahmad
Muhammad Asif Khan
Judit Olah
author_sort Abdul Majeed
title The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis
title_short The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis
title_full The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis
title_fullStr The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Financial Development: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis
title_sort impact of foreign direct investment on financial development: new evidence from panel cointegration and causality analysis
publisher Tomas Bata University in Zlín
series Journal of Competitiveness
issn 1804-171X
1804-1728
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Foreign direct investment (FDI) is seen as a prerequisite for gaining and maintaining competitiveness. Simultaneously, the relationship between FDI and financial development (FD) has important implications for the researched economy and its competitiveness. This domain has not been sufficiently investigated, with diverse and contradictory findings evident in the literature. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of FDI on FD for the selected 102 Belt and Road Initiative countries on four continents: Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America. Based on data from 1990 to 2017, a set of quantitative techniques, including feasible generalized least squares, and augmented mean group techniques, were used in this study. Our findings indicate that FDI, trade openness, government consumption, and inflation have a statistically significant relationship with FD. FDI, trade openness, and government consumption increased FD in Asia, Europe, and Latin America but decreased in Africa. Inflation shows a negative influence on FD in all continents. Furthermore, the Dumitrescu–Harlin panel causality test confirms a two-way causality relationship among FDI, trade openness, and FD in Asia and Europe. In contrast, a unidirectional relationship exists between FDI and FD in Latin America. The income-wise results reveal that low- and middle-income countries attract more FDI than high-income countries due to high factor costs. These empirical results provide new insights for policymakers, presenting several policy implications for FD competitiveness in the reference regions.
topic foreign direct investment
financial development
panel data
belt and road initiative
url https://www.cjournal.cz/files/397.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulmajeed theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
AT pingjiang theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
AT mahmoodahmad theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
AT muhammadasifkhan theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
AT juditolah theimpactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
AT abdulmajeed impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
AT pingjiang impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
AT mahmoodahmad impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
AT muhammadasifkhan impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
AT juditolah impactofforeigndirectinvestmentonfinancialdevelopmentnewevidencefrompanelcointegrationandcausalityanalysis
_version_ 1721531892578123776