Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample
The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (GARS-2) is a widely used screening instrument that assists in the identification and diagnosis of autism. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, internal consistency, and screening sensitivity of the GARS-2 using ratings from sp...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Autism Research and Treatment |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8243079 |
id |
doaj-fb653324e245400d8fced1d9553ab22d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fb653324e245400d8fced1d9553ab22d2020-11-25T00:18:35ZengHindawi LimitedAutism Research and Treatment2090-19252090-19332016-01-01201610.1155/2016/82430798243079Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities SampleMartin A. Volker0Elissa H. Dua1Christopher Lopata2Marcus L. Thomeer3Jennifer A. Toomey4Audrey M. Smerbeck5Jonathan D. Rodgers6Joshua R. Popkin7Andrew T. Nelson8Gloria K. Lee9Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1034, USADepartment of Counseling, School and Educational Psychology, Graduate School of Education, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-1000, USAInstitute for Autism Research, Canisius College, 2001 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14208, USAInstitute for Autism Research, Canisius College, 2001 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14208, USASummit Educational Resources, 150 Stahl Road, Getzville, NY 14068, USAPsychology Department, College of Liberal Arts, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14230, USAInstitute for Autism Research, Canisius College, 2001 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14208, USADepartment of Counseling, School and Educational Psychology, Graduate School of Education, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-1000, USASummit Educational Resources, 150 Stahl Road, Getzville, NY 14068, USADepartment of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1034, USAThe Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (GARS-2) is a widely used screening instrument that assists in the identification and diagnosis of autism. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, internal consistency, and screening sensitivity of the GARS-2 using ratings from special education teaching staff for a sample of 240 individuals with autism or other significant developmental disabilities. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a correlated three-factor solution similar to that found in 2005 by Lecavalier for the original GARS. Though the three factors appeared to be reasonably consistent with the intended constructs of the three GARS-2 subscales, the analysis indicated that more than a third of the GARS-2 items were assigned to the wrong subscale. Internal consistency estimates met or exceeded standards for screening and were generally higher than those in previous studies. Screening sensitivity was .65 and specificity was .81 for the Autism Index using a cut score of 85. Based on these findings, recommendations are made for instrument revision.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8243079 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Martin A. Volker Elissa H. Dua Christopher Lopata Marcus L. Thomeer Jennifer A. Toomey Audrey M. Smerbeck Jonathan D. Rodgers Joshua R. Popkin Andrew T. Nelson Gloria K. Lee |
spellingShingle |
Martin A. Volker Elissa H. Dua Christopher Lopata Marcus L. Thomeer Jennifer A. Toomey Audrey M. Smerbeck Jonathan D. Rodgers Joshua R. Popkin Andrew T. Nelson Gloria K. Lee Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample Autism Research and Treatment |
author_facet |
Martin A. Volker Elissa H. Dua Christopher Lopata Marcus L. Thomeer Jennifer A. Toomey Audrey M. Smerbeck Jonathan D. Rodgers Joshua R. Popkin Andrew T. Nelson Gloria K. Lee |
author_sort |
Martin A. Volker |
title |
Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample |
title_short |
Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample |
title_full |
Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample |
title_fullStr |
Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample |
title_full_unstemmed |
Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample |
title_sort |
factor structure, internal consistency, and screening sensitivity of the gars-2 in a developmental disabilities sample |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Autism Research and Treatment |
issn |
2090-1925 2090-1933 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (GARS-2) is a widely used screening instrument that assists in the identification and diagnosis of autism. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, internal consistency, and screening sensitivity of the GARS-2 using ratings from special education teaching staff for a sample of 240 individuals with autism or other significant developmental disabilities. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a correlated three-factor solution similar to that found in 2005 by Lecavalier for the original GARS. Though the three factors appeared to be reasonably consistent with the intended constructs of the three GARS-2 subscales, the analysis indicated that more than a third of the GARS-2 items were assigned to the wrong subscale. Internal consistency estimates met or exceeded standards for screening and were generally higher than those in previous studies. Screening sensitivity was .65 and specificity was .81 for the Autism Index using a cut score of 85. Based on these findings, recommendations are made for instrument revision. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8243079 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT martinavolker factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample AT elissahdua factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample AT christopherlopata factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample AT marcuslthomeer factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample AT jenniferatoomey factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample AT audreymsmerbeck factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample AT jonathandrodgers factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample AT joshuarpopkin factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample AT andrewtnelson factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample AT gloriaklee factorstructureinternalconsistencyandscreeningsensitivityofthegars2inadevelopmentaldisabilitiessample |
_version_ |
1725375696683925504 |