Prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: A point prevalence observational study.

INTRODUCTION:Frailty is an important concept in modern healthcare due to its association with adverse outcomes. Its prevalence varies in the literature and there is a paucity of literature looking at the prevalence of frailty in an inpatient setting. Its significance lies on its impact on resource u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon J G Richards, Joel D'Souza, Rebecca Pascoe, Michelle Falloon, Frank A Frizelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219083
id doaj-fb64d410821e451ab596ca4d52dbe82e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb64d410821e451ab596ca4d52dbe82e2021-03-03T20:35:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01147e021908310.1371/journal.pone.0219083Prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: A point prevalence observational study.Simon J G RichardsJoel D'SouzaRebecca PascoeMichelle FalloonFrank A FrizelleINTRODUCTION:Frailty is an important concept in modern healthcare due to its association with adverse outcomes. Its prevalence varies in the literature and there is a paucity of literature looking at the prevalence of frailty in an inpatient setting. Its significance lies on its impact on resource utilisation and costs. AIM:To determine the prevalence of frailty in the adult population in a tertiary New Zealand hospital. METHODS:Eligible patients aged 18 years and over were invited to participate, and frailty assessment was performed using the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale. A score of 8 or more was considered frail. Factors associated with frailty were assessed. RESULTS:Of 640 occupied inpatient beds, 420 patients were assessed. 220 patients were excluded, of which 89 were absent from their bed-space, 73 declined and 41 were critically unwell. The overall prevalence of frailty across assessed patients was 48.8%. The prevalence of frailty increased significantly with age; patients aged 85 and over were significantly more likely to be frail compared to those aged under 65 (OR 6.25, 95% CI 3.17-12.7). Maori patients were significantly more likely to be frail (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.45-11.9). When compared to those patients admitted to a medical specialty, patients admitted to surgical specialty were less likely to be frail (OR 0.52 95% CI 0.31-0.86) and those admitted for rehabilitation were more likely to be frail (OR 1.86 95% CI 1.03-3.41). Frail patients were more likely to come from a rest home (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.38-6.14) or hospital level care (OR 9.62, 95% CI 2.68-61.6). CONCLUSION:Frailty is highly prevalent in the hospital setting with 48.8% of all inpatients classified as frail. This high number of frail patients has significant resource implications and an increased understanding of the burden of frailty in this population may aid targeting of interventions towards this vulnerable population.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219083
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simon J G Richards
Joel D'Souza
Rebecca Pascoe
Michelle Falloon
Frank A Frizelle
spellingShingle Simon J G Richards
Joel D'Souza
Rebecca Pascoe
Michelle Falloon
Frank A Frizelle
Prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: A point prevalence observational study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Simon J G Richards
Joel D'Souza
Rebecca Pascoe
Michelle Falloon
Frank A Frizelle
author_sort Simon J G Richards
title Prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: A point prevalence observational study.
title_short Prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: A point prevalence observational study.
title_full Prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: A point prevalence observational study.
title_fullStr Prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: A point prevalence observational study.
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: A point prevalence observational study.
title_sort prevalence of frailty in a tertiary hospital: a point prevalence observational study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description INTRODUCTION:Frailty is an important concept in modern healthcare due to its association with adverse outcomes. Its prevalence varies in the literature and there is a paucity of literature looking at the prevalence of frailty in an inpatient setting. Its significance lies on its impact on resource utilisation and costs. AIM:To determine the prevalence of frailty in the adult population in a tertiary New Zealand hospital. METHODS:Eligible patients aged 18 years and over were invited to participate, and frailty assessment was performed using the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale. A score of 8 or more was considered frail. Factors associated with frailty were assessed. RESULTS:Of 640 occupied inpatient beds, 420 patients were assessed. 220 patients were excluded, of which 89 were absent from their bed-space, 73 declined and 41 were critically unwell. The overall prevalence of frailty across assessed patients was 48.8%. The prevalence of frailty increased significantly with age; patients aged 85 and over were significantly more likely to be frail compared to those aged under 65 (OR 6.25, 95% CI 3.17-12.7). Maori patients were significantly more likely to be frail (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.45-11.9). When compared to those patients admitted to a medical specialty, patients admitted to surgical specialty were less likely to be frail (OR 0.52 95% CI 0.31-0.86) and those admitted for rehabilitation were more likely to be frail (OR 1.86 95% CI 1.03-3.41). Frail patients were more likely to come from a rest home (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.38-6.14) or hospital level care (OR 9.62, 95% CI 2.68-61.6). CONCLUSION:Frailty is highly prevalent in the hospital setting with 48.8% of all inpatients classified as frail. This high number of frail patients has significant resource implications and an increased understanding of the burden of frailty in this population may aid targeting of interventions towards this vulnerable population.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219083
work_keys_str_mv AT simonjgrichards prevalenceoffrailtyinatertiaryhospitalapointprevalenceobservationalstudy
AT joeldsouza prevalenceoffrailtyinatertiaryhospitalapointprevalenceobservationalstudy
AT rebeccapascoe prevalenceoffrailtyinatertiaryhospitalapointprevalenceobservationalstudy
AT michellefalloon prevalenceoffrailtyinatertiaryhospitalapointprevalenceobservationalstudy
AT frankafrizelle prevalenceoffrailtyinatertiaryhospitalapointprevalenceobservationalstudy
_version_ 1714821717401010176