The IMSI Procedure Improves Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes without Compromising the Aneuploidy Rate When Compared to the Classical ICSI Procedure

Purpose The intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) procedure has been associated with better laboratory and clinical outcomes in assisted reproduction technologies. Less information is available regarding the relationship between embryo aneuploidy rate and the IMSI procedur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Luna, Roly Hilario, Julio Dueñas-Chacón, Rocío Romero, Patricia Zavala, Lucy Villegas, Javier García-Ferreyra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Reproductive Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/CMRH.S33032
id doaj-fb5bf59119ca4711b4575792cf0ec47f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb5bf59119ca4711b4575792cf0ec47f2020-11-25T03:14:06ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Reproductive Health1179-55812015-01-01910.4137/CMRH.S33032The IMSI Procedure Improves Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes without Compromising the Aneuploidy Rate When Compared to the Classical ICSI ProcedureDaniel Luna0Roly Hilario1Julio Dueñas-Chacón2Rocío Romero3Patricia Zavala4Lucy Villegas5Javier García-Ferreyra6FERTILAB Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Lima, Perú.PROCREAR Fertility Center, Lima, Perú.PROCREAR Fertility Center, Lima, Perú.PROCREAR Fertility Center, Lima, Perú.PROCREAR Fertility Center, Lima, Perú.FERTILAB Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Lima, Perú.FERTILAB Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Lima, Perú.Purpose The intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) procedure has been associated with better laboratory and clinical outcomes in assisted reproduction technologies. Less information is available regarding the relationship between embryo aneuploidy rate and the IMSI procedure. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and chromosomal status of IMSI-derived embryos with those obtained from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in order to establish a clearer view of the benefits of IMSI in infertile patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a total of 11 cycles of IMSI and 20 cycles of ICSI with preimplantation genetic diagnosis. The fertilization rate, cleavage rate, embryo quality, blastocyst development, aneuploidy rate, pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and miscarriage rate were compared between the groups. Results Similar rates of fertilization (70% and 73%), cleavage (98% and 100%), and aneuploidy (76.9% and 70.9%) were observed in the IMSI and ICSI groups, respectively. The IMSI group had significantly more good quality embryos at day 3 (95% vs 73%), higher blastocyst development rates (33% vs 19%), and greater number of hatching blastocysts (43% vs 28%), cycles with at least one blastocyst at day 5 (55% vs 35%), and blastocysts with good trophoectoderm morphology (21% vs 6%) compared with the ICSI group ( P < 0.001). Significantly higher implantation rates were observed in the IMSI group compared with the ICSI group (57% vs 27%; P < 0.05). Pregnancy and miscarriage rates were similar in both groups (80% vs 50% and 0% vs 33%, respectively). Conclusion The IMSI procedure significantly improves the embryo quality/development by increasing the implantation rates without affecting the chromosomal status of embryos. There is a tendency for the IMSI procedure to enhance the pregnancy rates and lower the miscarriage rates when compared with ICSI.https://doi.org/10.4137/CMRH.S33032
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Luna
Roly Hilario
Julio Dueñas-Chacón
Rocío Romero
Patricia Zavala
Lucy Villegas
Javier García-Ferreyra
spellingShingle Daniel Luna
Roly Hilario
Julio Dueñas-Chacón
Rocío Romero
Patricia Zavala
Lucy Villegas
Javier García-Ferreyra
The IMSI Procedure Improves Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes without Compromising the Aneuploidy Rate When Compared to the Classical ICSI Procedure
Clinical Medicine Insights: Reproductive Health
author_facet Daniel Luna
Roly Hilario
Julio Dueñas-Chacón
Rocío Romero
Patricia Zavala
Lucy Villegas
Javier García-Ferreyra
author_sort Daniel Luna
title The IMSI Procedure Improves Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes without Compromising the Aneuploidy Rate When Compared to the Classical ICSI Procedure
title_short The IMSI Procedure Improves Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes without Compromising the Aneuploidy Rate When Compared to the Classical ICSI Procedure
title_full The IMSI Procedure Improves Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes without Compromising the Aneuploidy Rate When Compared to the Classical ICSI Procedure
title_fullStr The IMSI Procedure Improves Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes without Compromising the Aneuploidy Rate When Compared to the Classical ICSI Procedure
title_full_unstemmed The IMSI Procedure Improves Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes without Compromising the Aneuploidy Rate When Compared to the Classical ICSI Procedure
title_sort imsi procedure improves laboratory and clinical outcomes without compromising the aneuploidy rate when compared to the classical icsi procedure
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Reproductive Health
issn 1179-5581
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Purpose The intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) procedure has been associated with better laboratory and clinical outcomes in assisted reproduction technologies. Less information is available regarding the relationship between embryo aneuploidy rate and the IMSI procedure. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and chromosomal status of IMSI-derived embryos with those obtained from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in order to establish a clearer view of the benefits of IMSI in infertile patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a total of 11 cycles of IMSI and 20 cycles of ICSI with preimplantation genetic diagnosis. The fertilization rate, cleavage rate, embryo quality, blastocyst development, aneuploidy rate, pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and miscarriage rate were compared between the groups. Results Similar rates of fertilization (70% and 73%), cleavage (98% and 100%), and aneuploidy (76.9% and 70.9%) were observed in the IMSI and ICSI groups, respectively. The IMSI group had significantly more good quality embryos at day 3 (95% vs 73%), higher blastocyst development rates (33% vs 19%), and greater number of hatching blastocysts (43% vs 28%), cycles with at least one blastocyst at day 5 (55% vs 35%), and blastocysts with good trophoectoderm morphology (21% vs 6%) compared with the ICSI group ( P < 0.001). Significantly higher implantation rates were observed in the IMSI group compared with the ICSI group (57% vs 27%; P < 0.05). Pregnancy and miscarriage rates were similar in both groups (80% vs 50% and 0% vs 33%, respectively). Conclusion The IMSI procedure significantly improves the embryo quality/development by increasing the implantation rates without affecting the chromosomal status of embryos. There is a tendency for the IMSI procedure to enhance the pregnancy rates and lower the miscarriage rates when compared with ICSI.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/CMRH.S33032
work_keys_str_mv AT danielluna theimsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT rolyhilario theimsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT julioduenaschacon theimsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT rocioromero theimsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT patriciazavala theimsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT lucyvillegas theimsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT javiergarciaferreyra theimsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT danielluna imsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT rolyhilario imsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT julioduenaschacon imsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT rocioromero imsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT patriciazavala imsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT lucyvillegas imsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
AT javiergarciaferreyra imsiprocedureimproveslaboratoryandclinicaloutcomeswithoutcompromisingtheaneuploidyratewhencomparedtotheclassicalicsiprocedure
_version_ 1724644462505754624