Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study

Abstract Background Titanium plate (TP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) spacers are widely used during open-door laminoplasty, performed with the patient in a prone position. Reducing operative time is an important consideration, particularly to reduce the risk of postoperative complications in older patien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takahiro Inui, Koichi Inokuchi, Yoshinobu Watanabe, Kentaro Matsui, Yuhei Nakayama, Keisuke Ishii, Takashi Suzuki, Taketo Kurozumi, Hirotaka Kawano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1539-5
id doaj-fb3b9bce4c0e4be286f998794ba77c3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb3b9bce4c0e4be286f998794ba77c3a2021-01-03T12:12:50ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2019-12-011411810.1186/s13018-019-1539-5Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective studyTakahiro Inui0Koichi Inokuchi1Yoshinobu Watanabe2Kentaro Matsui3Yuhei Nakayama4Keisuke Ishii5Takashi Suzuki6Taketo Kurozumi7Hirotaka Kawano8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of MedicineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of MedicineDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of MedicineTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Teikyo University HospitalTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Teikyo University HospitalTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Teikyo University HospitalTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Teikyo University HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of MedicineAbstract Background Titanium plate (TP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) spacers are widely used during open-door laminoplasty, performed with the patient in a prone position. Reducing operative time is an important consideration, particularly to reduce the risk of postoperative complications in older patients. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the operative time for open-door laminoplasty using TP or HA spacers. Methods Consecutive patients with a spinal cord injury, without bone injury, and ≥ 50 years of age were included. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the operative time between patients in the TP and HA group, adjusting for known factors that can influence surgical and postoperative outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to confirm the robustness of the primary outcome. The cumulative incidence of postoperative complications over 1-year after surgery was also compared. Results Of the 164 patients forming our study group, TP spacers were used in 62 and HA in 102. Operative time was significantly shorter for the TP (128 min) than HA (158 min) group (p < 0.001). Both multivariate and propensity score matching analyses confirmed a significant reduction in operative time for the TP, compared to HA, group (regression coefficient, − 30 min and − 38 min, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions The use of TP spacers reduced the operative time for cervical open-door laminoplasty by about 30 min, compared to the use of HA spacers, with no difference in the rate of postoperative complications.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1539-5Open door laminoplastyLaminoplastyOperation timeHydroxyapatiteTitanium plateRetrospective
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Takahiro Inui
Koichi Inokuchi
Yoshinobu Watanabe
Kentaro Matsui
Yuhei Nakayama
Keisuke Ishii
Takashi Suzuki
Taketo Kurozumi
Hirotaka Kawano
spellingShingle Takahiro Inui
Koichi Inokuchi
Yoshinobu Watanabe
Kentaro Matsui
Yuhei Nakayama
Keisuke Ishii
Takashi Suzuki
Taketo Kurozumi
Hirotaka Kawano
Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Open door laminoplasty
Laminoplasty
Operation time
Hydroxyapatite
Titanium plate
Retrospective
author_facet Takahiro Inui
Koichi Inokuchi
Yoshinobu Watanabe
Kentaro Matsui
Yuhei Nakayama
Keisuke Ishii
Takashi Suzuki
Taketo Kurozumi
Hirotaka Kawano
author_sort Takahiro Inui
title Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study
title_short Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study
title_full Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study
publisher BMC
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
issn 1749-799X
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Background Titanium plate (TP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) spacers are widely used during open-door laminoplasty, performed with the patient in a prone position. Reducing operative time is an important consideration, particularly to reduce the risk of postoperative complications in older patients. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the operative time for open-door laminoplasty using TP or HA spacers. Methods Consecutive patients with a spinal cord injury, without bone injury, and ≥ 50 years of age were included. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the operative time between patients in the TP and HA group, adjusting for known factors that can influence surgical and postoperative outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to confirm the robustness of the primary outcome. The cumulative incidence of postoperative complications over 1-year after surgery was also compared. Results Of the 164 patients forming our study group, TP spacers were used in 62 and HA in 102. Operative time was significantly shorter for the TP (128 min) than HA (158 min) group (p < 0.001). Both multivariate and propensity score matching analyses confirmed a significant reduction in operative time for the TP, compared to HA, group (regression coefficient, − 30 min and − 38 min, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions The use of TP spacers reduced the operative time for cervical open-door laminoplasty by about 30 min, compared to the use of HA spacers, with no difference in the rate of postoperative complications.
topic Open door laminoplasty
Laminoplasty
Operation time
Hydroxyapatite
Titanium plate
Retrospective
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1539-5
work_keys_str_mv AT takahiroinui comparisonoftheoperativetimeforopendoorlaminoplastyusingtitaniumplatespacersorhydroxyapatiteblockspacersaretrospectivestudy
AT koichiinokuchi comparisonoftheoperativetimeforopendoorlaminoplastyusingtitaniumplatespacersorhydroxyapatiteblockspacersaretrospectivestudy
AT yoshinobuwatanabe comparisonoftheoperativetimeforopendoorlaminoplastyusingtitaniumplatespacersorhydroxyapatiteblockspacersaretrospectivestudy
AT kentaromatsui comparisonoftheoperativetimeforopendoorlaminoplastyusingtitaniumplatespacersorhydroxyapatiteblockspacersaretrospectivestudy
AT yuheinakayama comparisonoftheoperativetimeforopendoorlaminoplastyusingtitaniumplatespacersorhydroxyapatiteblockspacersaretrospectivestudy
AT keisukeishii comparisonoftheoperativetimeforopendoorlaminoplastyusingtitaniumplatespacersorhydroxyapatiteblockspacersaretrospectivestudy
AT takashisuzuki comparisonoftheoperativetimeforopendoorlaminoplastyusingtitaniumplatespacersorhydroxyapatiteblockspacersaretrospectivestudy
AT taketokurozumi comparisonoftheoperativetimeforopendoorlaminoplastyusingtitaniumplatespacersorhydroxyapatiteblockspacersaretrospectivestudy
AT hirotakakawano comparisonoftheoperativetimeforopendoorlaminoplastyusingtitaniumplatespacersorhydroxyapatiteblockspacersaretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1724350654058594304