Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one US state

Several initiatives have addressed patient safety by enabling electronic voluntary reporting of adverse events within academic medical centres in urban settings. Such initiatives are lacking in the rural context, and it remains unknown whether the same challenges and solutions apply to rural hospita...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George Demiris, Timothy Patrick, Suzanne Boren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT 2004-11-01
Series:Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/121
id doaj-fb351f6a4be946f3ab6abf5744eb3a46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fb351f6a4be946f3ab6abf5744eb3a462020-11-25T00:32:00ZengBCS, The Chartered Institute for ITJournal of Innovation in Health Informatics2058-45552058-45632004-11-0112315716210.14236/jhi.v12i3.121100Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one US stateGeorge DemirisTimothy PatrickSuzanne BorenSeveral initiatives have addressed patient safety by enabling electronic voluntary reporting of adverse events within academic medical centres in urban settings. Such initiatives are lacking in the rural context, and it remains unknown whether the same challenges and solutions apply to rural hospitals. The purpose of this study is to provide insight into the organisational culture and level of readiness to adopt patient safety strategies in a rural setting, as well as to identify critical issues pertaining to the rural context that need to inform the design of such strategies. We conducted telephone interviews with administrators and healthcare providers of rural hospitals in one US state. Questions referred to the respondents’ current reporting mechanism, its advantages and disadvantages, and organisational patient safety culture. A total of 16 administrators and 14 providers of eight rural hospitals in the state of Missouri were interviewed. Findings indicate that very few administrators felt that there was a timely response to adverse event reports. Half of the administrators stated that the current mechanism is an appropriate and adequate outlet to ensure patient safety. None of the healthcare providers found errors and adverse events to be over-reported; the majority believe that they are being under-reported. Only 36% of the care providers interviewed have themselves reported an error or adverse drug event during their tenure with their organisation. The study findings demonstrate a definite need for improvement of the current infrastructure of rural hospitals in order to enable an effective outlet for ensuring patient safety.https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/121adverse eventsmedical errorspatient safetyrural health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author George Demiris
Timothy Patrick
Suzanne Boren
spellingShingle George Demiris
Timothy Patrick
Suzanne Boren
Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one US state
Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
adverse events
medical errors
patient safety
rural health
author_facet George Demiris
Timothy Patrick
Suzanne Boren
author_sort George Demiris
title Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one US state
title_short Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one US state
title_full Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one US state
title_fullStr Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one US state
title_full_unstemmed Assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one US state
title_sort assessing patient safety awareness and needs in rural hospitals in one us state
publisher BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
series Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
issn 2058-4555
2058-4563
publishDate 2004-11-01
description Several initiatives have addressed patient safety by enabling electronic voluntary reporting of adverse events within academic medical centres in urban settings. Such initiatives are lacking in the rural context, and it remains unknown whether the same challenges and solutions apply to rural hospitals. The purpose of this study is to provide insight into the organisational culture and level of readiness to adopt patient safety strategies in a rural setting, as well as to identify critical issues pertaining to the rural context that need to inform the design of such strategies. We conducted telephone interviews with administrators and healthcare providers of rural hospitals in one US state. Questions referred to the respondents’ current reporting mechanism, its advantages and disadvantages, and organisational patient safety culture. A total of 16 administrators and 14 providers of eight rural hospitals in the state of Missouri were interviewed. Findings indicate that very few administrators felt that there was a timely response to adverse event reports. Half of the administrators stated that the current mechanism is an appropriate and adequate outlet to ensure patient safety. None of the healthcare providers found errors and adverse events to be over-reported; the majority believe that they are being under-reported. Only 36% of the care providers interviewed have themselves reported an error or adverse drug event during their tenure with their organisation. The study findings demonstrate a definite need for improvement of the current infrastructure of rural hospitals in order to enable an effective outlet for ensuring patient safety.
topic adverse events
medical errors
patient safety
rural health
url https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/121
work_keys_str_mv AT georgedemiris assessingpatientsafetyawarenessandneedsinruralhospitalsinoneusstate
AT timothypatrick assessingpatientsafetyawarenessandneedsinruralhospitalsinoneusstate
AT suzanneboren assessingpatientsafetyawarenessandneedsinruralhospitalsinoneusstate
_version_ 1725321455766339584