Religiosity as a source of comfort and struggle in members of religious movements: a comparative analysis of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal

This study aims to examine various aspects of religiosity in members of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. First, we assigned intergroup differences in Emotions toward God, Religious Comfort and Strain and Religious Attributions. Next, we estimated the net effects of Emoti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zarzycka Beata, Pietruszka Rafał, Śliwak Jacek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2015-12-01
Series:Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/pepsi-2015-0004
id doaj-facd016f555e49b09fbacd5f64d0075f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-facd016f555e49b09fbacd5f64d0075f2021-09-05T14:00:53ZengSciendoJournal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration1733-39112300-09452015-12-01211-29111410.2478/pepsi-2015-0004pepsi-2015-0004Religiosity as a source of comfort and struggle in members of religious movements: a comparative analysis of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic RenewalZarzycka BeataPietruszka RafałŚliwak JacekThis study aims to examine various aspects of religiosity in members of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. First, we assigned intergroup differences in Emotions toward God, Religious Comfort and Strain and Religious Attributions. Next, we estimated the net effects of Emotions toward God, Religious Comfort and Strain and Religious Attributions on religiosity. One hundred fifty–five people participated in the research, 81 members of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal and 74 members of the Neocatechumenal Way. We applied the Religious Comfort and Strain Scale by Yali, Exline, Wood, and Worthington, the Emotions toward God Scale by Huber and the Religious Attributions Scale by Exline, Park, Smyth and Carey. The results suggest that members of the Neocatechumenal Way do not differ from the Catholic Charismatic Renewal’s members in Religious Comfort and Positive Emotions toward God. However, the members of the Neocatechumenal Way scored higher in Religious Strain. A moderating effect of the religious movement on the relation between Fear of God and religiosity was observed.https://doi.org/10.2478/pepsi-2015-0004religious movementemotions toward godreligious comfort and strainreligious attributions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zarzycka Beata
Pietruszka Rafał
Śliwak Jacek
spellingShingle Zarzycka Beata
Pietruszka Rafał
Śliwak Jacek
Religiosity as a source of comfort and struggle in members of religious movements: a comparative analysis of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal
Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration
religious movement
emotions toward god
religious comfort and strain
religious attributions
author_facet Zarzycka Beata
Pietruszka Rafał
Śliwak Jacek
author_sort Zarzycka Beata
title Religiosity as a source of comfort and struggle in members of religious movements: a comparative analysis of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal
title_short Religiosity as a source of comfort and struggle in members of religious movements: a comparative analysis of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal
title_full Religiosity as a source of comfort and struggle in members of religious movements: a comparative analysis of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal
title_fullStr Religiosity as a source of comfort and struggle in members of religious movements: a comparative analysis of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal
title_full_unstemmed Religiosity as a source of comfort and struggle in members of religious movements: a comparative analysis of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal
title_sort religiosity as a source of comfort and struggle in members of religious movements: a comparative analysis of the neocatechumenal way and the catholic charismatic renewal
publisher Sciendo
series Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration
issn 1733-3911
2300-0945
publishDate 2015-12-01
description This study aims to examine various aspects of religiosity in members of the Neocatechumenal Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. First, we assigned intergroup differences in Emotions toward God, Religious Comfort and Strain and Religious Attributions. Next, we estimated the net effects of Emotions toward God, Religious Comfort and Strain and Religious Attributions on religiosity. One hundred fifty–five people participated in the research, 81 members of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal and 74 members of the Neocatechumenal Way. We applied the Religious Comfort and Strain Scale by Yali, Exline, Wood, and Worthington, the Emotions toward God Scale by Huber and the Religious Attributions Scale by Exline, Park, Smyth and Carey. The results suggest that members of the Neocatechumenal Way do not differ from the Catholic Charismatic Renewal’s members in Religious Comfort and Positive Emotions toward God. However, the members of the Neocatechumenal Way scored higher in Religious Strain. A moderating effect of the religious movement on the relation between Fear of God and religiosity was observed.
topic religious movement
emotions toward god
religious comfort and strain
religious attributions
url https://doi.org/10.2478/pepsi-2015-0004
work_keys_str_mv AT zarzyckabeata religiosityasasourceofcomfortandstruggleinmembersofreligiousmovementsacomparativeanalysisoftheneocatechumenalwayandthecatholiccharismaticrenewal
AT pietruszkarafał religiosityasasourceofcomfortandstruggleinmembersofreligiousmovementsacomparativeanalysisoftheneocatechumenalwayandthecatholiccharismaticrenewal
AT sliwakjacek religiosityasasourceofcomfortandstruggleinmembersofreligiousmovementsacomparativeanalysisoftheneocatechumenalwayandthecatholiccharismaticrenewal
_version_ 1717811185725734912