Corruption and sex
Taking into account the difference between the ancient and modern (even postmodern) understandings of corruption, I am curious to explore why the bond linking corruption and sex seems so obvious. I have no intention of investigating both phenomena in the context of any moral category. What then...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | Filozofija i Društvo |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2013/0353-57381301021M.pdf |
| id |
doaj-fac9bd6445bb4cf8b049c0023776e652 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-fac9bd6445bb4cf8b049c0023776e6522020-11-25T00:19:03ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382013-01-01241213210.2298/FID1301021MCorruption and sexMilutinović-Bojanić SanjaTaking into account the difference between the ancient and modern (even postmodern) understandings of corruption, I am curious to explore why the bond linking corruption and sex seems so obvious. I have no intention of investigating both phenomena in the context of any moral category. What then did Flaubert have on his mind when he wrote that Rodolphe “treated Emma quite sans façon. He made of her something supple and corrupt.” What underpins the irresistible attraction between corruption and sex? Why is it impossible to eradicate corruption and repress sex and perceive them as solely functional strategies of generation and reproduction? This short outline follows certain philosophical remarks of Luce Irigaray and her thematization of the sexual difference in the demarcation of generation and corruption.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2013/0353-57381301021M.pdfcorruptionsexsexual differencegenerationAristotleIrigarayMadame BovaryFlaubert |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
deu |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Milutinović-Bojanić Sanja |
| spellingShingle |
Milutinović-Bojanić Sanja Corruption and sex Filozofija i Društvo corruption sex sexual difference generation Aristotle Irigaray Madame Bovary Flaubert |
| author_facet |
Milutinović-Bojanić Sanja |
| author_sort |
Milutinović-Bojanić Sanja |
| title |
Corruption and sex |
| title_short |
Corruption and sex |
| title_full |
Corruption and sex |
| title_fullStr |
Corruption and sex |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Corruption and sex |
| title_sort |
corruption and sex |
| publisher |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade |
| series |
Filozofija i Društvo |
| issn |
0353-5738 |
| publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
| description |
Taking into account the difference between the ancient and modern (even postmodern) understandings of corruption, I am curious to explore why the bond linking corruption and sex seems so obvious. I have no intention of investigating both phenomena in the context of any moral category. What then did Flaubert have on his mind when he wrote that Rodolphe “treated Emma quite sans façon. He made of her something supple and corrupt.” What underpins the irresistible attraction between corruption and sex? Why is it impossible to eradicate corruption and repress sex and perceive them as solely functional strategies of generation and reproduction? This short outline follows certain philosophical remarks of Luce Irigaray and her thematization of the sexual difference in the demarcation of generation and corruption. |
| topic |
corruption sex sexual difference generation Aristotle Irigaray Madame Bovary Flaubert |
| url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2013/0353-57381301021M.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT milutinovicbojanicsanja corruptionandsex |
| _version_ |
1725373593458573312 |