Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals
Background: The aim of the study is to compare instrumentation time between manual (H-files) and rotary (Mtwo) files along with patient and operator compliance in primary lower molars. Materials and Methods: 30 primary teeth were selected and divided into two groups of 15 in each group instrumented...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=6;spage=899;epage=903;aulast=Krishna |
id |
doaj-fac859b0cc5f41b8a55de601a21c04c7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fac859b0cc5f41b8a55de601a21c04c72020-11-25T01:12:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032019-01-0130689990310.4103/ijdr.IJDR_59_18Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root CanalsD R Murali KrishnaJyothsna Vittoba SettyIla SrinivasanAnjana MelwaniBackground: The aim of the study is to compare instrumentation time between manual (H-files) and rotary (Mtwo) files along with patient and operator compliance in primary lower molars. Materials and Methods: 30 primary teeth were selected and divided into two groups of 15 in each group instrumented with H-files and Mtwo files respectively. Time taken for instrumentation was calculated using stop watch. Patient and operator compliance was recorded through questionnaire. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi Square test was used to compare the distribution of teeth and number of canals. Independent Student t test was used to compare the mean time taken for instrumentation with both techniques in different canals and the mean overall time for instrumentation where P value is less than 0.001. Chi Square Goodness of Fit test was used to compare the patient's and operator's perspective regarding instrumentation techniques. Results: The instrumentation time recorded with Mtwo files is less when compared with H–files. 66.7% children preferred H–files over Mtwo, 60% children reported pain while using H–files, 60% of children were scared on sight of Mtwo rotary system. Operator could manage 80% of children easily while using H–files, but it was found that operator ease of comfort was more with Mtwo rotary system. Conclusion: Time taken for instrumentation with Mtwo files was less as compared to H-files. It was convenient for the operator to manage the child using H-files but with the use of Mtwo files, marked reduction in the instrumentation time was appreciated.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=6;spage=899;epage=903;aulast=Krishnah-filesinstrumentation timemtwo rotary systemoperator compliancepatient compliance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
D R Murali Krishna Jyothsna Vittoba Setty Ila Srinivasan Anjana Melwani |
spellingShingle |
D R Murali Krishna Jyothsna Vittoba Setty Ila Srinivasan Anjana Melwani Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals Indian Journal of Dental Research h-files instrumentation time mtwo rotary system operator compliance patient compliance |
author_facet |
D R Murali Krishna Jyothsna Vittoba Setty Ila Srinivasan Anjana Melwani |
author_sort |
D R Murali Krishna |
title |
Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals |
title_short |
Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals |
title_full |
Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals |
title_sort |
comparison between rotary (mtwo) and manual (h-files) techniques for instrumentation of primary teeth root canals |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Indian Journal of Dental Research |
issn |
0970-9290 1998-3603 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Background: The aim of the study is to compare instrumentation time between manual (H-files) and rotary (Mtwo) files along with patient and operator compliance in primary lower molars. Materials and Methods: 30 primary teeth were selected and divided into two groups of 15 in each group instrumented with H-files and Mtwo files respectively. Time taken for instrumentation was calculated using stop watch. Patient and operator compliance was recorded through questionnaire. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi Square test was used to compare the distribution of teeth and number of canals. Independent Student t test was used to compare the mean time taken for instrumentation with both techniques in different canals and the mean overall time for instrumentation where P value is less than 0.001. Chi Square Goodness of Fit test was used to compare the patient's and operator's perspective regarding instrumentation techniques. Results: The instrumentation time recorded with Mtwo files is less when compared with H–files. 66.7% children preferred H–files over Mtwo, 60% children reported pain while using H–files, 60% of children were scared on sight of Mtwo rotary system. Operator could manage 80% of children easily while using H–files, but it was found that operator ease of comfort was more with Mtwo rotary system. Conclusion: Time taken for instrumentation with Mtwo files was less as compared to H-files. It was convenient for the operator to manage the child using H-files but with the use of Mtwo files, marked reduction in the instrumentation time was appreciated. |
topic |
h-files instrumentation time mtwo rotary system operator compliance patient compliance |
url |
http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=6;spage=899;epage=903;aulast=Krishna |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT drmuralikrishna comparisonbetweenrotarymtwoandmanualhfilestechniquesforinstrumentationofprimaryteethrootcanals AT jyothsnavittobasetty comparisonbetweenrotarymtwoandmanualhfilestechniquesforinstrumentationofprimaryteethrootcanals AT ilasrinivasan comparisonbetweenrotarymtwoandmanualhfilestechniquesforinstrumentationofprimaryteethrootcanals AT anjanamelwani comparisonbetweenrotarymtwoandmanualhfilestechniquesforinstrumentationofprimaryteethrootcanals |
_version_ |
1725166140211068928 |