Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals

Background: The aim of the study is to compare instrumentation time between manual (H-files) and rotary (Mtwo) files along with patient and operator compliance in primary lower molars. Materials and Methods: 30 primary teeth were selected and divided into two groups of 15 in each group instrumented...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D R Murali Krishna, Jyothsna Vittoba Setty, Ila Srinivasan, Anjana Melwani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=6;spage=899;epage=903;aulast=Krishna
id doaj-fac859b0cc5f41b8a55de601a21c04c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fac859b0cc5f41b8a55de601a21c04c72020-11-25T01:12:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032019-01-0130689990310.4103/ijdr.IJDR_59_18Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root CanalsD R Murali KrishnaJyothsna Vittoba SettyIla SrinivasanAnjana MelwaniBackground: The aim of the study is to compare instrumentation time between manual (H-files) and rotary (Mtwo) files along with patient and operator compliance in primary lower molars. Materials and Methods: 30 primary teeth were selected and divided into two groups of 15 in each group instrumented with H-files and Mtwo files respectively. Time taken for instrumentation was calculated using stop watch. Patient and operator compliance was recorded through questionnaire. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi Square test was used to compare the distribution of teeth and number of canals. Independent Student t test was used to compare the mean time taken for instrumentation with both techniques in different canals and the mean overall time for instrumentation where P value is less than 0.001. Chi Square Goodness of Fit test was used to compare the patient's and operator's perspective regarding instrumentation techniques. Results: The instrumentation time recorded with Mtwo files is less when compared with H–files. 66.7% children preferred H–files over Mtwo, 60% children reported pain while using H–files, 60% of children were scared on sight of Mtwo rotary system. Operator could manage 80% of children easily while using H–files, but it was found that operator ease of comfort was more with Mtwo rotary system. Conclusion: Time taken for instrumentation with Mtwo files was less as compared to H-files. It was convenient for the operator to manage the child using H-files but with the use of Mtwo files, marked reduction in the instrumentation time was appreciated.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=6;spage=899;epage=903;aulast=Krishnah-filesinstrumentation timemtwo rotary systemoperator compliancepatient compliance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D R Murali Krishna
Jyothsna Vittoba Setty
Ila Srinivasan
Anjana Melwani
spellingShingle D R Murali Krishna
Jyothsna Vittoba Setty
Ila Srinivasan
Anjana Melwani
Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals
Indian Journal of Dental Research
h-files
instrumentation time
mtwo rotary system
operator compliance
patient compliance
author_facet D R Murali Krishna
Jyothsna Vittoba Setty
Ila Srinivasan
Anjana Melwani
author_sort D R Murali Krishna
title Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals
title_short Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals
title_full Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals
title_fullStr Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Rotary (Mtwo) and Manual (H-Files) Techniques for Instrumentation of Primary Teeth Root Canals
title_sort comparison between rotary (mtwo) and manual (h-files) techniques for instrumentation of primary teeth root canals
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background: The aim of the study is to compare instrumentation time between manual (H-files) and rotary (Mtwo) files along with patient and operator compliance in primary lower molars. Materials and Methods: 30 primary teeth were selected and divided into two groups of 15 in each group instrumented with H-files and Mtwo files respectively. Time taken for instrumentation was calculated using stop watch. Patient and operator compliance was recorded through questionnaire. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi Square test was used to compare the distribution of teeth and number of canals. Independent Student t test was used to compare the mean time taken for instrumentation with both techniques in different canals and the mean overall time for instrumentation where P value is less than 0.001. Chi Square Goodness of Fit test was used to compare the patient's and operator's perspective regarding instrumentation techniques. Results: The instrumentation time recorded with Mtwo files is less when compared with H–files. 66.7% children preferred H–files over Mtwo, 60% children reported pain while using H–files, 60% of children were scared on sight of Mtwo rotary system. Operator could manage 80% of children easily while using H–files, but it was found that operator ease of comfort was more with Mtwo rotary system. Conclusion: Time taken for instrumentation with Mtwo files was less as compared to H-files. It was convenient for the operator to manage the child using H-files but with the use of Mtwo files, marked reduction in the instrumentation time was appreciated.
topic h-files
instrumentation time
mtwo rotary system
operator compliance
patient compliance
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2019;volume=30;issue=6;spage=899;epage=903;aulast=Krishna
work_keys_str_mv AT drmuralikrishna comparisonbetweenrotarymtwoandmanualhfilestechniquesforinstrumentationofprimaryteethrootcanals
AT jyothsnavittobasetty comparisonbetweenrotarymtwoandmanualhfilestechniquesforinstrumentationofprimaryteethrootcanals
AT ilasrinivasan comparisonbetweenrotarymtwoandmanualhfilestechniquesforinstrumentationofprimaryteethrootcanals
AT anjanamelwani comparisonbetweenrotarymtwoandmanualhfilestechniquesforinstrumentationofprimaryteethrootcanals
_version_ 1725166140211068928