Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression in Individuals With Down Syndrome Compared to Typically Developing Children

The present study aims to investigate inhibition in individuals with Down Syndrome compared to typically developing children with different inhibitory tasks tapping response inhibition and interference suppression. Previous studies that aimed to investigate inhibition in individuals with Down Syndro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Traverso, Martina Fontana, Maria Carmen Usai, Maria C. Passolunghi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00660/full
id doaj-fac6083757904a5ab6eaa901cf8b5684
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fac6083757904a5ab6eaa901cf8b56842020-11-24T23:29:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-05-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00660347527Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression in Individuals With Down Syndrome Compared to Typically Developing ChildrenLaura Traverso0Martina Fontana1Maria Carmen Usai2Maria C. Passolunghi3Department of Education Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, ItalyDepartment of Education Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, ItalyThe present study aims to investigate inhibition in individuals with Down Syndrome compared to typically developing children with different inhibitory tasks tapping response inhibition and interference suppression. Previous studies that aimed to investigate inhibition in individuals with Down Syndrome reported contradictory results that are difficult to compare given the different types of inhibitory tasks used and the lack of reference to a theoretical model of inhibition that was tested in children (see Bunge et al., 2002; Gandolfi et al., 2014). Three groups took part in the study: 32 individuals with Down Syndrome (DS) with a mean age of 14 years and 4 months, 35 typically developing children 5 years of age (5TD), and 30 typically developing children 6 years of age (6TD). No difference emerged among the groups in fluid intelligence. Based on a confirmatory factor analysis, two different inhibition factors were identified (response inhibition and interference suppression), and two composite scores were calculated. An ANOVA was then executed with the composite inhibitory scores as dependent variables and group membership as the between-subject variable to explore the group differences in inhibition components. The 6TD group outperformed the 5TD group in both response inhibition and interference suppression component scores. No differences were found in both inhibition components between the DS group and 5TD. In contrast, the 6TD group outperformed the DS group in both response inhibition and in the interference suppression component's scores. Summarizing, our findings show that both response inhibition and interference suppression significantly increased during school transition and that individuals with DS showed a delay in both response inhibition and interference suppression components compared to typically developing 6-year-olds, but their performance was similar to typically developing 5-year-olds.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00660/fullDown Syndromeexecutive functioninhibitioninterference suppressionresponse inhibition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Traverso
Martina Fontana
Maria Carmen Usai
Maria C. Passolunghi
spellingShingle Laura Traverso
Martina Fontana
Maria Carmen Usai
Maria C. Passolunghi
Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression in Individuals With Down Syndrome Compared to Typically Developing Children
Frontiers in Psychology
Down Syndrome
executive function
inhibition
interference suppression
response inhibition
author_facet Laura Traverso
Martina Fontana
Maria Carmen Usai
Maria C. Passolunghi
author_sort Laura Traverso
title Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression in Individuals With Down Syndrome Compared to Typically Developing Children
title_short Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression in Individuals With Down Syndrome Compared to Typically Developing Children
title_full Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression in Individuals With Down Syndrome Compared to Typically Developing Children
title_fullStr Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression in Individuals With Down Syndrome Compared to Typically Developing Children
title_full_unstemmed Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression in Individuals With Down Syndrome Compared to Typically Developing Children
title_sort response inhibition and interference suppression in individuals with down syndrome compared to typically developing children
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-05-01
description The present study aims to investigate inhibition in individuals with Down Syndrome compared to typically developing children with different inhibitory tasks tapping response inhibition and interference suppression. Previous studies that aimed to investigate inhibition in individuals with Down Syndrome reported contradictory results that are difficult to compare given the different types of inhibitory tasks used and the lack of reference to a theoretical model of inhibition that was tested in children (see Bunge et al., 2002; Gandolfi et al., 2014). Three groups took part in the study: 32 individuals with Down Syndrome (DS) with a mean age of 14 years and 4 months, 35 typically developing children 5 years of age (5TD), and 30 typically developing children 6 years of age (6TD). No difference emerged among the groups in fluid intelligence. Based on a confirmatory factor analysis, two different inhibition factors were identified (response inhibition and interference suppression), and two composite scores were calculated. An ANOVA was then executed with the composite inhibitory scores as dependent variables and group membership as the between-subject variable to explore the group differences in inhibition components. The 6TD group outperformed the 5TD group in both response inhibition and interference suppression component scores. No differences were found in both inhibition components between the DS group and 5TD. In contrast, the 6TD group outperformed the DS group in both response inhibition and in the interference suppression component's scores. Summarizing, our findings show that both response inhibition and interference suppression significantly increased during school transition and that individuals with DS showed a delay in both response inhibition and interference suppression components compared to typically developing 6-year-olds, but their performance was similar to typically developing 5-year-olds.
topic Down Syndrome
executive function
inhibition
interference suppression
response inhibition
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00660/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lauratraverso responseinhibitionandinterferencesuppressioninindividualswithdownsyndromecomparedtotypicallydevelopingchildren
AT martinafontana responseinhibitionandinterferencesuppressioninindividualswithdownsyndromecomparedtotypicallydevelopingchildren
AT mariacarmenusai responseinhibitionandinterferencesuppressioninindividualswithdownsyndromecomparedtotypicallydevelopingchildren
AT mariacpassolunghi responseinhibitionandinterferencesuppressioninindividualswithdownsyndromecomparedtotypicallydevelopingchildren
_version_ 1725544437323399168