Driving departmental change through evaluation: some outcomes and problems

This paper will focus upon some of the outcomes from the first year of the Courseware for History Implementation Consortium (Chic), a Teaching and Learning Technology Programme (TLTP), Phase 3 project. It is particularly important that the consortium addresses the issue of embedding change within or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard Hall, Derek Harding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Learning Technology 2000-12-01
Series:Research in Learning Technology
Online Access:http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/11975
id doaj-fab0e2738fc74d298d776142ebd93c68
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fab0e2738fc74d298d776142ebd93c682020-11-24T22:30:49ZengAssociation for Learning Technology Research in Learning Technology2156-70692156-70772000-12-018110.3402/rlt.v8i1.11975Driving departmental change through evaluation: some outcomes and problemsRichard HallDerek HardingThis paper will focus upon some of the outcomes from the first year of the Courseware for History Implementation Consortium (Chic), a Teaching and Learning Technology Programme (TLTP), Phase 3 project. It is particularly important that the consortium addresses the issue of embedding change within organizations if it is to succeed in its aims. However, as Brown (1998) has noted, the integration of learning and teaching innovation into the broader fabric of an institution, by projects with a fixed remit and life cycle, is problematic. Here we will investigate how the Chic project has related evaluation outcomes to disciplinary pedagogical imperatives in order to foster a greater sense of purpose and cohesion towards the project and its objectives. This recognizes the value of evaluation in affecting the context of learning, through the iteration of teaching techniques and resource provision. The resultant implications for institutions, and the barriers to change, need to be examined in the light of the pedagogical context of the history discipline. Whilst accepting the premise that change needs to be placed in the context of institutional policy (Hart, Ryan and Bagdon, 1999; Li and Kaye, 1999), this paper will show how a culture of change can be promoted within departments.http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/11975
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard Hall
Derek Harding
spellingShingle Richard Hall
Derek Harding
Driving departmental change through evaluation: some outcomes and problems
Research in Learning Technology
author_facet Richard Hall
Derek Harding
author_sort Richard Hall
title Driving departmental change through evaluation: some outcomes and problems
title_short Driving departmental change through evaluation: some outcomes and problems
title_full Driving departmental change through evaluation: some outcomes and problems
title_fullStr Driving departmental change through evaluation: some outcomes and problems
title_full_unstemmed Driving departmental change through evaluation: some outcomes and problems
title_sort driving departmental change through evaluation: some outcomes and problems
publisher Association for Learning Technology
series Research in Learning Technology
issn 2156-7069
2156-7077
publishDate 2000-12-01
description This paper will focus upon some of the outcomes from the first year of the Courseware for History Implementation Consortium (Chic), a Teaching and Learning Technology Programme (TLTP), Phase 3 project. It is particularly important that the consortium addresses the issue of embedding change within organizations if it is to succeed in its aims. However, as Brown (1998) has noted, the integration of learning and teaching innovation into the broader fabric of an institution, by projects with a fixed remit and life cycle, is problematic. Here we will investigate how the Chic project has related evaluation outcomes to disciplinary pedagogical imperatives in order to foster a greater sense of purpose and cohesion towards the project and its objectives. This recognizes the value of evaluation in affecting the context of learning, through the iteration of teaching techniques and resource provision. The resultant implications for institutions, and the barriers to change, need to be examined in the light of the pedagogical context of the history discipline. Whilst accepting the premise that change needs to be placed in the context of institutional policy (Hart, Ryan and Bagdon, 1999; Li and Kaye, 1999), this paper will show how a culture of change can be promoted within departments.
url http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/11975
work_keys_str_mv AT richardhall drivingdepartmentalchangethroughevaluationsomeoutcomesandproblems
AT derekharding drivingdepartmentalchangethroughevaluationsomeoutcomesandproblems
_version_ 1725739234827960320