Failure of classical elasticity in auxetic foams
Poisson's ratio, ν, was measured for four materials, a rubbery polymer, a conventional soft foam, and two auxetic foams. We find that for the first two materials, having ν ≥ 0.2, the experimental determinations of Poisson's ratio are in good agreement with values calculated from the shear...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AIP Publishing LLC
2013-04-01
|
Series: | AIP Advances |
Online Access: | http://link.aip.org/link/doi/10.1063/1.4802925 |
id |
doaj-faaed3e4c78145ffa94bed1539a968e8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-faaed3e4c78145ffa94bed1539a968e82020-11-25T00:22:20ZengAIP Publishing LLCAIP Advances2158-32262013-04-013404212604212610.1063/1.4802925Failure of classical elasticity in auxetic foamsJ. H. RohC. B. GillerP. H. MottC. M. RolandPoisson's ratio, ν, was measured for four materials, a rubbery polymer, a conventional soft foam, and two auxetic foams. We find that for the first two materials, having ν ≥ 0.2, the experimental determinations of Poisson's ratio are in good agreement with values calculated from the shear and tensile moduli using the equations of classical elasticity. However, for the two auxetic materials (ν < 0), the equations of classical elasticity give values significantly different from the measured ν. We offer an interpretation of these results based on a recently published analysis of the bounds on Poisson's ratio for classical elasticity to be applicable. http://link.aip.org/link/doi/10.1063/1.4802925 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J. H. Roh C. B. Giller P. H. Mott C. M. Roland |
spellingShingle |
J. H. Roh C. B. Giller P. H. Mott C. M. Roland Failure of classical elasticity in auxetic foams AIP Advances |
author_facet |
J. H. Roh C. B. Giller P. H. Mott C. M. Roland |
author_sort |
J. H. Roh |
title |
Failure of classical elasticity in auxetic foams |
title_short |
Failure of classical elasticity in auxetic foams |
title_full |
Failure of classical elasticity in auxetic foams |
title_fullStr |
Failure of classical elasticity in auxetic foams |
title_full_unstemmed |
Failure of classical elasticity in auxetic foams |
title_sort |
failure of classical elasticity in auxetic foams |
publisher |
AIP Publishing LLC |
series |
AIP Advances |
issn |
2158-3226 |
publishDate |
2013-04-01 |
description |
Poisson's ratio, ν, was measured for four materials, a rubbery polymer, a conventional soft foam, and two auxetic foams. We find that for the first two materials, having ν ≥ 0.2, the experimental determinations of Poisson's ratio are in good agreement with values calculated from the shear and tensile moduli using the equations of classical elasticity. However, for the two auxetic materials (ν < 0), the equations of classical elasticity give values significantly different from the measured ν. We offer an interpretation of these results based on a recently published analysis of the bounds on Poisson's ratio for classical elasticity to be applicable. |
url |
http://link.aip.org/link/doi/10.1063/1.4802925 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jhroh failureofclassicalelasticityinauxeticfoams AT cbgiller failureofclassicalelasticityinauxeticfoams AT phmott failureofclassicalelasticityinauxeticfoams AT cmroland failureofclassicalelasticityinauxeticfoams |
_version_ |
1725360325345148928 |