A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community

Purpose - The aim of the study is to reveal the main characteristics of the domestic tourism-economics literature, as well as to compare the contributions made by the tourism, economics and administrative science (EAS) academia. The purpose is to identify the most distinctive aspects, more specific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yakup Kemal Özekici
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Isarder 2021-06-01
Series:İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.isarder.org/index.php/isarder/article/view/1345
id doaj-faad03f22f814796ab12065a4d283783
record_format Article
spelling doaj-faad03f22f814796ab12065a4d2837832021-06-23T21:42:02ZengIsarderİşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi1309-07122021-06-01131A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic CommunityYakup Kemal Özekici0Adiyaman University, Tourism faculty, Adiyaman, Turkey Purpose - The aim of the study is to reveal the main characteristics of the domestic tourism-economics literature, as well as to compare the contributions made by the tourism, economics and administrative science (EAS) academia. The purpose is to identify the most distinctive aspects, more specifically, subjects (subdivision of economics, main topics, subtopics), methods (study design and sub design) and citations within the literature. Design/methodology/approach - To fulfil this aim, 291 articles in peer-reviewed journals published between 2000 and 2019 were compiled, encoded, categorized and analysed based on semi-systematic literature review principles. Findings - It is concluded that studies on the macroeconomic context are ahead of the microeconomic context, and that the role of tourism on economic growth is the mostly studied and cited subject. Furthermore, these studies are dominantly carried out by authors from the department of EAS. Similarly, quantitatively designed studies have three times more representation than qualitatively and conceptually designed studies. Within that, causality analysis, panel data and multiple approaches are generally adopted for quantitative studies, while tables are chosen as the leading method within qualitative ones. Discussion – All these findings imply that studies macroeconomics, conceptually designed and carried out by authors from EAS are more likely to be cited. https://www.isarder.org/index.php/isarder/article/view/1345Bibliometric analysisLiterature reviewTourism economicsTourism academic community
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yakup Kemal Özekici
spellingShingle Yakup Kemal Özekici
A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi
Bibliometric analysis
Literature review
Tourism economics
Tourism academic community
author_facet Yakup Kemal Özekici
author_sort Yakup Kemal Özekici
title A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_short A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_full A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_fullStr A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_full_unstemmed A Bibliometric Profile of the Tourism-Economics Sub-Field in Turkish Academic Community
title_sort bibliometric profile of the tourism-economics sub-field in turkish academic community
publisher Isarder
series İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi
issn 1309-0712
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Purpose - The aim of the study is to reveal the main characteristics of the domestic tourism-economics literature, as well as to compare the contributions made by the tourism, economics and administrative science (EAS) academia. The purpose is to identify the most distinctive aspects, more specifically, subjects (subdivision of economics, main topics, subtopics), methods (study design and sub design) and citations within the literature. Design/methodology/approach - To fulfil this aim, 291 articles in peer-reviewed journals published between 2000 and 2019 were compiled, encoded, categorized and analysed based on semi-systematic literature review principles. Findings - It is concluded that studies on the macroeconomic context are ahead of the microeconomic context, and that the role of tourism on economic growth is the mostly studied and cited subject. Furthermore, these studies are dominantly carried out by authors from the department of EAS. Similarly, quantitatively designed studies have three times more representation than qualitatively and conceptually designed studies. Within that, causality analysis, panel data and multiple approaches are generally adopted for quantitative studies, while tables are chosen as the leading method within qualitative ones. Discussion – All these findings imply that studies macroeconomics, conceptually designed and carried out by authors from EAS are more likely to be cited.
topic Bibliometric analysis
Literature review
Tourism economics
Tourism academic community
url https://www.isarder.org/index.php/isarder/article/view/1345
work_keys_str_mv AT yakupkemalozekici abibliometricprofileofthetourismeconomicssubfieldinturkishacademiccommunity
AT yakupkemalozekici bibliometricprofileofthetourismeconomicssubfieldinturkishacademiccommunity
_version_ 1721361990654361600