Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking
At first glance, the compatibility of social theory and resilience thinking is not entirely evident, in part because the ontology of the former is rooted in social interactions among human beings rather than ecological process. Despite this difference, resilience thinking engages with particular asp...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2014-09-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art28/ |
id |
doaj-faa89650b7864a979605c78144cc8488 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-faa89650b7864a979605c78144cc84882020-11-24T21:38:00ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872014-09-011932810.5751/ES-06805-1903286805Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinkingAngga Dwiartama0Christopher Rosin1Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago, New ZealandCentre for Sustainability, University of Otago, New ZealandAt first glance, the compatibility of social theory and resilience thinking is not entirely evident, in part because the ontology of the former is rooted in social interactions among human beings rather than ecological process. Despite this difference, resilience thinking engages with particular aspects of social organization that have generated intense debates within social science, namely the role of humans as integral elements of social-ecological systems and the processes through which given social structures (including material relations) are either maintained or transformed. Among social theoretical approaches, Actor-Network Theory (ANT) is noted for its distinctive approach to these aspects. ANT proposes that human and nonhuman components (both referred to as actants) have the same capacity to influence the development of social-ecological systems (represented as actor-networks) by enacting relations and enrolling other actors. We explore the notion of agency that is employed in resilience thinking and ANT in order to extend our understandings of human-environment relationships through complementary insights from each approach. The discussion is illustrated by reference to ongoing assessment of resilience as it is experienced and expressed in two distinctive agricultural production systems: Indonesian rice and New Zealand kiwifruit. We conclude by establishing the potential for ANT to provide more profound theoretical conceptualizations of agency, both human and nonhuman, in analyses of social ecological systems.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art28/actor-networkkiwifruitnonhuman agencyrelationalityrice |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Angga Dwiartama Christopher Rosin |
spellingShingle |
Angga Dwiartama Christopher Rosin Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking Ecology and Society actor-network kiwifruit nonhuman agency relationality rice |
author_facet |
Angga Dwiartama Christopher Rosin |
author_sort |
Angga Dwiartama |
title |
Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking |
title_short |
Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking |
title_full |
Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking |
title_fullStr |
Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking |
title_sort |
exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of actor-network theory (ant) and resilience thinking |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
series |
Ecology and Society |
issn |
1708-3087 |
publishDate |
2014-09-01 |
description |
At first glance, the compatibility of social theory and resilience thinking is not entirely evident, in part because the ontology of the former is rooted in social interactions among human beings rather than ecological process. Despite this difference, resilience thinking engages with particular aspects of social organization that have generated intense debates within social science, namely the role of humans as integral elements of social-ecological systems and the processes through which given social structures (including material relations) are either maintained or transformed. Among social theoretical approaches, Actor-Network Theory (ANT) is noted for its distinctive approach to these aspects. ANT proposes that human and nonhuman components (both referred to as actants) have the same capacity to influence the development of social-ecological systems (represented as actor-networks) by enacting relations and enrolling other actors. We explore the notion of agency that is employed in resilience thinking and ANT in order to extend our understandings of human-environment relationships through complementary insights from each approach. The discussion is illustrated by reference to ongoing assessment of resilience as it is experienced and expressed in two distinctive agricultural production systems: Indonesian rice and New Zealand kiwifruit. We conclude by establishing the potential for ANT to provide more profound theoretical conceptualizations of agency, both human and nonhuman, in analyses of social ecological systems. |
topic |
actor-network kiwifruit nonhuman agency relationality rice |
url |
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art28/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anggadwiartama exploringagencybeyondhumansthecompatibilityofactornetworktheoryantandresiliencethinking AT christopherrosin exploringagencybeyondhumansthecompatibilityofactornetworktheoryantandresiliencethinking |
_version_ |
1716686987432296448 |