Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking

At first glance, the compatibility of social theory and resilience thinking is not entirely evident, in part because the ontology of the former is rooted in social interactions among human beings rather than ecological process. Despite this difference, resilience thinking engages with particular asp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angga Dwiartama, Christopher Rosin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2014-09-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art28/
id doaj-faa89650b7864a979605c78144cc8488
record_format Article
spelling doaj-faa89650b7864a979605c78144cc84882020-11-24T21:38:00ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872014-09-011932810.5751/ES-06805-1903286805Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinkingAngga Dwiartama0Christopher Rosin1Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago, New ZealandCentre for Sustainability, University of Otago, New ZealandAt first glance, the compatibility of social theory and resilience thinking is not entirely evident, in part because the ontology of the former is rooted in social interactions among human beings rather than ecological process. Despite this difference, resilience thinking engages with particular aspects of social organization that have generated intense debates within social science, namely the role of humans as integral elements of social-ecological systems and the processes through which given social structures (including material relations) are either maintained or transformed. Among social theoretical approaches, Actor-Network Theory (ANT) is noted for its distinctive approach to these aspects. ANT proposes that human and nonhuman components (both referred to as actants) have the same capacity to influence the development of social-ecological systems (represented as actor-networks) by enacting relations and enrolling other actors. We explore the notion of agency that is employed in resilience thinking and ANT in order to extend our understandings of human-environment relationships through complementary insights from each approach. The discussion is illustrated by reference to ongoing assessment of resilience as it is experienced and expressed in two distinctive agricultural production systems: Indonesian rice and New Zealand kiwifruit. We conclude by establishing the potential for ANT to provide more profound theoretical conceptualizations of agency, both human and nonhuman, in analyses of social ecological systems.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art28/actor-networkkiwifruitnonhuman agencyrelationalityrice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Angga Dwiartama
Christopher Rosin
spellingShingle Angga Dwiartama
Christopher Rosin
Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking
Ecology and Society
actor-network
kiwifruit
nonhuman agency
relationality
rice
author_facet Angga Dwiartama
Christopher Rosin
author_sort Angga Dwiartama
title Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking
title_short Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking
title_full Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking
title_fullStr Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking
title_full_unstemmed Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking
title_sort exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of actor-network theory (ant) and resilience thinking
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2014-09-01
description At first glance, the compatibility of social theory and resilience thinking is not entirely evident, in part because the ontology of the former is rooted in social interactions among human beings rather than ecological process. Despite this difference, resilience thinking engages with particular aspects of social organization that have generated intense debates within social science, namely the role of humans as integral elements of social-ecological systems and the processes through which given social structures (including material relations) are either maintained or transformed. Among social theoretical approaches, Actor-Network Theory (ANT) is noted for its distinctive approach to these aspects. ANT proposes that human and nonhuman components (both referred to as actants) have the same capacity to influence the development of social-ecological systems (represented as actor-networks) by enacting relations and enrolling other actors. We explore the notion of agency that is employed in resilience thinking and ANT in order to extend our understandings of human-environment relationships through complementary insights from each approach. The discussion is illustrated by reference to ongoing assessment of resilience as it is experienced and expressed in two distinctive agricultural production systems: Indonesian rice and New Zealand kiwifruit. We conclude by establishing the potential for ANT to provide more profound theoretical conceptualizations of agency, both human and nonhuman, in analyses of social ecological systems.
topic actor-network
kiwifruit
nonhuman agency
relationality
rice
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art28/
work_keys_str_mv AT anggadwiartama exploringagencybeyondhumansthecompatibilityofactornetworktheoryantandresiliencethinking
AT christopherrosin exploringagencybeyondhumansthecompatibilityofactornetworktheoryantandresiliencethinking
_version_ 1716686987432296448