Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.

When observing a talking face, it has often been argued that visual speech to the left and right of fixation may produce differences in performance due to divided projections to the two cerebral hemispheres. However, while it seems likely that such a division in hemispheric projections exists for ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy R Jordan, Mercedes Sheen, Lily Abedipour, Kevin B Paterson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4102446?pdf=render
id doaj-fa9bee2e98ee46aaaa960bb179bf5f9c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa9bee2e98ee46aaaa960bb179bf5f9c2020-11-24T22:25:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0197e9827310.1371/journal.pone.0098273Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.Timothy R JordanMercedes SheenLily AbedipourKevin B PatersonWhen observing a talking face, it has often been argued that visual speech to the left and right of fixation may produce differences in performance due to divided projections to the two cerebral hemispheres. However, while it seems likely that such a division in hemispheric projections exists for areas away from fixation, the nature and existence of a functional division in visual speech perception at the foveal midline remains to be determined. We investigated this issue by presenting visual speech in matched hemiface displays to the left and right of a central fixation point, either exactly abutting the foveal midline or else located away from the midline in extrafoveal vision. The location of displays relative to the foveal midline was controlled precisely using an automated, gaze-contingent eye-tracking procedure. Visual speech perception showed a clear right hemifield advantage when presented in extrafoveal locations but no hemifield advantage (left or right) when presented abutting the foveal midline. Thus, while visual speech observed in extrafoveal vision appears to benefit from unilateral projections to left-hemisphere processes, no evidence was obtained to indicate that a functional division exists when visual speech is observed around the point of fixation. Implications of these findings for understanding visual speech perception and the nature of functional divisions in hemispheric projection are discussed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4102446?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Timothy R Jordan
Mercedes Sheen
Lily Abedipour
Kevin B Paterson
spellingShingle Timothy R Jordan
Mercedes Sheen
Lily Abedipour
Kevin B Paterson
Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Timothy R Jordan
Mercedes Sheen
Lily Abedipour
Kevin B Paterson
author_sort Timothy R Jordan
title Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
title_short Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
title_full Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
title_fullStr Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
title_full_unstemmed Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
title_sort visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description When observing a talking face, it has often been argued that visual speech to the left and right of fixation may produce differences in performance due to divided projections to the two cerebral hemispheres. However, while it seems likely that such a division in hemispheric projections exists for areas away from fixation, the nature and existence of a functional division in visual speech perception at the foveal midline remains to be determined. We investigated this issue by presenting visual speech in matched hemiface displays to the left and right of a central fixation point, either exactly abutting the foveal midline or else located away from the midline in extrafoveal vision. The location of displays relative to the foveal midline was controlled precisely using an automated, gaze-contingent eye-tracking procedure. Visual speech perception showed a clear right hemifield advantage when presented in extrafoveal locations but no hemifield advantage (left or right) when presented abutting the foveal midline. Thus, while visual speech observed in extrafoveal vision appears to benefit from unilateral projections to left-hemisphere processes, no evidence was obtained to indicate that a functional division exists when visual speech is observed around the point of fixation. Implications of these findings for understanding visual speech perception and the nature of functional divisions in hemispheric projection are discussed.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4102446?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT timothyrjordan visualspeechperceptioninfovealandextrafovealvisionfurtherimplicationsfordivisionsinhemisphericprojections
AT mercedessheen visualspeechperceptioninfovealandextrafovealvisionfurtherimplicationsfordivisionsinhemisphericprojections
AT lilyabedipour visualspeechperceptioninfovealandextrafovealvisionfurtherimplicationsfordivisionsinhemisphericprojections
AT kevinbpaterson visualspeechperceptioninfovealandextrafovealvisionfurtherimplicationsfordivisionsinhemisphericprojections
_version_ 1725755450524172288