Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia

<p>Direct local leader elections (Pilkada) had replaced indirect local elections. It based on the spirit of people empowerment to participate choosing local leaders more democratic. Responsiveness is an important element besides participation which represent local democracy. These two variable...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Suyatno Suyatno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang 2016-07-01
Series:Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpi/article/view/6586
id doaj-fa879dc088e34ac0a6f6b7c08001f615
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa879dc088e34ac0a6f6b7c08001f6152021-01-02T09:26:43ZengPolitical Science Program, Universitas Negeri SemarangPolitik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review2477-80602503-44562016-07-011221223010.15294/jpi.v1i2.65864664Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di IndonesiaSuyatno Suyatno0Universitas Kanjuruhan Universitas Airlangga<p>Direct local leader elections (Pilkada) had replaced indirect local elections. It based on the spirit of people empowerment to participate choosing local leaders more democratic. Responsiveness is an important element besides participation which represent local democracy. These two variables will decide the local elections that can enhance the quality of local democracy. This paper uses qualitative methodology to analyze the data of participation and responsiveness of Pilkada as an important variables in local democracy. People participation in Pilkada is not as high as the participation in New Order elections. Their participation are more substantive because accompanied assessment of the level of responsiveness of a local leader. Incumbent successful running of local responsiveness will get continued success as the next local elections victory. In contrast, incumbent who failed in the implementation of responsiveness will obtain defeat. Victory and defeat incumbent in the election can be stated that the relevance of participation and responsiveness become very important in the local democratic process as a whole.</p>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpi/article/view/6586PilkadaParticipationResponsivenessLocal Democracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suyatno Suyatno
spellingShingle Suyatno Suyatno
Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia
Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review
Pilkada
Participation
Responsiveness
Local Democracy
author_facet Suyatno Suyatno
author_sort Suyatno Suyatno
title Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia
title_short Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia
title_full Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia
title_fullStr Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia
title_sort pemilihan kepala daerah (pilkada) dan tantangan demokrasi lokal di indonesia
publisher Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang
series Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review
issn 2477-8060
2503-4456
publishDate 2016-07-01
description <p>Direct local leader elections (Pilkada) had replaced indirect local elections. It based on the spirit of people empowerment to participate choosing local leaders more democratic. Responsiveness is an important element besides participation which represent local democracy. These two variables will decide the local elections that can enhance the quality of local democracy. This paper uses qualitative methodology to analyze the data of participation and responsiveness of Pilkada as an important variables in local democracy. People participation in Pilkada is not as high as the participation in New Order elections. Their participation are more substantive because accompanied assessment of the level of responsiveness of a local leader. Incumbent successful running of local responsiveness will get continued success as the next local elections victory. In contrast, incumbent who failed in the implementation of responsiveness will obtain defeat. Victory and defeat incumbent in the election can be stated that the relevance of participation and responsiveness become very important in the local democratic process as a whole.</p>
topic Pilkada
Participation
Responsiveness
Local Democracy
url https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpi/article/view/6586
work_keys_str_mv AT suyatnosuyatno pemilihankepaladaerahpilkadadantantangandemokrasilokaldiindonesia
_version_ 1724356106845683712