Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment
Research suggests that consumers often mishandle food in the home based on survey and observation studies. There is a need for a standardized tool for researchers to objectively evaluate the prevalence and identify the nature of food safety risks in the domestic environment. An audit tool was develo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Foods |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/2/4/572 |
id |
doaj-fa840a47cad442c8835359cd3768dde1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fa840a47cad442c8835359cd3768dde12020-11-24T21:22:51ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582013-12-012457258410.3390/foods2040572foods2040572Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic EnvironmentPatricia Borrusso0Jennifer J. Quinlan1Department of Nutrition Sciences, Drexel University, 1505 Race St., Mail Stop 1030, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USADepartment of Nutrition Sciences, Drexel University, 1505 Race St., Mail Stop 1030, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USAResearch suggests that consumers often mishandle food in the home based on survey and observation studies. There is a need for a standardized tool for researchers to objectively evaluate the prevalence and identify the nature of food safety risks in the domestic environment. An audit tool was developed to measure compliance with recommended sanitation, refrigeration and food storage conditions in the domestic kitchen. The tool was piloted by four researchers who independently completed the inspection in 22 homes. Audit tool questions were evaluated for reliability using the κ statistic. Questions that were not sufficiently reliable (κ < 0.5) or did not provide direct evidence of risk were revised or eliminated from the final tool. Piloting the audit tool found good reliability among 18 questions, 6 questions were revised and 28 eliminated, resulting in a final 24 question tool. The audit tool was able to identify potential food safety risks, including evidence of pest infestation (27%), incorrect refrigeration temperature (73%), and lack of hot water (>43 °C, 32%). The audit tool developed here provides an objective measure for researchers to observe and record the most prevalent food safety risks in consumer’s kitchens and potentially compare risks among consumers of different demographics.http://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/2/4/572food safetyrisk evaluationconsumer behaviorkitchenhomedomestic environmentobservationreliabilityκ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Patricia Borrusso Jennifer J. Quinlan |
spellingShingle |
Patricia Borrusso Jennifer J. Quinlan Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment Foods food safety risk evaluation consumer behavior kitchen home domestic environment observation reliability κ |
author_facet |
Patricia Borrusso Jennifer J. Quinlan |
author_sort |
Patricia Borrusso |
title |
Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment |
title_short |
Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment |
title_full |
Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment |
title_fullStr |
Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment |
title_sort |
development and piloting of a food safety audit tool for the domestic environment |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Foods |
issn |
2304-8158 |
publishDate |
2013-12-01 |
description |
Research suggests that consumers often mishandle food in the home based on survey and observation studies. There is a need for a standardized tool for researchers to objectively evaluate the prevalence and identify the nature of food safety risks in the domestic environment. An audit tool was developed to measure compliance with recommended sanitation, refrigeration and food storage conditions in the domestic kitchen. The tool was piloted by four researchers who independently completed the inspection in 22 homes. Audit tool questions were evaluated for reliability using the κ statistic. Questions that were not sufficiently reliable (κ < 0.5) or did not provide direct evidence of risk were revised or eliminated from the final tool. Piloting the audit tool found good reliability among 18 questions, 6 questions were revised and 28 eliminated, resulting in a final 24 question tool. The audit tool was able to identify potential food safety risks, including evidence of pest infestation (27%), incorrect refrigeration temperature (73%), and lack of hot water (>43 °C, 32%). The audit tool developed here provides an objective measure for researchers to observe and record the most prevalent food safety risks in consumer’s kitchens and potentially compare risks among consumers of different demographics. |
topic |
food safety risk evaluation consumer behavior kitchen home domestic environment observation reliability κ |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/2/4/572 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT patriciaborrusso developmentandpilotingofafoodsafetyaudittoolforthedomesticenvironment AT jenniferjquinlan developmentandpilotingofafoodsafetyaudittoolforthedomesticenvironment |
_version_ |
1725994379701649408 |