Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment

Research suggests that consumers often mishandle food in the home based on survey and observation studies. There is a need for a standardized tool for researchers to objectively evaluate the prevalence and identify the nature of food safety risks in the domestic environment. An audit tool was develo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patricia Borrusso, Jennifer J. Quinlan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-12-01
Series:Foods
Subjects:
κ
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/2/4/572
id doaj-fa840a47cad442c8835359cd3768dde1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa840a47cad442c8835359cd3768dde12020-11-24T21:22:51ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582013-12-012457258410.3390/foods2040572foods2040572Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic EnvironmentPatricia Borrusso0Jennifer J. Quinlan1Department of Nutrition Sciences, Drexel University, 1505 Race St., Mail Stop 1030, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USADepartment of Nutrition Sciences, Drexel University, 1505 Race St., Mail Stop 1030, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USAResearch suggests that consumers often mishandle food in the home based on survey and observation studies. There is a need for a standardized tool for researchers to objectively evaluate the prevalence and identify the nature of food safety risks in the domestic environment. An audit tool was developed to measure compliance with recommended sanitation, refrigeration and food storage conditions in the domestic kitchen. The tool was piloted by four researchers who independently completed the inspection in 22 homes. Audit tool questions were evaluated for reliability using the κ statistic. Questions that were not sufficiently reliable (κ < 0.5) or did not provide direct evidence of risk were revised or eliminated from the final tool. Piloting the audit tool found good reliability among 18 questions, 6 questions were revised and 28 eliminated, resulting in a final 24 question tool. The audit tool was able to identify potential food safety risks, including evidence of pest infestation (27%), incorrect refrigeration temperature (73%), and lack of hot water (>43 °C, 32%). The audit tool developed here provides an objective measure for researchers to observe and record the most prevalent food safety risks in consumer’s kitchens and potentially compare risks among consumers of different demographics.http://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/2/4/572food safetyrisk evaluationconsumer behaviorkitchenhomedomestic environmentobservationreliabilityκ
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patricia Borrusso
Jennifer J. Quinlan
spellingShingle Patricia Borrusso
Jennifer J. Quinlan
Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment
Foods
food safety
risk evaluation
consumer behavior
kitchen
home
domestic environment
observation
reliability
κ
author_facet Patricia Borrusso
Jennifer J. Quinlan
author_sort Patricia Borrusso
title Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment
title_short Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment
title_full Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment
title_fullStr Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment
title_full_unstemmed Development and Piloting of a Food Safety Audit Tool for the Domestic Environment
title_sort development and piloting of a food safety audit tool for the domestic environment
publisher MDPI AG
series Foods
issn 2304-8158
publishDate 2013-12-01
description Research suggests that consumers often mishandle food in the home based on survey and observation studies. There is a need for a standardized tool for researchers to objectively evaluate the prevalence and identify the nature of food safety risks in the domestic environment. An audit tool was developed to measure compliance with recommended sanitation, refrigeration and food storage conditions in the domestic kitchen. The tool was piloted by four researchers who independently completed the inspection in 22 homes. Audit tool questions were evaluated for reliability using the κ statistic. Questions that were not sufficiently reliable (κ < 0.5) or did not provide direct evidence of risk were revised or eliminated from the final tool. Piloting the audit tool found good reliability among 18 questions, 6 questions were revised and 28 eliminated, resulting in a final 24 question tool. The audit tool was able to identify potential food safety risks, including evidence of pest infestation (27%), incorrect refrigeration temperature (73%), and lack of hot water (>43 °C, 32%). The audit tool developed here provides an objective measure for researchers to observe and record the most prevalent food safety risks in consumer’s kitchens and potentially compare risks among consumers of different demographics.
topic food safety
risk evaluation
consumer behavior
kitchen
home
domestic environment
observation
reliability
κ
url http://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/2/4/572
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciaborrusso developmentandpilotingofafoodsafetyaudittoolforthedomesticenvironment
AT jenniferjquinlan developmentandpilotingofafoodsafetyaudittoolforthedomesticenvironment
_version_ 1725994379701649408