Cultural memory and paradigms in the study of the past: philosophy, history, cultural studies

The study deals with the fundamental differences in understanding the past in the philosophy of history, in classical historical science, as well as in memory studies. The authors represent the features of the formation of a non-classical methodological paradigm in the interpretation of history by A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mareeva Elena, Vorobyova Anna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/13/shsconf_appsconf2019_03016.pdf
id doaj-fa4564ee83f9416a8f914bd6d0ec018e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa4564ee83f9416a8f914bd6d0ec018e2021-02-02T05:42:06ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242019-01-01720301610.1051/shsconf/20197203016shsconf_appsconf2019_03016Cultural memory and paradigms in the study of the past: philosophy, history, cultural studiesMareeva Elena0Vorobyova Anna1Moscow State Institute of CultureBelgorod National Research UniversityThe study deals with the fundamental differences in understanding the past in the philosophy of history, in classical historical science, as well as in memory studies. The authors represent the features of the formation of a non-classical methodological paradigm in the interpretation of history by A. Warburg, in the German “historical school”, in the neo-Kantians of the Baden school and in the Annals school. The non-classical methodology in the study of the past is presented in the reversion from conscious personal choice to the mechanisms of the unconscious rallying of the collective in the concepts of cultural memory by M. Halbwachs and J. Assmann. The peculiarity of “mentality”, “identity” and “cultural memory” as concepts of modern non-classical discourse is revealed. It is concluded that the construction of mythological images of the past is a novation of the era of “managed democracy”, which carries elements of authoritarianism. The past, as demonstrated by memory studies, has once again become a myth that the media make good use of.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/13/shsconf_appsconf2019_03016.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mareeva Elena
Vorobyova Anna
spellingShingle Mareeva Elena
Vorobyova Anna
Cultural memory and paradigms in the study of the past: philosophy, history, cultural studies
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Mareeva Elena
Vorobyova Anna
author_sort Mareeva Elena
title Cultural memory and paradigms in the study of the past: philosophy, history, cultural studies
title_short Cultural memory and paradigms in the study of the past: philosophy, history, cultural studies
title_full Cultural memory and paradigms in the study of the past: philosophy, history, cultural studies
title_fullStr Cultural memory and paradigms in the study of the past: philosophy, history, cultural studies
title_full_unstemmed Cultural memory and paradigms in the study of the past: philosophy, history, cultural studies
title_sort cultural memory and paradigms in the study of the past: philosophy, history, cultural studies
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The study deals with the fundamental differences in understanding the past in the philosophy of history, in classical historical science, as well as in memory studies. The authors represent the features of the formation of a non-classical methodological paradigm in the interpretation of history by A. Warburg, in the German “historical school”, in the neo-Kantians of the Baden school and in the Annals school. The non-classical methodology in the study of the past is presented in the reversion from conscious personal choice to the mechanisms of the unconscious rallying of the collective in the concepts of cultural memory by M. Halbwachs and J. Assmann. The peculiarity of “mentality”, “identity” and “cultural memory” as concepts of modern non-classical discourse is revealed. It is concluded that the construction of mythological images of the past is a novation of the era of “managed democracy”, which carries elements of authoritarianism. The past, as demonstrated by memory studies, has once again become a myth that the media make good use of.
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/13/shsconf_appsconf2019_03016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mareevaelena culturalmemoryandparadigmsinthestudyofthepastphilosophyhistoryculturalstudies
AT vorobyovaanna culturalmemoryandparadigmsinthestudyofthepastphilosophyhistoryculturalstudies
_version_ 1724303004813754368