Do we really know the prevalence of accomodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions?
Purpose: To determine the scientific evidence about the prevalence of accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular anomalies. Methods: We carried out a systematic review of studies published between 1986 and 2009, analysing the MEDLINE, CINAHL, FRANCIS and PsycINFO databases. We considered admitting th...
Main Authors: | Pilar Cacho-Martínez, Ángel García-Muñoz, María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2010-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Optometry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429610700285 |
Similar Items
-
Is there any evidence for the validity of diagnostic criteria used for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions?
by: Pilar Cacho-Martínez, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Symptomatology associated with accommodative and binocular vision anomalies
by: Ángel García-Muñoz, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01) -
Clinical profile of nonstrabismic binocular vision anomalies in patients with asthenopia in North-East India
by: Damaris Magdalene, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Comparison of Binocular Vision Parameters Pre- and Post-EPILASIK Laser Vision Correction Surgery for Myopia in a Pilot Study – Can Vision Therapy Augment Refractive Results?
by: Radhika Natarajan, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Small temporal asynchronies between the two eyes in binocular reading: Crosslinguistic data and the implications for ocular prevalence
by: Kreiner, H., et al.
Published: (2021)