The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research
This paper presents the results of a transdisciplinary research conducted by scholars working in the humanities and experimental psychologists in order to find an interface between the needs of a qualitative approach (mainly based on the evaluation of stylistic features) and those of a quantitative...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Università degli Studi di Milano
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Enthymema |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/enthymema/article/view/14387 |
id |
doaj-fa2d497295344745ab379e3535a5eaf9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fa2d497295344745ab379e3535a5eaf92021-02-03T08:52:48ZdeuUniversità degli Studi di MilanoEnthymema2037-24262020-12-012610.13130/2037-2426/14387The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary researchGrazia PulvirentiRenata GambinoTeresa SylvesterArthur M. JacobsJana Lüdtke This paper presents the results of a transdisciplinary research conducted by scholars working in the humanities and experimental psychologists in order to find an interface between the needs of a qualitative approach (mainly based on the evaluation of stylistic features) and those of a quantitative analysis, in order to find useful features for testing different reading behaviors and for new hermeneutical enquiries. The results of our research, which was conducted in two Labs (Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion at the FU Berlin and the NewHums – Neurocognitive and Human Studies at the University of Catania), consistently differ from previous ones, as they focus on the whole multi-layered foregrounded texture of a poem and try to evaluate predictable differences in reading, re-reading behaviour and meaning-making processes. We present the FAM, targeting foregrounding elements in three main categories: the phonological, morpho-syntactic, and rhetoric. To identify those elements, four different text levels were taken into account, the sublexical level of phonemes and syllables, the lexical level of single words, the interlexical level of word combinations across longer distance (e.g. two lines), and the supralexical level of whole stanzas or an entire poem. In contrast to previous quantitative analyses on short, isolated sentences and texts, mostly expository in nature (‘textoids’), or on single words or segments, the text is considered as a whole, marked by density fields that work as milestones along a reading route. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/enthymema/article/view/14387Qualitative and quantitative research; Literary criticism; Experimental psycholo-gy; Foregrounding; Density fields |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Grazia Pulvirenti Renata Gambino Teresa Sylvester Arthur M. Jacobs Jana Lüdtke |
spellingShingle |
Grazia Pulvirenti Renata Gambino Teresa Sylvester Arthur M. Jacobs Jana Lüdtke The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research Enthymema Qualitative and quantitative research; Literary criticism; Experimental psycholo-gy; Foregrounding; Density fields |
author_facet |
Grazia Pulvirenti Renata Gambino Teresa Sylvester Arthur M. Jacobs Jana Lüdtke |
author_sort |
Grazia Pulvirenti |
title |
The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research |
title_short |
The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research |
title_full |
The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research |
title_fullStr |
The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research |
title_sort |
foregrounding assessment matrix: an interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research |
publisher |
Università degli Studi di Milano |
series |
Enthymema |
issn |
2037-2426 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
This paper presents the results of a transdisciplinary research conducted by scholars working in the humanities and experimental psychologists in order to find an interface between the needs of a qualitative approach (mainly based on the evaluation of stylistic features) and those of a quantitative analysis, in order to find useful features for testing different reading behaviors and for new hermeneutical enquiries. The results of our research, which was conducted in two Labs (Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion at the FU Berlin and the NewHums – Neurocognitive and Human Studies at the University of Catania), consistently differ from previous ones, as they focus on the whole multi-layered foregrounded texture of a poem and try to evaluate predictable differences in reading, re-reading behaviour and meaning-making processes.
We present the FAM, targeting foregrounding elements in three main categories: the phonological, morpho-syntactic, and rhetoric. To identify those elements, four different text levels were taken into account, the sublexical level of phonemes and syllables, the lexical level of single words, the interlexical level of word combinations across longer distance (e.g. two lines), and the supralexical level of whole stanzas or an entire poem. In contrast to previous quantitative analyses on short, isolated sentences and texts, mostly expository in nature (‘textoids’), or on single words or segments, the text is considered as a whole, marked by density fields that work as milestones along a reading route.
|
topic |
Qualitative and quantitative research; Literary criticism; Experimental psycholo-gy; Foregrounding; Density fields |
url |
https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/enthymema/article/view/14387 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT graziapulvirenti theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch AT renatagambino theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch AT teresasylvester theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch AT arthurmjacobs theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch AT janaludtke theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch AT graziapulvirenti foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch AT renatagambino foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch AT teresasylvester foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch AT arthurmjacobs foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch AT janaludtke foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch |
_version_ |
1724287430436061184 |