The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research

This paper presents the results of a transdisciplinary research conducted by scholars working in the humanities and experimental psychologists in order to find an interface between the needs of a qualitative approach (mainly based on the evaluation of stylistic features) and those of a quantitative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grazia Pulvirenti, Renata Gambino, Teresa Sylvester, Arthur M. Jacobs, Jana Lüdtke
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Università degli Studi di Milano 2020-12-01
Series:Enthymema
Subjects:
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/enthymema/article/view/14387
id doaj-fa2d497295344745ab379e3535a5eaf9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa2d497295344745ab379e3535a5eaf92021-02-03T08:52:48ZdeuUniversità degli Studi di MilanoEnthymema2037-24262020-12-012610.13130/2037-2426/14387The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary researchGrazia PulvirentiRenata GambinoTeresa SylvesterArthur M. JacobsJana Lüdtke This paper presents the results of a transdisciplinary research conducted by scholars working in the humanities and experimental psychologists in order to find an interface between the needs of a qualitative approach (mainly based on the evaluation of stylistic features) and those of a quantitative analysis, in order to find useful features for testing different reading behaviors and for new hermeneutical enquiries. The results of our research, which was conducted in two Labs (Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion at the FU Berlin and the NewHums – Neurocognitive and Human Studies at the University of Catania), consistently differ from previous ones, as they focus on the whole multi-layered foregrounded texture of a poem and try to evaluate predictable differences in reading, re-reading behaviour and meaning-making processes. We present the FAM, targeting foregrounding elements in three main categories: the phonological, morpho-syntactic, and rhetoric. To identify those elements, four different text levels were taken into account, the sublexical level of phonemes and syllables, the lexical level of single words, the interlexical level of word combinations across longer distance (e.g. two lines), and the supralexical level of whole stanzas or an entire poem. In contrast to previous quantitative analyses on short, isolated sentences and texts, mostly expository in nature (‘textoids’), or on single words or segments, the text is considered as a whole, marked by density fields that work as milestones along a reading route. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/enthymema/article/view/14387Qualitative and quantitative research; Literary criticism; Experimental psycholo-gy; Foregrounding; Density fields
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Grazia Pulvirenti
Renata Gambino
Teresa Sylvester
Arthur M. Jacobs
Jana Lüdtke
spellingShingle Grazia Pulvirenti
Renata Gambino
Teresa Sylvester
Arthur M. Jacobs
Jana Lüdtke
The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research
Enthymema
Qualitative and quantitative research; Literary criticism; Experimental psycholo-gy; Foregrounding; Density fields
author_facet Grazia Pulvirenti
Renata Gambino
Teresa Sylvester
Arthur M. Jacobs
Jana Lüdtke
author_sort Grazia Pulvirenti
title The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research
title_short The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research
title_full The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research
title_fullStr The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research
title_full_unstemmed The Foregrounding Assessment Matrix: An interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research
title_sort foregrounding assessment matrix: an interface for qualitative-quantitative interdisciplinary research
publisher Università degli Studi di Milano
series Enthymema
issn 2037-2426
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This paper presents the results of a transdisciplinary research conducted by scholars working in the humanities and experimental psychologists in order to find an interface between the needs of a qualitative approach (mainly based on the evaluation of stylistic features) and those of a quantitative analysis, in order to find useful features for testing different reading behaviors and for new hermeneutical enquiries. The results of our research, which was conducted in two Labs (Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion at the FU Berlin and the NewHums – Neurocognitive and Human Studies at the University of Catania), consistently differ from previous ones, as they focus on the whole multi-layered foregrounded texture of a poem and try to evaluate predictable differences in reading, re-reading behaviour and meaning-making processes. We present the FAM, targeting foregrounding elements in three main categories: the phonological, morpho-syntactic, and rhetoric. To identify those elements, four different text levels were taken into account, the sublexical level of phonemes and syllables, the lexical level of single words, the interlexical level of word combinations across longer distance (e.g. two lines), and the supralexical level of whole stanzas or an entire poem. In contrast to previous quantitative analyses on short, isolated sentences and texts, mostly expository in nature (‘textoids’), or on single words or segments, the text is considered as a whole, marked by density fields that work as milestones along a reading route.
topic Qualitative and quantitative research; Literary criticism; Experimental psycholo-gy; Foregrounding; Density fields
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/enthymema/article/view/14387
work_keys_str_mv AT graziapulvirenti theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
AT renatagambino theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
AT teresasylvester theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
AT arthurmjacobs theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
AT janaludtke theforegroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
AT graziapulvirenti foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
AT renatagambino foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
AT teresasylvester foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
AT arthurmjacobs foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
AT janaludtke foregroundingassessmentmatrixaninterfaceforqualitativequantitativeinterdisciplinaryresearch
_version_ 1724287430436061184