Sustainable Infrastructure Projects: Systemic versus Traditional Delivery Models
Sustainability involves multiple environmental, technical, social and economic factors, and such complex analysis requires systemic solutions. Delivery models are key to achieving system benefits and enhancing sustainable development in infrastructure investments. They define the phases of a project...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6273 |
id |
doaj-fa1811246fb34d06b2c7b805888206b4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fa1811246fb34d06b2c7b805888206b42021-06-30T23:05:18ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-06-01136273627310.3390/su13116273Sustainable Infrastructure Projects: Systemic versus Traditional Delivery ModelsMagnus Hellström0Kim Wikström1Kent Eriksson2Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Åbo, FinlandFaculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Åbo, FinlandSustainable Finance Lab, Center for Construction Efficiency, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, SwedenSustainability involves multiple environmental, technical, social and economic factors, and such complex analysis requires systemic solutions. Delivery models are key to achieving system benefits and enhancing sustainable development in infrastructure investments. They define the phases of a project, incentive structures, risk sharing and the relationships among the actors in it. They are usually developed early in the project and determine the project dynamics and outcomes. We compared traditional delivery models with systemic ones. We identified and illustrated elements that differ between them through two cases. The contribution is an increased understanding of how systemic infrastructure delivery models can adapt to changes in their environment. We also found that sustainability is vastly under-researched in systemic infrastructure delivery, but that its potential to deliver benefits to PPP infrastructures is substantial.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6273delivery modelinfrastructure projectbusiness ecosystemsystem benefitflexibilitysustainability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Magnus Hellström Kim Wikström Kent Eriksson |
spellingShingle |
Magnus Hellström Kim Wikström Kent Eriksson Sustainable Infrastructure Projects: Systemic versus Traditional Delivery Models Sustainability delivery model infrastructure project business ecosystem system benefit flexibility sustainability |
author_facet |
Magnus Hellström Kim Wikström Kent Eriksson |
author_sort |
Magnus Hellström |
title |
Sustainable Infrastructure Projects: Systemic versus Traditional Delivery Models |
title_short |
Sustainable Infrastructure Projects: Systemic versus Traditional Delivery Models |
title_full |
Sustainable Infrastructure Projects: Systemic versus Traditional Delivery Models |
title_fullStr |
Sustainable Infrastructure Projects: Systemic versus Traditional Delivery Models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainable Infrastructure Projects: Systemic versus Traditional Delivery Models |
title_sort |
sustainable infrastructure projects: systemic versus traditional delivery models |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Sustainability involves multiple environmental, technical, social and economic factors, and such complex analysis requires systemic solutions. Delivery models are key to achieving system benefits and enhancing sustainable development in infrastructure investments. They define the phases of a project, incentive structures, risk sharing and the relationships among the actors in it. They are usually developed early in the project and determine the project dynamics and outcomes. We compared traditional delivery models with systemic ones. We identified and illustrated elements that differ between them through two cases. The contribution is an increased understanding of how systemic infrastructure delivery models can adapt to changes in their environment. We also found that sustainability is vastly under-researched in systemic infrastructure delivery, but that its potential to deliver benefits to PPP infrastructures is substantial. |
topic |
delivery model infrastructure project business ecosystem system benefit flexibility sustainability |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6273 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT magnushellstrom sustainableinfrastructureprojectssystemicversustraditionaldeliverymodels AT kimwikstrom sustainableinfrastructureprojectssystemicversustraditionaldeliverymodels AT kenteriksson sustainableinfrastructureprojectssystemicversustraditionaldeliverymodels |
_version_ |
1721352292691607552 |