Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task

Inattentional blindness is a failure to notice an unexpected event when attention is directed elsewhere. The current study examined participants’ awareness of an unexpected object that maintained luminance contrast, switched the luminance once, or repetitively flashed. One hundred twenty participant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dakota B. Palmer, Yusuke Yamani, Taylor L. Bobrow, Nicole D. Karpinsky, Dean J. Krusienski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-01-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518754595
id doaj-fa0f5e1d7e4e41febe1c905a34bcb062
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa0f5e1d7e4e41febe1c905a34bcb0622020-11-25T03:15:28ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952018-01-01910.1177/2041669518754595Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking TaskDakota B. PalmerYusuke YamaniTaylor L. BobrowNicole D. KarpinskyDean J. KrusienskiInattentional blindness is a failure to notice an unexpected event when attention is directed elsewhere. The current study examined participants’ awareness of an unexpected object that maintained luminance contrast, switched the luminance once, or repetitively flashed. One hundred twenty participants performed a dynamic tracking task on a computer monitor for which they were instructed to count the number of movement deflections of an attended set of objects while ignoring other objects. On the critical trial, an unexpected cross that did not change its luminance (control condition), switched its luminance once (switch condition), or repetitively flashed (flash condition) traveled across the stimulus display. Participants noticed the unexpected cross more frequently when the luminance feature matched their attention set than when it did not match. Unexpectedly, however, a proportion of the participants who noticed the cross in the switch and flash conditions were statistically comparable. The results suggest that an unexpected object with even a single luminance change can break inattentional blindness in a multi-object tracking task.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518754595
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dakota B. Palmer
Yusuke Yamani
Taylor L. Bobrow
Nicole D. Karpinsky
Dean J. Krusienski
spellingShingle Dakota B. Palmer
Yusuke Yamani
Taylor L. Bobrow
Nicole D. Karpinsky
Dean J. Krusienski
Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task
i-Perception
author_facet Dakota B. Palmer
Yusuke Yamani
Taylor L. Bobrow
Nicole D. Karpinsky
Dean J. Krusienski
author_sort Dakota B. Palmer
title Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task
title_short Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task
title_full Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task
title_fullStr Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task
title_full_unstemmed Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task
title_sort transient signals and inattentional blindness in a multi-object tracking task
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Inattentional blindness is a failure to notice an unexpected event when attention is directed elsewhere. The current study examined participants’ awareness of an unexpected object that maintained luminance contrast, switched the luminance once, or repetitively flashed. One hundred twenty participants performed a dynamic tracking task on a computer monitor for which they were instructed to count the number of movement deflections of an attended set of objects while ignoring other objects. On the critical trial, an unexpected cross that did not change its luminance (control condition), switched its luminance once (switch condition), or repetitively flashed (flash condition) traveled across the stimulus display. Participants noticed the unexpected cross more frequently when the luminance feature matched their attention set than when it did not match. Unexpectedly, however, a proportion of the participants who noticed the cross in the switch and flash conditions were statistically comparable. The results suggest that an unexpected object with even a single luminance change can break inattentional blindness in a multi-object tracking task.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518754595
work_keys_str_mv AT dakotabpalmer transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask
AT yusukeyamani transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask
AT taylorlbobrow transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask
AT nicoledkarpinsky transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask
AT deanjkrusienski transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask
_version_ 1724639111494500352