Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task
Inattentional blindness is a failure to notice an unexpected event when attention is directed elsewhere. The current study examined participants’ awareness of an unexpected object that maintained luminance contrast, switched the luminance once, or repetitively flashed. One hundred twenty participant...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-01-01
|
Series: | i-Perception |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518754595 |
id |
doaj-fa0f5e1d7e4e41febe1c905a34bcb062 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fa0f5e1d7e4e41febe1c905a34bcb0622020-11-25T03:15:28ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952018-01-01910.1177/2041669518754595Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking TaskDakota B. PalmerYusuke YamaniTaylor L. BobrowNicole D. KarpinskyDean J. KrusienskiInattentional blindness is a failure to notice an unexpected event when attention is directed elsewhere. The current study examined participants’ awareness of an unexpected object that maintained luminance contrast, switched the luminance once, or repetitively flashed. One hundred twenty participants performed a dynamic tracking task on a computer monitor for which they were instructed to count the number of movement deflections of an attended set of objects while ignoring other objects. On the critical trial, an unexpected cross that did not change its luminance (control condition), switched its luminance once (switch condition), or repetitively flashed (flash condition) traveled across the stimulus display. Participants noticed the unexpected cross more frequently when the luminance feature matched their attention set than when it did not match. Unexpectedly, however, a proportion of the participants who noticed the cross in the switch and flash conditions were statistically comparable. The results suggest that an unexpected object with even a single luminance change can break inattentional blindness in a multi-object tracking task.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518754595 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dakota B. Palmer Yusuke Yamani Taylor L. Bobrow Nicole D. Karpinsky Dean J. Krusienski |
spellingShingle |
Dakota B. Palmer Yusuke Yamani Taylor L. Bobrow Nicole D. Karpinsky Dean J. Krusienski Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task i-Perception |
author_facet |
Dakota B. Palmer Yusuke Yamani Taylor L. Bobrow Nicole D. Karpinsky Dean J. Krusienski |
author_sort |
Dakota B. Palmer |
title |
Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task |
title_short |
Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task |
title_full |
Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task |
title_fullStr |
Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task |
title_full_unstemmed |
Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task |
title_sort |
transient signals and inattentional blindness in a multi-object tracking task |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
i-Perception |
issn |
2041-6695 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Inattentional blindness is a failure to notice an unexpected event when attention is directed elsewhere. The current study examined participants’ awareness of an unexpected object that maintained luminance contrast, switched the luminance once, or repetitively flashed. One hundred twenty participants performed a dynamic tracking task on a computer monitor for which they were instructed to count the number of movement deflections of an attended set of objects while ignoring other objects. On the critical trial, an unexpected cross that did not change its luminance (control condition), switched its luminance once (switch condition), or repetitively flashed (flash condition) traveled across the stimulus display. Participants noticed the unexpected cross more frequently when the luminance feature matched their attention set than when it did not match. Unexpectedly, however, a proportion of the participants who noticed the cross in the switch and flash conditions were statistically comparable. The results suggest that an unexpected object with even a single luminance change can break inattentional blindness in a multi-object tracking task. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518754595 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dakotabpalmer transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask AT yusukeyamani transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask AT taylorlbobrow transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask AT nicoledkarpinsky transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask AT deanjkrusienski transientsignalsandinattentionalblindnessinamultiobjecttrackingtask |
_version_ |
1724639111494500352 |