Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers

This article presents results from a research on anti-vaccine speech in 14 of the most relevant YouTube videos showed in 2018 and 2019, considering the amount of views, likes, dislikes, and comments. The study identifies arguments and meanings constructed by the mediators, from the natural perspecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Marcos Pereira Brotas, Márcia Cristina Rocha Costa, Junia Ortiz, Caio Costa Santos, Luisa Massarani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) 2021-03-01
Series:RECIIS
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/2281
id doaj-fa0828072ec8417da3e0a294dbfc7259
record_format Article
spelling doaj-fa0828072ec8417da3e0a294dbfc72592021-05-03T00:10:19ZengInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)RECIIS1981-62782021-03-0115110.29397/reciis.v15i1.22811393Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencersAntonio Marcos Pereira Brotas0Márcia Cristina Rocha Costa1Junia Ortiz2Caio Costa Santos3Luisa Massarani4Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Pesquisa Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BAUniversidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Centro de Artes, Humanidades e Letras. Cachoeira, BAFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Pesquisa Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BAFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Pesquisa Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BAFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Casa de Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJThis article presents results from a research on anti-vaccine speech in 14 of the most relevant YouTube videos showed in 2018 and 2019, considering the amount of views, likes, dislikes, and comments. The study identifies arguments and meanings constructed by the mediators, from the natural perspective, which associates vaccine with the idea of poison, risks and death; and the political perspective, which triggers individual freedoms and power plans for big pharma’s population reduction and profit. At the intersection between the two perspectives, religious aspects make up the frame of the discourses. The qualitative and quantitative analysis points to the need to invest in communication strategies that clarify and deconstruct the disseminated false or distorted information. It also signals the importance of dialogue with an unbelieving public with political, scientific and media institutions, where the threat of punishment by law is no obstacle to vaccine refusal or hesitation.https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/2281desinformaçãoantivacinadiscursoyoutubeinfluenciadores.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonio Marcos Pereira Brotas
Márcia Cristina Rocha Costa
Junia Ortiz
Caio Costa Santos
Luisa Massarani
spellingShingle Antonio Marcos Pereira Brotas
Márcia Cristina Rocha Costa
Junia Ortiz
Caio Costa Santos
Luisa Massarani
Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers
RECIIS
desinformação
antivacina
discurso
youtube
influenciadores.
author_facet Antonio Marcos Pereira Brotas
Márcia Cristina Rocha Costa
Junia Ortiz
Caio Costa Santos
Luisa Massarani
author_sort Antonio Marcos Pereira Brotas
title Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers
title_short Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers
title_full Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers
title_fullStr Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers
title_full_unstemmed Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers
title_sort anti-vaccine discourse on youtube: the mediation of influencers
publisher Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
series RECIIS
issn 1981-6278
publishDate 2021-03-01
description This article presents results from a research on anti-vaccine speech in 14 of the most relevant YouTube videos showed in 2018 and 2019, considering the amount of views, likes, dislikes, and comments. The study identifies arguments and meanings constructed by the mediators, from the natural perspective, which associates vaccine with the idea of poison, risks and death; and the political perspective, which triggers individual freedoms and power plans for big pharma’s population reduction and profit. At the intersection between the two perspectives, religious aspects make up the frame of the discourses. The qualitative and quantitative analysis points to the need to invest in communication strategies that clarify and deconstruct the disseminated false or distorted information. It also signals the importance of dialogue with an unbelieving public with political, scientific and media institutions, where the threat of punishment by law is no obstacle to vaccine refusal or hesitation.
topic desinformação
antivacina
discurso
youtube
influenciadores.
url https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/2281
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniomarcospereirabrotas antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers
AT marciacristinarochacosta antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers
AT juniaortiz antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers
AT caiocostasantos antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers
AT luisamassarani antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers
_version_ 1721486575692414976