Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers
This article presents results from a research on anti-vaccine speech in 14 of the most relevant YouTube videos showed in 2018 and 2019, considering the amount of views, likes, dislikes, and comments. The study identifies arguments and meanings constructed by the mediators, from the natural perspecti...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
2021-03-01
|
Series: | RECIIS |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/2281 |
id |
doaj-fa0828072ec8417da3e0a294dbfc7259 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-fa0828072ec8417da3e0a294dbfc72592021-05-03T00:10:19ZengInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)RECIIS1981-62782021-03-0115110.29397/reciis.v15i1.22811393Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencersAntonio Marcos Pereira Brotas0Márcia Cristina Rocha Costa1Junia Ortiz2Caio Costa Santos3Luisa Massarani4Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Pesquisa Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BAUniversidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Centro de Artes, Humanidades e Letras. Cachoeira, BAFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Pesquisa Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BAFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Pesquisa Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BAFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Casa de Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJThis article presents results from a research on anti-vaccine speech in 14 of the most relevant YouTube videos showed in 2018 and 2019, considering the amount of views, likes, dislikes, and comments. The study identifies arguments and meanings constructed by the mediators, from the natural perspective, which associates vaccine with the idea of poison, risks and death; and the political perspective, which triggers individual freedoms and power plans for big pharma’s population reduction and profit. At the intersection between the two perspectives, religious aspects make up the frame of the discourses. The qualitative and quantitative analysis points to the need to invest in communication strategies that clarify and deconstruct the disseminated false or distorted information. It also signals the importance of dialogue with an unbelieving public with political, scientific and media institutions, where the threat of punishment by law is no obstacle to vaccine refusal or hesitation.https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/2281desinformaçãoantivacinadiscursoyoutubeinfluenciadores. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Antonio Marcos Pereira Brotas Márcia Cristina Rocha Costa Junia Ortiz Caio Costa Santos Luisa Massarani |
spellingShingle |
Antonio Marcos Pereira Brotas Márcia Cristina Rocha Costa Junia Ortiz Caio Costa Santos Luisa Massarani Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers RECIIS desinformação antivacina discurso youtube influenciadores. |
author_facet |
Antonio Marcos Pereira Brotas Márcia Cristina Rocha Costa Junia Ortiz Caio Costa Santos Luisa Massarani |
author_sort |
Antonio Marcos Pereira Brotas |
title |
Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers |
title_short |
Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers |
title_full |
Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers |
title_fullStr |
Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anti-vaccine discourse on YouTube: the mediation of influencers |
title_sort |
anti-vaccine discourse on youtube: the mediation of influencers |
publisher |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) |
series |
RECIIS |
issn |
1981-6278 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
This article presents results from a research on anti-vaccine speech in 14 of the most relevant YouTube videos showed in 2018 and 2019, considering the amount of views, likes, dislikes, and comments. The study identifies arguments and meanings constructed by the mediators, from the natural perspective, which associates vaccine with the idea of poison, risks and death; and the political perspective, which triggers individual freedoms and power plans for big pharma’s population reduction and profit. At the intersection between the two perspectives, religious aspects make up the frame of the discourses. The qualitative and quantitative analysis points to the need to invest in communication strategies that clarify and deconstruct the disseminated false or distorted information. It also signals the importance of dialogue with an unbelieving public with political, scientific and media institutions, where the threat of punishment by law is no obstacle to vaccine refusal or hesitation. |
topic |
desinformação antivacina discurso youtube influenciadores. |
url |
https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/2281 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT antoniomarcospereirabrotas antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers AT marciacristinarochacosta antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers AT juniaortiz antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers AT caiocostasantos antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers AT luisamassarani antivaccinediscourseonyoutubethemediationofinfluencers |
_version_ |
1721486575692414976 |