Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection
Prioritising areas for conservation is hindered by disagreements over ecological targets. Here, Armsworth et al. combine a simulation approach and case study to test if considering economic return on investment aids in prioritisation, and find that its impact on reaching agreements varies greatly.
Main Authors: | Paul R. Armsworth, Heather B. Jackson, Seong-Hoon Cho, Melissa Clark, Joseph E. Fargione, Gwenllian D. Iacona, Taeyoung Kim, Eric R. Larson, Thomas Minney, Nathan A. Sutton |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02399-y |
Similar Items
-
Science priorities for seamounts: research links to conservation and management.
by: Malcolm R Clark, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.
by: Elizabeth R Selig, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Memorandum of agreement, May 23, 1980.
Published: () -
Identification of priority shorebird conservation areas in the Caribbean
by: Jessica R. Cañizares, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Do private conservation activities match science-based conservation priorities?
by: Jonathan R B Fisher, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)