Mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness

Abstract Background Non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes in time-to-event data affects event counts as well as the risk sets, thus, biasing the estimation of hazard ratios. We investigate how imperfect observation of incident events affects the estimation of vaccine effectiveness b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ulrike Baum, Sangita Kulathinal, Kari Auranen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-020-00091-z
id doaj-f9ef90a01bca41e3a82a9c3ff4fa30f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9ef90a01bca41e3a82a9c3ff4fa30f52021-01-17T12:03:53ZengBMCEmerging Themes in Epidemiology1742-76222021-01-0118111010.1186/s12982-020-00091-zMitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectivenessUlrike Baum0Sangita Kulathinal1Kari Auranen2Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and WelfareDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of HelsinkiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of TurkuAbstract Background Non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes in time-to-event data affects event counts as well as the risk sets, thus, biasing the estimation of hazard ratios. We investigate how imperfect observation of incident events affects the estimation of vaccine effectiveness based on hazard ratios. Methods Imperfect time-to-event data contain two classes of events: a portion of the true events of interest; and false-positive events mistakenly recorded as events of interest. We develop an estimation method utilising a weighted partial likelihood and probabilistic deletion of false-positive events and assuming the sensitivity and the false-positive rate are known. The performance of the method is evaluated using simulated and Finnish register data. Results The novel method enables unbiased semiparametric estimation of hazard ratios from imperfect time-to-event data. False-positive rates that are small can be approximated to be zero without inducing bias. The method is robust to misspecification of the sensitivity as long as the ratio of the sensitivity in the vaccinated and the unvaccinated is specified correctly and the cumulative risk of the true event is small. Conclusions The weighted partial likelihood can be used to adjust for outcome measurement errors in the estimation of hazard ratios and effectiveness but requires specifying the sensitivity and the false-positive rate. In absence of exact information about these parameters, the method works as a tool for assessing the potential magnitude of bias given a range of likely parameter values.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-020-00091-zInfluenzaOutcome measurement errorProportional hazards modelSurvival analysisVaccine effectiveness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ulrike Baum
Sangita Kulathinal
Kari Auranen
spellingShingle Ulrike Baum
Sangita Kulathinal
Kari Auranen
Mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
Influenza
Outcome measurement error
Proportional hazards model
Survival analysis
Vaccine effectiveness
author_facet Ulrike Baum
Sangita Kulathinal
Kari Auranen
author_sort Ulrike Baum
title Mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness
title_short Mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness
title_full Mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness
title_fullStr Mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness
title_sort mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness
publisher BMC
series Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
issn 1742-7622
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background Non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes in time-to-event data affects event counts as well as the risk sets, thus, biasing the estimation of hazard ratios. We investigate how imperfect observation of incident events affects the estimation of vaccine effectiveness based on hazard ratios. Methods Imperfect time-to-event data contain two classes of events: a portion of the true events of interest; and false-positive events mistakenly recorded as events of interest. We develop an estimation method utilising a weighted partial likelihood and probabilistic deletion of false-positive events and assuming the sensitivity and the false-positive rate are known. The performance of the method is evaluated using simulated and Finnish register data. Results The novel method enables unbiased semiparametric estimation of hazard ratios from imperfect time-to-event data. False-positive rates that are small can be approximated to be zero without inducing bias. The method is robust to misspecification of the sensitivity as long as the ratio of the sensitivity in the vaccinated and the unvaccinated is specified correctly and the cumulative risk of the true event is small. Conclusions The weighted partial likelihood can be used to adjust for outcome measurement errors in the estimation of hazard ratios and effectiveness but requires specifying the sensitivity and the false-positive rate. In absence of exact information about these parameters, the method works as a tool for assessing the potential magnitude of bias given a range of likely parameter values.
topic Influenza
Outcome measurement error
Proportional hazards model
Survival analysis
Vaccine effectiveness
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-020-00091-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ulrikebaum mitigationofbiasesinestimatinghazardratiosundernonsensitiveandnonspecificobservationofoutcomesapplicationstoinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT sangitakulathinal mitigationofbiasesinestimatinghazardratiosundernonsensitiveandnonspecificobservationofoutcomesapplicationstoinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
AT kariauranen mitigationofbiasesinestimatinghazardratiosundernonsensitiveandnonspecificobservationofoutcomesapplicationstoinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness
_version_ 1724335551565266944