Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century

The article presents the results of the study of should -constructions in the penitentiary instructions of the 19th century. The relevance of the work is due to the fact that the data obtained will complement the understanding of the means of expression of the category of directivity in the period o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. M. Golikov, O. V. Druzhininskaya
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2019-09-01
Series:Научный диалог
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1293
id doaj-f9e6d316bcf44b9b8a2c72bed9ca256a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9e6d316bcf44b9b8a2c72bed9ca256a2021-09-30T08:36:38ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952019-09-010992310.24224/2227-1295-2019-9-9-231289Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> CenturyL. M. Golikov0O. V. Druzhininskaya1VILE of the FPS of RussiaVILE of the FPS of RussiaThe article presents the results of the study of should -constructions in the penitentiary instructions of the 19th century. The relevance of the work is due to the fact that the data obtained will complement the understanding of the means of expression of the category of directivity in the period of formation of the language of penal legislation. The novelty of the work is seen primarily in the fact that the forms of expression of the meaning of obligation are studied in legal discourse as a means of linguistic construction of the legal norm. In addition, the sources are the texts not previously studied from a linguistic standpoint. The article seeks to identify distinctive signs, allowing to differentiate between deontic and non-deontic necessity in legal discourse. Based on the idea that the basic semantic indicator of deontic or non-deontic statements with the meaning of obligation is the nature of the relationship of the subjects of obligation, the authors distinguish between the forms of a normative obligation and a need. The first, having in its syntactic structure the position of an agent, imply the ratio of subjects through the force of coercion. The second, active constructions with non-agentive subject, are determined by the opposition of the subject-addressee of obligation, implementing the modes of need and aspiration, and the subject of voluntariness, which in turn implements a strong-willed impact on an agent that bears an non-normative character.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1293language of legislationprison instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> centurymodality of obligationform of a normative obligationform of a need
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. M. Golikov
O. V. Druzhininskaya
spellingShingle L. M. Golikov
O. V. Druzhininskaya
Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
Научный диалог
language of legislation
prison instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> century
modality of obligation
form of a normative obligation
form of a need
author_facet L. M. Golikov
O. V. Druzhininskaya
author_sort L. M. Golikov
title Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_short Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_full Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_fullStr Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_full_unstemmed Forms of Obligation in Penitentiary Instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> Century
title_sort forms of obligation in penitentiary instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> century
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
series Научный диалог
issn 2225-756X
2227-1295
publishDate 2019-09-01
description The article presents the results of the study of should -constructions in the penitentiary instructions of the 19th century. The relevance of the work is due to the fact that the data obtained will complement the understanding of the means of expression of the category of directivity in the period of formation of the language of penal legislation. The novelty of the work is seen primarily in the fact that the forms of expression of the meaning of obligation are studied in legal discourse as a means of linguistic construction of the legal norm. In addition, the sources are the texts not previously studied from a linguistic standpoint. The article seeks to identify distinctive signs, allowing to differentiate between deontic and non-deontic necessity in legal discourse. Based on the idea that the basic semantic indicator of deontic or non-deontic statements with the meaning of obligation is the nature of the relationship of the subjects of obligation, the authors distinguish between the forms of a normative obligation and a need. The first, having in its syntactic structure the position of an agent, imply the ratio of subjects through the force of coercion. The second, active constructions with non-agentive subject, are determined by the opposition of the subject-addressee of obligation, implementing the modes of need and aspiration, and the subject of voluntariness, which in turn implements a strong-willed impact on an agent that bears an non-normative character.
topic language of legislation
prison instruction of 19<sup>th</sup> century
modality of obligation
form of a normative obligation
form of a need
url https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1293
work_keys_str_mv AT lmgolikov formsofobligationinpenitentiaryinstructionof19supthsupcentury
AT ovdruzhininskaya formsofobligationinpenitentiaryinstructionof19supthsupcentury
_version_ 1716863599402549248