Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US data

Abstract Background Medical information is often conflicting and consequently perceived as ambiguous. There are individual differences both in how much people perceive ambiguity and in their tolerance for such ambiguity. Little is known about how these constructs are related to each other and with o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicolle Simonovic, Jennifer M. Taber, William M. P. Klein, Rebecca A. Ferrer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-06-01
Series:Health Expectations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13037
id doaj-f9e625fbda82407ab07ab3a461c346e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9e625fbda82407ab07ab3a461c346e22020-11-25T03:14:12ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252020-06-0123360361310.1111/hex.13037Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US dataNicolle Simonovic0Jennifer M. Taber1William M. P. Klein2Rebecca A. Ferrer3Department of Psychological Sciences Kent State University Kent OH USADepartment of Psychological Sciences Kent State University Kent OH USABehavioral Research Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD USABehavioral Research Program National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD USAAbstract Background Medical information is often conflicting and consequently perceived as ambiguous. There are individual differences both in how much people perceive ambiguity and in their tolerance for such ambiguity. Little is known about how these constructs are related to each other and with other beliefs. Objective To examine the association between (a) perceived medical ambiguity, (b) tolerance for medical ambiguity and (c) their associations with various medical and cancer‐specific judgement and decision‐making correlates. Method and Participants We conducted secondary data analyses using the cross‐sectional, nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey 4, Cycle 4 (n = 3,433, 51.0% female, Mage = 46.5). Analyses statistically controlled for age, sex, race, education and health‐care coverage. Main variables studied Perceived medical ambiguity, tolerance for medical ambiguity, cancer perceptions, health‐care experiences and preferences, and information‐seeking styles and beliefs. Results Perceived medical ambiguity and tolerance for medical ambiguity were statistically independent. Higher perceived ambiguity was associated with lower perceived cancer preventability, lower reliance on doctors, lower perceived health and information‐seeking self‐efficacy, lower perceived quality of the cancer information‐seeking process, and greater cancer information avoidance. Lower tolerance for ambiguity was associated with lower cancer worry, lower trust in doctors, lower likelihood of seeking health information, and lower engagement in medical research. Discussion and Conclusions Perceived medical ambiguity and tolerance for medical ambiguity seem to be distinct constructs. Findings have implications for how people make medical decisions when they perceive and prefer to avoid conflicting medical information.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13037ambiguity aversionconflicting informationperceived ambiguitytolerance for ambiguity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicolle Simonovic
Jennifer M. Taber
William M. P. Klein
Rebecca A. Ferrer
spellingShingle Nicolle Simonovic
Jennifer M. Taber
William M. P. Klein
Rebecca A. Ferrer
Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US data
Health Expectations
ambiguity aversion
conflicting information
perceived ambiguity
tolerance for ambiguity
author_facet Nicolle Simonovic
Jennifer M. Taber
William M. P. Klein
Rebecca A. Ferrer
author_sort Nicolle Simonovic
title Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US data
title_short Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US data
title_full Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US data
title_fullStr Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US data
title_full_unstemmed Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US data
title_sort evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: an analysis of nationally representative us data
publisher Wiley
series Health Expectations
issn 1369-6513
1369-7625
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Background Medical information is often conflicting and consequently perceived as ambiguous. There are individual differences both in how much people perceive ambiguity and in their tolerance for such ambiguity. Little is known about how these constructs are related to each other and with other beliefs. Objective To examine the association between (a) perceived medical ambiguity, (b) tolerance for medical ambiguity and (c) their associations with various medical and cancer‐specific judgement and decision‐making correlates. Method and Participants We conducted secondary data analyses using the cross‐sectional, nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey 4, Cycle 4 (n = 3,433, 51.0% female, Mage = 46.5). Analyses statistically controlled for age, sex, race, education and health‐care coverage. Main variables studied Perceived medical ambiguity, tolerance for medical ambiguity, cancer perceptions, health‐care experiences and preferences, and information‐seeking styles and beliefs. Results Perceived medical ambiguity and tolerance for medical ambiguity were statistically independent. Higher perceived ambiguity was associated with lower perceived cancer preventability, lower reliance on doctors, lower perceived health and information‐seeking self‐efficacy, lower perceived quality of the cancer information‐seeking process, and greater cancer information avoidance. Lower tolerance for ambiguity was associated with lower cancer worry, lower trust in doctors, lower likelihood of seeking health information, and lower engagement in medical research. Discussion and Conclusions Perceived medical ambiguity and tolerance for medical ambiguity seem to be distinct constructs. Findings have implications for how people make medical decisions when they perceive and prefer to avoid conflicting medical information.
topic ambiguity aversion
conflicting information
perceived ambiguity
tolerance for ambiguity
url https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13037
work_keys_str_mv AT nicollesimonovic evidencethatperceptionsofandtoleranceformedicalambiguityaredistinctconstructsananalysisofnationallyrepresentativeusdata
AT jennifermtaber evidencethatperceptionsofandtoleranceformedicalambiguityaredistinctconstructsananalysisofnationallyrepresentativeusdata
AT williammpklein evidencethatperceptionsofandtoleranceformedicalambiguityaredistinctconstructsananalysisofnationallyrepresentativeusdata
AT rebeccaaferrer evidencethatperceptionsofandtoleranceformedicalambiguityaredistinctconstructsananalysisofnationallyrepresentativeusdata
_version_ 1724643939661643776