Active Viscoelasticity of Sarcomeres

The perturbation response of muscle is important for the versatile, stable and agile control capabilities of animals. Muscle resists being stretched by developing forces in the passive tissues and in the active crossbridges. This review focuses on the active perturbation response of the sarcomere. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khoi D. Nguyen, Neelima Sharma, Madhusudhan Venkadesan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frobt.2018.00069/full
id doaj-f9cc162ca34e461a86b8c872c86c0218
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9cc162ca34e461a86b8c872c86c02182020-11-25T00:38:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Robotics and AI2296-91442018-06-01510.3389/frobt.2018.00069344831Active Viscoelasticity of SarcomeresKhoi D. NguyenNeelima SharmaMadhusudhan VenkadesanThe perturbation response of muscle is important for the versatile, stable and agile control capabilities of animals. Muscle resists being stretched by developing forces in the passive tissues and in the active crossbridges. This review focuses on the active perturbation response of the sarcomere. The active response exhibits typical stress relaxation, and thus approximated by a Maxwell material that has a spring and dashpot arranged in series. The ratio of damping to stiffness in this approximation defines the relaxation timescale for dissipating stresses that are developed in the crossbridges due to external perturbations. Current understanding of sarcomeres suggests that stiffness varies nearly linearly with neural excitation, but not much is known about damping. But if both stiffness and damping have the same functional (linear or not) dependence on neural excitation, then the stress relaxation timescale cannot be varied depending on the demands of the task. This implies an unavoidable and biologically unrealistic trade-off between how freely the crossbridges can yield and dissipate stresses when stretched (injury avoidance in agile motions) vs. how long they can maintain perturbation-induced stresses and behave like a solid material (stiffness maintenance for stability). We hypothesize that muscle circumvents this trade-off by varying damping in a nonlinear manner with neural excitation, unlike stiffness that varies linearly. Testing this hypothesis requires new experimental and mathematical characterization of muscle mechanics, and also identifies new design goals for robotic actuators.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frobt.2018.00069/fullmuscle viscoelasticitysarcomere mechanicsactive perturbation responsevariable impedancestress relaxation timescaledynamic modulus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khoi D. Nguyen
Neelima Sharma
Madhusudhan Venkadesan
spellingShingle Khoi D. Nguyen
Neelima Sharma
Madhusudhan Venkadesan
Active Viscoelasticity of Sarcomeres
Frontiers in Robotics and AI
muscle viscoelasticity
sarcomere mechanics
active perturbation response
variable impedance
stress relaxation timescale
dynamic modulus
author_facet Khoi D. Nguyen
Neelima Sharma
Madhusudhan Venkadesan
author_sort Khoi D. Nguyen
title Active Viscoelasticity of Sarcomeres
title_short Active Viscoelasticity of Sarcomeres
title_full Active Viscoelasticity of Sarcomeres
title_fullStr Active Viscoelasticity of Sarcomeres
title_full_unstemmed Active Viscoelasticity of Sarcomeres
title_sort active viscoelasticity of sarcomeres
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Robotics and AI
issn 2296-9144
publishDate 2018-06-01
description The perturbation response of muscle is important for the versatile, stable and agile control capabilities of animals. Muscle resists being stretched by developing forces in the passive tissues and in the active crossbridges. This review focuses on the active perturbation response of the sarcomere. The active response exhibits typical stress relaxation, and thus approximated by a Maxwell material that has a spring and dashpot arranged in series. The ratio of damping to stiffness in this approximation defines the relaxation timescale for dissipating stresses that are developed in the crossbridges due to external perturbations. Current understanding of sarcomeres suggests that stiffness varies nearly linearly with neural excitation, but not much is known about damping. But if both stiffness and damping have the same functional (linear or not) dependence on neural excitation, then the stress relaxation timescale cannot be varied depending on the demands of the task. This implies an unavoidable and biologically unrealistic trade-off between how freely the crossbridges can yield and dissipate stresses when stretched (injury avoidance in agile motions) vs. how long they can maintain perturbation-induced stresses and behave like a solid material (stiffness maintenance for stability). We hypothesize that muscle circumvents this trade-off by varying damping in a nonlinear manner with neural excitation, unlike stiffness that varies linearly. Testing this hypothesis requires new experimental and mathematical characterization of muscle mechanics, and also identifies new design goals for robotic actuators.
topic muscle viscoelasticity
sarcomere mechanics
active perturbation response
variable impedance
stress relaxation timescale
dynamic modulus
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frobt.2018.00069/full
work_keys_str_mv AT khoidnguyen activeviscoelasticityofsarcomeres
AT neelimasharma activeviscoelasticityofsarcomeres
AT madhusudhanvenkadesan activeviscoelasticityofsarcomeres
_version_ 1725296214608445440