Phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs. Rpb1, a single-copy gene.

Parabasalia are single-celled eukaryotes (protists) that are mainly comprised of endosymbionts of termites and wood roaches, intestinal commensals, human or veterinary parasites, and free-living species. Phylogenetic comparisons of parabasalids are typically based upon morphological characters and 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shehre-Banoo Malik, Cynthia D Brochu, Ivana Bilic, Jing Yuan, Michael Hess, John M Logsdon, Jane M Carlton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3111441?pdf=render
id doaj-f9c57e6084a74086839eac5e1eb4940d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9c57e6084a74086839eac5e1eb4940d2020-11-25T01:36:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0166e2077410.1371/journal.pone.0020774Phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs. Rpb1, a single-copy gene.Shehre-Banoo MalikCynthia D BrochuIvana BilicJing YuanMichael HessJohn M LogsdonJane M CarltonParabasalia are single-celled eukaryotes (protists) that are mainly comprised of endosymbionts of termites and wood roaches, intestinal commensals, human or veterinary parasites, and free-living species. Phylogenetic comparisons of parabasalids are typically based upon morphological characters and 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequence data (rDNA), while biochemical or molecular studies of parabasalids are limited to a few axenically cultivable parasites. These previous analyses and other studies based on PCR amplification of duplicated protein-coding genes are unable to fully resolve the evolutionary relationships of parabasalids. As a result, genetic studies of Parabasalia lag behind other organisms.Comparing parabasalid EF1α, α-tubulin, enolase and MDH protein-coding genes with information from the Trichomonas vaginalis genome reveals difficulty in resolving the history of species or isolates apart from duplicated genes. A conserved single-copy gene encodes the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Rpb1) in T. vaginalis and other eukaryotes. Here we directly sequenced Rpb1 degenerate PCR products from 10 parabasalid genera, including several T. vaginalis isolates and avian isolates, and compared these data by phylogenetic analyses. Rpb1 genes from parabasalids, diplomonads, Parabodo, Diplonema and Percolomonas were all intronless, unlike intron-rich homologs in Naegleria, Jakoba and Malawimonas.The phylogeny of Rpb1 from parasitic and free-living parabasalids, and conserved Rpb1 insertions, support Trichomonadea, Tritrichomonadea, and Hypotrichomonadea as monophyletic groups. These results are consistent with prior analyses of rDNA and GAPDH sequences and ultrastructural data. The Rpb1 phylogenetic tree also resolves species- and isolate-level relationships. These findings, together with the relative ease of Rpb1 isolation, make it an attractive tool for evaluating more extensive relationships within Parabasalia.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3111441?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shehre-Banoo Malik
Cynthia D Brochu
Ivana Bilic
Jing Yuan
Michael Hess
John M Logsdon
Jane M Carlton
spellingShingle Shehre-Banoo Malik
Cynthia D Brochu
Ivana Bilic
Jing Yuan
Michael Hess
John M Logsdon
Jane M Carlton
Phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs. Rpb1, a single-copy gene.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Shehre-Banoo Malik
Cynthia D Brochu
Ivana Bilic
Jing Yuan
Michael Hess
John M Logsdon
Jane M Carlton
author_sort Shehre-Banoo Malik
title Phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs. Rpb1, a single-copy gene.
title_short Phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs. Rpb1, a single-copy gene.
title_full Phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs. Rpb1, a single-copy gene.
title_fullStr Phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs. Rpb1, a single-copy gene.
title_full_unstemmed Phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs. Rpb1, a single-copy gene.
title_sort phylogeny of parasitic parabasalia and free-living relatives inferred from conventional markers vs. rpb1, a single-copy gene.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Parabasalia are single-celled eukaryotes (protists) that are mainly comprised of endosymbionts of termites and wood roaches, intestinal commensals, human or veterinary parasites, and free-living species. Phylogenetic comparisons of parabasalids are typically based upon morphological characters and 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequence data (rDNA), while biochemical or molecular studies of parabasalids are limited to a few axenically cultivable parasites. These previous analyses and other studies based on PCR amplification of duplicated protein-coding genes are unable to fully resolve the evolutionary relationships of parabasalids. As a result, genetic studies of Parabasalia lag behind other organisms.Comparing parabasalid EF1α, α-tubulin, enolase and MDH protein-coding genes with information from the Trichomonas vaginalis genome reveals difficulty in resolving the history of species or isolates apart from duplicated genes. A conserved single-copy gene encodes the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (Rpb1) in T. vaginalis and other eukaryotes. Here we directly sequenced Rpb1 degenerate PCR products from 10 parabasalid genera, including several T. vaginalis isolates and avian isolates, and compared these data by phylogenetic analyses. Rpb1 genes from parabasalids, diplomonads, Parabodo, Diplonema and Percolomonas were all intronless, unlike intron-rich homologs in Naegleria, Jakoba and Malawimonas.The phylogeny of Rpb1 from parasitic and free-living parabasalids, and conserved Rpb1 insertions, support Trichomonadea, Tritrichomonadea, and Hypotrichomonadea as monophyletic groups. These results are consistent with prior analyses of rDNA and GAPDH sequences and ultrastructural data. The Rpb1 phylogenetic tree also resolves species- and isolate-level relationships. These findings, together with the relative ease of Rpb1 isolation, make it an attractive tool for evaluating more extensive relationships within Parabasalia.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3111441?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT shehrebanoomalik phylogenyofparasiticparabasaliaandfreelivingrelativesinferredfromconventionalmarkersvsrpb1asinglecopygene
AT cynthiadbrochu phylogenyofparasiticparabasaliaandfreelivingrelativesinferredfromconventionalmarkersvsrpb1asinglecopygene
AT ivanabilic phylogenyofparasiticparabasaliaandfreelivingrelativesinferredfromconventionalmarkersvsrpb1asinglecopygene
AT jingyuan phylogenyofparasiticparabasaliaandfreelivingrelativesinferredfromconventionalmarkersvsrpb1asinglecopygene
AT michaelhess phylogenyofparasiticparabasaliaandfreelivingrelativesinferredfromconventionalmarkersvsrpb1asinglecopygene
AT johnmlogsdon phylogenyofparasiticparabasaliaandfreelivingrelativesinferredfromconventionalmarkersvsrpb1asinglecopygene
AT janemcarlton phylogenyofparasiticparabasaliaandfreelivingrelativesinferredfromconventionalmarkersvsrpb1asinglecopygene
_version_ 1725062632124186624