Unenforced Promises

Treaties between the United States and Native nations are binding until abrogated by the clear and plain intent of Congress. Many treaties signed in the 18th and 19th centuries remain unabrogated, but are also unenforced by the courts of the United States. The Dewey Burdock Project is a proposed ur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alyson Merlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2021-04-01
Series:Columbia Journal of Race and Law
Online Access:https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/8236
id doaj-f9c3976f0b6a478bb4eb96d165cf7b39
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9c3976f0b6a478bb4eb96d165cf7b392021-05-04T17:58:34ZengColumbia University LibrariesColumbia Journal of Race and Law2155-24012021-04-01112Unenforced PromisesAlyson Merlin Treaties between the United States and Native nations are binding until abrogated by the clear and plain intent of Congress. Many treaties signed in the 18th and 19th centuries remain unabrogated, but are also unenforced by the courts of the United States. The Dewey Burdock Project is a proposed uranium mining operation which would sit adjacent to the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, where many members of the Oglala Sioux reside. The 1851 and 1868 Fort Laramie Treaties impliedly grant the Sioux access to safe drinking water and explicitly reserve for them off- reservation buffalo hunting rights. This Note posits that unenforced but unabrogated treaty rights may serve as a mechanism for the Oglala Sioux to assert a greater role in decision-making regarding the Dewey Burdock Project. This Note also discusses the failure of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to consider the project's effect on protected treaty rights, which may be a basis for injunctive relief. It lastly conceptualizes the project's interference with treaty rights as a property loss deserving of monetary compensation, both in the context of a government taking by the agency and as private interference by the mining company. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/8236
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alyson Merlin
spellingShingle Alyson Merlin
Unenforced Promises
Columbia Journal of Race and Law
author_facet Alyson Merlin
author_sort Alyson Merlin
title Unenforced Promises
title_short Unenforced Promises
title_full Unenforced Promises
title_fullStr Unenforced Promises
title_full_unstemmed Unenforced Promises
title_sort unenforced promises
publisher Columbia University Libraries
series Columbia Journal of Race and Law
issn 2155-2401
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Treaties between the United States and Native nations are binding until abrogated by the clear and plain intent of Congress. Many treaties signed in the 18th and 19th centuries remain unabrogated, but are also unenforced by the courts of the United States. The Dewey Burdock Project is a proposed uranium mining operation which would sit adjacent to the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, where many members of the Oglala Sioux reside. The 1851 and 1868 Fort Laramie Treaties impliedly grant the Sioux access to safe drinking water and explicitly reserve for them off- reservation buffalo hunting rights. This Note posits that unenforced but unabrogated treaty rights may serve as a mechanism for the Oglala Sioux to assert a greater role in decision-making regarding the Dewey Burdock Project. This Note also discusses the failure of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to consider the project's effect on protected treaty rights, which may be a basis for injunctive relief. It lastly conceptualizes the project's interference with treaty rights as a property loss deserving of monetary compensation, both in the context of a government taking by the agency and as private interference by the mining company.
url https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/8236
work_keys_str_mv AT alysonmerlin unenforcedpromises
_version_ 1721477519830417408